Allison Sauppé
Bilge Mutlu
ABSTRACT
Across history and cultures, robots have been envisioned as assistants working alongside people. Following this vision, an emerging family of products-collaborative manufacturing robots-is enabling human and robot workers to work side by side as collaborators in manufacturing tasks. Their introduction presents an opportunity to better understand people's interactions with and perceptions of a robot "co-worker" in a real-world setting to guide the design of these products. In this paper, we present findings from an ethnographic field study at three manufacturing sites and a Grounded Theory analysis of observations and interviews. Our results show that, even in this safety-critical manufacturing setting, workers relate to the robot as a social entity and rely on cues to understand the robot's actions, which we observed to be critical for workers to feel safe when near the robot. These findings contribute to our understanding of interactions with robotic products in real-world settings and offer important design implications.
Supplemental Material
- Bickmore, T., and Cassell, J. Social dialogue with embodied conversational agents. In Advances in natural multimodal dialogue systems. Springer, 2005, 23--54.Google Scholar
- Breazeal, C. Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. Int J Hum-Comput St 59, 1 (2003), 119--155. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brogårdh, T. Present and future robot control development-an industrial perspective. Annu Rev Control 31, 1 (2007), 69--79.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fogg, B. J. Persuasive computers: Perspectives and research directions. In Proc. CHI '98 (1998), 225--232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Forlizzi, J. How robotic products become social products: An ethnographic study of cleaning in the home. In Proc. HRI '07 (2007), 129--136. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Forlizzi, J., and DiSalvo, C. Service robots in the domestic environment: A study of the Roomba vacuum in the home. In Proc. HRI '06 (2006), 258--265. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., and Strutzel, E. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Nurs Res 17, 4 (1968), 364.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., and Powers, A. Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In Proc. ROMAN '03 (2003), 55--60.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hirschfeld, R., Aghazadeh, F., and Chapleski, R. Survey of robot safety in industry. Int J Hum Factor Man 3, 4 (1993), 369--379.Google Scholar
- Kock, S., Vittor, T., Matthias, B., Jerregard, H., Kallman, M., Lundberg, I., Mellander, R., and Hedelind, M. Robot concept for scalable, flexible assembly automation: A technology study on a harmless dual-armed robot. In Proc. of ISAM (2011), 1--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kopp, S., Gesellensetter, L., Krämer, N. C., and Wachsmuth, I. A conversational agent as museum guide-design and evaluation of a real-world application. In Proc. IVA '05 (2005), 329--343. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee, M. K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., and Rybski, P. Ripple effects of an embedded social agent: A field study of a social robot in the workplace. In Proc. CHI '12 (2012), 695--704. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ljungblad, S., Kotrbova, J., Jacobsson, M., Cramer, H., and Niechwiadowicz, K. Hospital robot at work: Something alien or an intelligent colleague? In Proc. CSCW '12 (2012), 177--186. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthias, B., Kock, S., Jerregard, H., Kallman, M., Lundberg, I., and Mellander, R. Safety of collaborative industrial robots: Certification possibilities for a collaborative assembly robot concept. In Proc. ISAM '11 (2011), 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moon, Y. Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. J Consum Res 26, 4 (2000), 323--339.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mutlu, B., and Forlizzi, J. Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction. In Proc. HRI '08 (2008), 287--294. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nass, C., and Lee, K. M. Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? An experimental test of similarity-attraction. In Proc. CHI '00 (2000), 329--336. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nass, C., and Moon, Y. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. J Soc Issues 56, 1 (2000), 81--103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shibata, T. An overview of human interactive robots for psychological enrichment. In Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 92 (2004), 1749--1758.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Siino, R., and Hinds, P. J. Robots, gender & sensemaking: Sex segregation's impact on workers making sense of a mobile autonomous robot. In Proc. ICRA '05, vol. 3 (2005), 2773.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sung, J.-Y., Christensen, H. I., and Grinter, R. E. Robots in the wild: Understanding long-term use. In Proc. HRI '09 (2009), 45--52. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sung, J.-Y., Grinter, R. E., Christensen, H. I., and Guo, L. Housewives or technophiles?: Understanding domestic robot owners. In Proc. HRI '08 (2008), 129--136. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sung, J.-Y., Guo, L., Grinter, R., and Christensen, H. "My Roomba is Rambo:" Intimate home appliances. In Proc. UbiComp '07 (2007), 145--162. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vertesi, J. Seeing like a rover: Embodied experience on the mars exploration rover mission. In Proc. CHI '08 Extended Abstracts (2008), 2523--2532. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The Social Impact of a Robot Co-Worker in Industrial Settings
Recommendations
Collaborative or Simply Uncaged? Understanding Human-Cobot Interactions in Automation
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsCollaborative robots, or cobots, represent a breakthrough technology designed for high-level (e.g. collaborative) interactions between workers and robots with capabilities for flexible deployment in industries such as manufacturing. Understanding how ...
Attitudes of Factory Workers towards Industrial and Collaborative Robots
HRI '17: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionDespite the predicted growth of the amount of collaborative robots, little attention has been paid to the attitudes and needs of potential future users of these robots (e.g. factory workers). The main goal of our study was to identify recommendations to ...
Designing Social Cues for Collaborative Robots: The Role of Gaze and Breathing in Human-Robot Collaboration
HRI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionIn this paper, we investigate how collaborative robots, or cobots, typically composed of a robotic arm and a gripper carrying out manipulation tasks alongside human coworkers, can be enhanced with HRI capabilities by applying ideas and principles from ...
Comments