ABSTRACT
Teaching computer security is one of the most challenging tasks in computer science, because of the need to successfully integrate abstract concepts and practical applications. Several e-learning systems have been developed to address this issue. However, they usually provide the same material in the same sequence irrespective of the characteristics of the students, such as their knowledge level and learning style. In this paper, an approach to learning style adaptivity is proposed for the teaching of computer security. An e-learning system was developed to provide more personalised and adaptive learning, based on the information perception style of the Felder-Silverman model. This is the dimension of learning style, which has received the least attention in published research. In the approach, a personalised sequence of learning material is generated based on an individual learning style. The approach is evaluated in order to determine its effectiveness in learning provision. An experiment conducted with sixty subjects produced significant results. They indicate that matching computer security learning material, according to the learning style of the students, yields significantly better learning gain and student satisfaction than without matching.
- Akbulut, Y. and Cardak, C.S.Adaptive educational hypermedia accommodating learning styles: A content analysis of publications from 2000 to 2011. Computers & Education 58, 2 (2012), 835--842. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alshammari, M., Anane, R., and Hendley, R.Adaptivity in E-Learning Systems. The 8th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS 2014), (2014), 79--86. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alshammari, M., Anane, R., and Hendley, R.An E-Learning Investigation into Learning Style Adaptivity. The 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-48), (2015), pp. 11--20. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anane, R., Purohit, K., and Theodoropoulos, G.An Animated Cryptographic Learning Object. Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation, 2008. CGIV'08. Fifth International Conference on, (2008), 61--68 http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/lemsys/DES/. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anane, R.The Learning Object Triangle. Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on, (2014), 719--721. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brusilovsky, P. and Millán, E.User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. The adaptive web, (2007), 3--53. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brusilovsky, P.Adaptive Hypermedia for Education and Training. Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education, (2012), 46.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Buch, K. and Sena, C.Accommodating diverse learning styles in the design and delivery of on-line learning experiences. International Journal of Engineering Education 17, 1 (2001), 93--98.Google Scholar
- Chrysafiadi, K. and Virvou, M.Student modeling approaches: A literature review for the last decade. Expert Systems with Applications 40, 11 (2013), 4715--4729. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., and Ecclestone, K.Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Centre London, London, 2004.Google Scholar
- Cone, B.D., Irvine, C.E., Thompson, M.F., and Nguyen, T.D.A video game for cyber security training and awareness. Computers & Security 26, 1 (2007), 63--72. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., and Dietz, E.J.The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education 91, 1 (2002), 3--17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Felder, R.M. and Silverman, L.K.Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering education 78, 7 (1988), 674--681.Google Scholar
- Felder, R.M. and Spurlin, J.Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education 21, 1 (2005), 103--112.Google Scholar
- Hu, D. and Wang, Y.Y.Teaching Computer Security using Xen in a Virtual Environment. Information Security and Assurance, 2008. ISA 2008. International Conference on, (2008), 389--392. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hu, J., Meinel, C., and Schmitt, M.Tele-lab IT Security: An Architecture for Interactive Lessons for Security Education. Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM (2004), 412--416. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keefe, J.W.Learning style: An overview. Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs, (1979), 1--17.Google Scholar
- Klasnja-Milicevic, A., Vesin, B., Ivanovic, M., and Budimac, Z.E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification. Computers & Education 56, 3 (2011), 885--899. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Konak, A., Clark, T.K., and Nasereddin, M.Using Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle to improve student learning in virtual computer laboratories. Computers & Education 72, 0 (2014), 11--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marsa-Maestre, I., De La Hoz, E., Gimenez-Guzman, J.M., and Lopez-Carmona, M.A.Design and evaluation of a learning environment to effectively provide network security skills. Computers & Education 69, (2013), 225--236. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mitrovic, A.An intelligent SQL tutor on the web. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13, 2 (2003), 173--197. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rößling, G., Joy, M., Moreno, A., et al.Enhancing Learning Management Systems to Better Support Computer Science Education. SIGCSE Bull. 40, 4 (2008), 142--166. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schiaffino, S., Garcia, P., and Amandi, A.eTeacher: Providing personalized assistance to e-learning students. Computers & Education 51, 4 (2008), 1744--1754. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sharma, S.K. and Sefchek, J.Teaching information systems security courses: A hands-on approach. Computers & Security 26, 4 (2007), 290--299. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wang, Y.-S.Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management 41, 1 (2003), 75--86. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The Impact of Learning Style Adaptivity in Teaching Computer Security
Recommendations
An E-Learning Investigation into Learning Style Adaptivity
HICSS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System SciencesTraditional e-learning systems are typically designed for generic learners irrespective of individual requirements. In contrast, adaptive e-learning systems take into account learner characteristics such as learning style and level of knowledge in order ...
Design and Usability Evaluation of Adaptive e-learning Systems Based on Learner Knowledge and Learning Style
Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015AbstractDesigning effective adaptive e-learning systems, from a usability perspective, represents a challenge because of the complexity of adaptivity in order to meet the diverse requirements of learners. Furthermore, there is a lack of well-designed ...
Learning style based individualized adaptive e-learning environments
As for this study, it concentrates on learning styles based AEHs.69 articles published from 2005 to 2014 were reached.These studies were put subjected to document analysis.This study seeks the existing tendencies and gaps in literature. The studies on ...
Comments