skip to main content
research-article

On the Dynamics of Social Media Popularity: A YouTube Case Study

Published:17 December 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Understanding the factors that impact the popularity dynamics of social media can drive the design of effective information services, besides providing valuable insights to content generators and online advertisers. Taking YouTube as case study, we analyze how video popularity evolves since upload, extracting popularity trends that characterize groups of videos. We also analyze the referrers that lead users to videos, correlating them, features of the video and early popularity measures with the popularity trend and total observed popularity the video will experience. Our findings provide fundamental knowledge about popularity dynamics and its implications for services such as advertising and search.

References

  1. Mohamed Ahmed, Stella Spagna, Felipe Huici, and Saverio Niccolini. 2013. A peek into the future: Predicting the evolution of popularity in user generated content. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ashton Anderson, Ravi Kumar, Andrew Tomkins, and Sergei Vassilvitski. 2014. Dynamics of repeat consumption. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Youmna Borghol, Sebastien Ardon, Niklas Carlsson, Derek Eager, and Anirban Mahanti. 2012. The untold story of the clones: Content-agnostic factors that impact YouTube video popularity. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Youmna Borghol, Siddharth Mitra, Sebastien Ardon, Niklas Carlsson, Derek Eager, and Anirban Mahanti. 2011. Characterizing and modeling popularity of user-generated videos. Performance Eval. 68, 11, 1037--1055. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Anders Brodersen, Salvatore Scellato, and Mirjam Wattenhofer. 2012. YouTube around the world. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tom Broxton, Yannet Interian, Jon Vaver, and Mirjam Wattenhofer. 2011. Catching a Viral Video. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Juan Miguel Carrascosa, Roberto González, Rubén Cuevas, and Arturo Azcorra. 2013. Are trending topics useful for marketing? In Proceedings of the Conference on Online Social Networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Meeyoung Cha, Fabrício Benevenuto, Yong-Yeol Ahn, and Krishna Gummadi. 2012. Delayed information cascades in Flickr: Measurement, analysis, and modeling. Comput. Networks 56, 3, 1066--1076. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Meeyoung Cha, Haewoon Kwak, Pablo Rodriguez, Yong-Yeol Ahn, and Sue Moon. 2009. Analyzing the video popularity characteristics of large-scale user generated content systems. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking 17, 5, 1357--1370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gloria Chatzopoulou, Cheng Sheng, and Michalis Faloutsos. 2009. A first step towards understanding popularity in YouTube. In Proceedings of the Infocom Workshops.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Aaron Clauset, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman. 2009. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51, 4, 661--703. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Michael D. Conover, Emilio Ferrara, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2013. The digital evolution of occupy wall street. PloS one 8, 5, e64679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Graham Cormode and Balachander Krishnamurthy. 2008. Key differences between Web1.0 and Web2.0. First Monday 13, 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas. 2006. Elements of Information Theory. Vol. 6, Wiley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Riley Crane and Didier Sornette. 2008. Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 105, 41, 15649--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. David Easley and Jon Kleinberg. 2010. Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2013. Traveling trends: Social butterflies or frequent fliers? In Proceedings of the Conference on Online Social Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Flavio Figueiredo, Fabrício Benevenuto, and Jussara Almeida. 2011. The tube over time: characterizing popularity growth of YouTube videos. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Flavio Figueiredo, Henrique Pinto, Fabiano Belém, Jussara Almeida, Marcos Gonçalves, David Fernandes, and Edleno Moura. 2012. Assessing the quality of textual features in social media. Inf. Process. Manage. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Scott A. Golder and Bernado Hubberman. 2006. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. J. Inf. Sci. 32, 2, 198--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. Aminul Islam, Derek Eager, Niklas Carlsson, and Anirban Mahanti. 2013. Revisiting Popularity Characterization and Modeling of User-generated Videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lu Jiang, Yajie Miao, Yi Yang, Zhenzhong Lan, and Alexander G. Hauptmann. 2014. Viral video style: A closer look at viral videos on YouTube. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Krishna Y. Kamath, James Caverlee, Kyumin Lee, and Zhiyuan Cheng. 2013. Spatio-temporal dynamics of online memes: a study of geo-tagged tweets. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Andreas M. Kaplan and Michael Haenlein. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons 53, 1, 59--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Gjergji Kasneci, Maya Ramanath, Fabian Suchanek, and Gerhard Weikum. 2009. The YAGO-NAGA approach to knowledge discovery. ACM SIGMOD Record 37, 4, 41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Aditya Khosla, Atish Das Sarma, and Raffay Hamid. 2014. What makes an image popular. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Himabindu Lakkaraju, Julian McAuley, and Jure Leskovec. 2013. What's in a name? Understanding the interplay between titles, content, and communities in social media. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Janette Lehmann, Bruno Gonçalves, José J. Ramasco, and Ciro Cattuto. 2012. Dynamical classes of collective attention in twitter. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kristina Lerman and Laurie Jones. 2006. Social browsing on Flickr. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Haitao Li, Xiaoqiang Ma, Feng Wang, Jiangchuan Liu, and Ke Xu. 2013. On popularity prediction of videos shared in online social networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jessica Lin, Eamonn Keogh, Li Wei, and Stefano Lonardi. 2007. Experiencing SAX: A novel symbolic representation of time series. Data Mining Knowl. Discov. 15, 2, 107--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Cameron Marlow, Mor Naaman, Danah Boyd, and Marc Davis. 2006. HT06, tagging paper, taxonomy, Flickr, academic article, ToRead. In Proceedings of Hypertext'06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Yasuko Matsubara, Yasushi Sakurai, B. Aditya Prakash, Lei Li, and Christos Faloutsos. 2012. Rise and fall patterns of information diffusion. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Daniel Menascé and Virgilio Almeida. 2002. Capacity Planning for Web Services: Metrics, Models, and Methods. Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Márton Mestyán, Taha Yasseri, and János Kertész. 2013. Early prediction of movie box office success based on Wikipedia activity big data. PloS one 8, 8, e71226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Helen Susannah Moat, Chester Curme, Adam Avakian, Dror Kenett, Eugene Stanley, and Tobias Preis. 2013. Quantifying Wikipedia usage patterns before stock market moves. Scientific Reports 3, 1801.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Rodrigo De Oliveira, Mauro Cherubini, and Nuria Oliver. 2010. Looking at Near-Duplicate Videos from a Human-Centric Perspective. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 6, 3, 1--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Henrique Pinto, Jussara Almeida, and Marcos Gonçalves. 2013. Using Early View Patterns to Predict the Popularity of YouTube Videos. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Tobias Preis, Helen Susannah Moat, and H. Eugene Stanley. 2013. Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google Trends. Scientific Reports 3, 1684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Kira Radinsky, Krysta Svore, Susan Dumais, Jaime Teevan, Alex Bocharov, and Eric Horvitz. 2013. Behavioral dynamics on the web: Learning, modeling, and prediction. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 32, 3, 1--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Jacob Ratkiewicz, Alessandro Flammini, and Fillipo Menczer. 2010. Traffic in social media I: paths through information networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Security of Information and Networks.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. David Reshef, Yakir Reshef, Hilary K. Finucane, Sharon R. Grossman, Gilean McVean, Peter J. Turnbaugh, Eric S. Lander, Michael Mitzenmacher, and Pardis C. Sabeti. 2011. Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science 334, 6062, 1518--1524.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Sitabhra Sinha and Raj Kumar Pan. 2007. How a “hit” is born: The emergence of popularity from the dynamics of collective choice. In Econophysics and Sociophysics: Trends and Perspectives. Wiley, Online.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Anjana Susarla, Jeong-Ha Oh, and Yong Tan. 2011. Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Inf. Syst. Res. 23, 1, 1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Gabor Szabo and Bernardo Huberman. 2010. Predicting the popularity of online content. Commun. ACM 53, 8, 80--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Athena Vakali, Maria Giatsoglou, and Stefanos Antaris. 2012. Social networking trends and dynamics detection via a cloud-based framework design. In Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Roelof van Zwol. 2007. Flickr: Who is looking?. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence. IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Chunyan Wang and Bernardo Huberman. 2012. Long trend dynamics in social media. EPJ Data Science 1, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Mirjam Wattenhofer, Roger Wattenhofer, and Zack Zhu. 2012. The YouTube social network. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Lillian Weng, Alessandro Flammini, Alessandro Vespignani, and Fillipo Menczer. 2012. Competition among memes in a world with limited attention. Scientific Reports 2, 335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Lilian Weng, Filippo Menczer, and Yong-Yeol Ahn. 2013. Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Scientific Reports 3, 2522.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Jaewon Yang and Jure Leskovec. 2010. Modeling information diffusion in implicit networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Jaewon Yang and Jure Leskovec. 2011. Patterns of temporal variation in online media. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Renjie Zhou, Samamon Khemmarat, and Lixin Gao. 2011. The impact of YouTube recommendation system on video views. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On the Dynamics of Social Media Popularity: A YouTube Case Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
      ACM Transactions on Internet Technology  Volume 14, Issue 4
      Special Issue on Foundations of Social Computing
      December 2014
      143 pages
      ISSN:1533-5399
      EISSN:1557-6051
      DOI:10.1145/2699996
      • Editor:
      • Munindar P. Singh
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 December 2014
      • Accepted: 1 August 2014
      • Revised: 1 May 2014
      • Received: 1 November 2013
      Published in toit Volume 14, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader