skip to main content
10.1145/2774993.2775069acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Measuring control plane latency in SDN-enabled switches

Published:17 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Timely interaction between an SDN controller and switches is crucial to many SDN applications---e.g., fast rerouting during link failure and fine-grained traffic engineering in data centers. However, it is not well understood how the control plane in SDN switches impacts these applications. To this end, we conduct a comprehensive measurement study using four types of production SDN switches. Our measurements show that control actions, such as rule installation, have surprisingly high latency, due to both software implementation inefficiencies and fundamental traits of switch hardware.

References

  1. Private communication with Cristian Estan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. Benson, A. Anand, A. Akella, and M. Zhang. MicroTE: Fine Grained Traffic Engineering for Data Centers. In CoNEXT, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Casado, M. J. Freedman, J. Pettit, J. Luo, N. Gude, N. McKeown, and S. Shenker. Rethinking Enterprise Network Control. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. R. Curtis, J. C. Mogul, J. Tourrilhes, P. Yalagandula, P. Sharma, and S. Banerjee. DevoFlow: Scaling Flow Management for High-performance Networks. In SIGCOMM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. D. Ferguson, A. Guha, C. Liang, R. Fonseca, and S. Krishnamurthi. Participatory Networking: An API for Application Control of SDNs. In SIGCOMM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Heller, S. Seetharaman, P. Mahadevan, Y. Yiakoumis, P. Sharma, S. Banerjee, and N. McKeown. ElasticTree: Saving Energy in Data Center Networks. In NSDI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C.-Y. Hong, S. Kandula, R. Mahajan, M. Zhang, V. Gill, M. Nanduri, and R. Wattenhofer. Achieving High Utilization with Software-driven WAN. In SIGCOMM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Y. Huang, K. Yocum, and A. C. Snoeren. High-fidelity Switch Models for Software-defined Network Emulation. In HotSDN, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Jain, A. Kumar, S. Mandal, J. Ong, L. Poutievski, A. Singh, S. Venkata, J. Wanderer, J. Zhou, M. Zhu, et al. B4: Experience with A Globally-deployed Software Defined WAN. In SIGCOMM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. X. Jin, L. E. Li, L. Vanbever, and J. Rexford. SoftCell: Scalable and Flexible Cellular Core Network Architecture. In CoNEXT, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. X. Jin, H. H. Liu, R. Gandhi, S. Kandula, R. Mahajan, M. Zhang, J. Rexford, and R. Wattenhofer. Dynamic Scheduling of Network Updates. In SIGCOMM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. T. Koponen, M. Casado, N. Gude, J. Stribling, L. Poutievski, M. Zhu, R. Ramanathan, Y. Iwata, H. Inoue, T. Hama, et al. Onix: A Distributed Control Platform for Large-scale Production Networks. In OSDI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. H. H. Liu, X. Wu, M. Zhang, L. Yuan, R. Wattenhofer, and D. Maltz. zUpdate: Updating Data Center Networks with Zero Loss. In SIGCOMM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S. Shenker, and J. Turner. OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Olsson. Pktgen the Linux Packet Generator. In Ottawa Linux Symposium, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Patel, D. Bansal, L. Yuan, A. Murthy, A. Greenberg, D. A. Maltz, R. Kern, H. Kumar, M. Zikos, H. Wu, et al. Ananta: Cloud Scale Load Balancing. In SIGCOMM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. Rotsos, N. Sarrar, S. Uhlig, R. Sherwood, and A. W. Moore. Oflops: An Open Framework for Openflow Switch Evaluation. In PAM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Yu, J. Rexford, M. J. Freedman, and J. Wang. Scalable Flow-based Networking with DIFANE. In SIGCOMM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Measuring control plane latency in SDN-enabled switches

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SOSR '15: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCOMM Symposium on Software Defined Networking Research
              June 2015
              226 pages
              ISBN:9781450334518
              DOI:10.1145/2774993

              Copyright © 2015 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 17 June 2015

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • short-paper

              Acceptance Rates

              SOSR '15 Paper Acceptance Rate7of43submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate7of43submissions,16%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader