Peter H. Kahn
Takayuki Kanda
ABSTRACT
Will people keep the secret of a socially compelling robot who shares, in confidence, a "personal" (robot) failing? Toward answering this question, 81 adults participated in a 20-minute interaction with (a) a humanoid robot (Robovie) interacting in a highly social way as a lab tour guide, and (b) with a human being interacting in the same highly social way. As a baseline comparison, participants also interacted with (c) a humanoid robot (Robovie) interacting in a more rudimentary social way. In each condition, the tour guide asks for the secret keeping behavior. Results showed that the majority of the participants (59%) kept the secret of the highly social robot, and did not tell the experimenter when asked directly, with the robot present. This percentage did not differ statistically from the percentage who kept the human's secret (67%). It did differ statistically when the robot engaged in the more rudimentary social interaction (11%). These results suggest that as humanoid robots become increasingly social in their interaction, that people will form increasingly intimate and trusting psychological relationships with them. Discussion focuses on design principles (how to engender psychological intimacy in human-robot interaction) and norms (whether it is even desirable to do so, and if so in what contexts).
Supplemental Material
- Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychology study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231--260. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381376Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bainbridge, W. A., Hart, J., Kim, E. S., & Scassellati, B. (2008). The effect of presence on human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 701706. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2008.4600749Google ScholarCross Ref
- Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., Read, R., Wood, R., Cuayáhuitl, H., Kiefer, B., -- Humbert, R. (2012). Multimodal childrobot interaction: Building social bonds. Journal of HumanRobot Interaction, 1, 33--53. doi:10.5898/JHRI.1.2.BelpaemeGoogle Scholar
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Socially intelligent agents in human primate culture. In R. Trappl & S. Payr (Eds.), Agent culture: Human-agent interaction in a multicultural world (pp. 4571). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, G., & Vanunu, K. (2013). Effects of robotic companionship on music enjoyment and agent perception. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on HumanRobot Interaction, 317--324. doi:10.1145/2447556.2447674 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2011). Technological nature: Adaptation and the future of human life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kahn, P. H., Jr., Freier, N. G., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Ruckert, J. H., Severson, R., & Kane, S. K. (2008). Design patterns for sociality in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 97--104. doi:10.1145/1349822.1349836 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kahn, P. H., Jr., Gary, H. E., & Shen S. (2013). Children's social relationship with current and near-future robots. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 32--37. doi:10.1111/cdep.12011Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kahn, P. H., Jr., Ishiguro, H., Friedman, B., Kanda, T., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., & Miller, J. (2007). What is a human? Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction. Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 8(3), 363--390. doi:10.1075/is.8.3.04kahGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Kahn, P. H., Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., -- Shen, S. (2012). "Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": Children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48, 303--314. doi:10.1037/a0027033Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kahn, P. H., Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B. T., Ruckert, J. H., Shen, S., -- Severson, R. L. (2012). Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on HumanRobot Interaction, 33--40. doi:10.1145/2157689.2157696 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kahn, P. H., Jr., & Turiel, E. (1988). Children's conceptions of trust in the context of social expectations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 403--419.Google Scholar
- Kaniarasu, P., & Steinfeld, A. M. (2014). Effects of blame on trust in human robot interaction. Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 850--855. doi:10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926359Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kidd, C. D., & Breazeal, C. (2007). A robotic weight loss coach. Proceedings of the 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1985--1986. Retrieved from AAAI: http://www.aaai.org/Papers/AAAI/2007/AAAI07--366.pdf Google ScholarDigital Library
- Levy, D. N. (2007). Love + sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relations. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Nakagawa, K., Shiomi, M., Shinozawa, K., Matsumura, R., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2011). Effect of robot's active touch on people's motivation. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 465472. doi:10.1145/1957656.1957819 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nie, J., Pak, M., Marin, A. L., & Sundar, S. S. (2012). Can you hold my hand? Physical warmth in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 201--202. doi:10.1145/2157689.2157755 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rotenberg, K. J. (Ed.). (2010). Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1--7. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.1.1Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stanton, C. M., Kahn, P. H., Jr., Severson, R. L., Ruckert, J. H., & Gill, B. T. (2008). Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 271--278. doi:10.1145/1349822.1349858 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Turiel, E. (1998). The development of morality. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 863932). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Velonaki, M., Silvera-Tawil, D., & Rye, D. (2013). Affective Human-Robot Interactions in Social Spaces: Two Case Studies. Proceedings of the Workshop on Applications for Emotional Robots, 8th International Conference on HumanRobot Interaction.Google Scholar
- Wada, K., & Shibata, T. (2007). Living with seal robots-Its socio psychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 972--980. doi:10.1109/TRO.2007.906261 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Williams, V. S. L., Jones, L. V., & Tukey, J. W. (1999). Controlling error in multiple comparisons, with examples from state-to-state differences in educational achievement. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 42--69. doi:10.3102/10769986024001042Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Will People Keep the Secret of a Humanoid Robot?: Psychological Intimacy in HRI
Recommendations
Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes?
HRI '12: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot InteractionRobots will increasingly take on roles in our social lives where they can cause humans harm. When robots do so, will people hold robots morally accountable? To investigate this question, 40 undergraduate students individually engaged in a 15-minute ...
Differences between Young and Old Users when Interacting with a Humanoid Robot: A Qualitative Usability Study
HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionThere is a growing body of knowledge on how people interact with robots, but limited information on the difference between young and old adults in their preferences when interacting with humanoid robots. Our goals in the current study were: (1) to ...
Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot
HRI '07: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interactionHRI researchers interested in social robots have made large investments in humanoid robots. There is still sparse evidence that peoples' responses to robots differ from their responses to computer agents, suggesting that agent studies might serve to ...
Comments