ABSTRACT
This paper introduces FugaciousFilm, a soap film based touch display, as a platform for Attentive Interaction that encourages the user to be highly focused throughout the use of the interface. Previous work on ephemeral user interfaces has primarily focused on the development of ambient and peripheral displays. In contrast, FugaciousFilm is an ephemeral display that aims to promote highly attentive interaction. We present the iterative process of developing this interface, spanning technical explorations, prototyping and a user study. We report lessons learnt when designing the interface; ranging from the soap film mixture to the impact of frames and apertures. We then describe developing the touch, push, pull and pop interactions. Our user study shows how FugaciousFilm led to focused and attentive interactions during a tournament of enhanced Tic-Tac-Toe. We then finish by discussing how the principles of vulnerability and delicacy can motivate the design of attentive ephemeral interfaces.
Supplemental Material
- Alrøe, T. et al., Aerial Tunes: Exploring Interaction Qualities of Mid-air Displays. In Proc. NordiCHI '12. ACM Press (2012), 514--523. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benford, S. et al., Uncomfortable Interactions. In Proc. CHI'12. ACM Press (2012), p. 2005--2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carroll, J. M. (Ed.) (2003). HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann publishers.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Döring, T., Sylvester, A., Schmidt, A. A Design Space for Ephemeral User Interfaces. In Proc. TEI '13, ACM Press (2013). 75--82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. C. Hulst and H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles. Dover Publications, 1957.Google Scholar
- Isenberg, C. The Science of Soap Films and Soap Bubbles. Dover Publications, 1978.Google Scholar
- Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proc. CHI'97. ACM Press, 234--241. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koleva, B. et al., "Orchestrating a Mixed Reality Performance," In Proc. CHI'01 ACM Press, p. 38--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martinez P, D., Joyce, E., Subramanian, S. MisTable: Reach-through Personal Screens for Tabletops, In Proc. CHI'14, ACM Press 3493--3502. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marshall, J. et al., Breath control of amusement rides. In Proc. CHI'11. ACM Press (2011). 73--82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Monk, A. and Gilbert, G. N. Perspectives on HCI: Diverse Approaches. Academic Press, 1995.Google Scholar
- Murer, M., Aslan, I., and Tscheligi, M. LOLLio: exploring taste as playful modality. In Proc. TEI'13, ACM Press (2013) 299--302. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nakamura, M. et al. Bubble Cosmos. SIGGRAPH '06 Emerging Technologies. ACM Press (2006). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Norman, D. 1991. Cognitive artifacts. In Designing interaction, John M. Carroll (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, 17--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ochiai, Y., Hoshi, A.O.T. & Rekimoto, J. Reflective, deformable, colloidal display. In Post. SIGGRAPH '13. ACM Press (2013). 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ochiai, Y., Hoshi, T., Oyama, A. and Rekimoto, J., "Poppable display: A display that enables popping, breaking, and tearing interactions with people," Consumer Electronics, IEEE (2013). 124--128.Google Scholar
- Popp, J. Bit.Fall {Installation}. 2004. Various locations.Google Scholar
- Rakkolainen, I. et al. The Interactive FogScreen. In SIGGRAPH '05 Emerging Technologies. ACM (2005). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rydarowski, A., Samanci, O. and Mazalek, A. Murmur: kinetic relief sculpture, multi-sensory display, listening machine. In Proc. TEI 2008, ACM (2008), 231--238. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sas, C. and Whittaker, S. Design for forgetting. In Proc. CHI'13, ACM Press (2013), p. 1823. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Seah, S A. et al. SensaBubble: a chrono-sensory mid-air display of sight and smell. In Proc. CHI '14. ACM, 2863--2872. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shapiro, L., and Stockman, G. (2002). Computer Vision. Prentice Hall. pp. 69--73Google Scholar
- Shein, E. Ephemeral Data. Commun. ACM Press (2013). 20--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Slater, M. and Wilbur, S. A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments Presence 6: (1997) 603--616.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sylvester, A. et al., "Liquids, Smoke, and Soap Bubbles: Reflections on Materials for Ephemeral User Interfaces". In Proc. TEI'10, ACM (2010). 269--270. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tolmie, P. et al. Unremarkable computing. In Proc. CHI '02, ACM (2002). p. 399--406. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Uriu, D. and Okude, N. ThanatoFenestra: photographic family altar supporting a ritual to pray for the deceased. In Proc. DIS '10. ACM Press (2010). 422--425. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weiser, M. Creating the invisible interface: (invited talk). In Proc. UIST '94. ACM Press (1994). 1--. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weiser, M. The computer for the 21st century. SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev.3, ACM Press (1999). 3--11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weiser, M., Brown, J.S. The coming age of calm technology. In Beyond calculation, Copernicus, USA 1997. 75--85. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- FugaciousFilm: Exploring Attentive Interaction with Ephemeral Material
Recommendations
Liquids, smoke, and soap bubbles: reflections on materials for ephemeral user interfaces
TEI '10: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interactionIn this paper we inquire material qualities for tangible user interfaces and introduce the term "ephemeral user interface". We present an example user interface that employs fragile soap bubbles for human-computer interaction: the user has to move or ...
Impact of mobile tangible slider design and its reachability on pointing performance
IHM '16: Actes de la 28ième conference francophone sur l'Interaction Homme-MachineTouch interaction is almost omnipresent on mobile devices and technological advances have made screens bigger. The users can then interact with more content displayed on screen but it is more difficult for the users to reach all the parts of the screen ...
Tangible 3D tabletops: combining tangible tabletop interaction and 3D projection
NordiCHI '12: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through DesignIn this paper we present the tangible 3D tabletop and discuss the design potential of this novel interface. The tangible 3D tabletop combines tangible tabletop interaction with 3D projection in such a way that the tangible objects may be augmented with ...
Comments