skip to main content
10.1145/2802612.2802615acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaiucdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparing Methodologies: Linked Open Data and Digital Libraries

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports the outcomes of the conversation moderated by Anna Maria Tammaro, which took place in Bologna during the third AIUCD (Associazione per l'Informatica Umanistica e la Cultura Digitale) conference, between Karen Coyle and Gianmaria Silvello about convergences and divergences of Cultural Heritage (CH) and Computer Science (CS) communities about digital libraries and the Linked Open Data (LOD) paradigm. The conversation has been stimulated in the context of the community of Digital Humanities (DH) scholars, in order to actively engaging them in the linked open data and digital libraries services.

The LOD paradigm is a promising technology not only for opening up digital libraries resources, but also for augmenting the discoverability, re-use, enrichment and sharing of their resources on the Web. For the digital libraries LOD can represent a quite significant shift from a "closed paradigm" where the domain expert (e.g. the librarian) has the control of the resources to an "open paradigm" where the resources are free to circulate and evolve "without" explicit control of domain experts.

In this paper we report some existing positive experiences of integration of the LOD paradigm in the digital library context where the LOD has been used as a publishing paradigm. We also discuss some limitations of the current approach by presenting some open problems that should be investigated to fully realize the LOD paradigm potentialities.

References

  1. Fox, E. A., Hix, D., Nowell, L. T., Brueni, D. J., Wake, W. C., Heath, L. S., and Rao, D. 1993. Users, User Interfaces, and Objects: Envision, a Digital Library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS) 44, 8, 480--491. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fox, E. A., Akscyn, R. M., Furuta, R. K., and Leggett, J. J. 1995. Digital Libraries. Communications of the ACM (CACM) 38, 4, 22--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Marchionini, G. and Maurer, H. 1995. The Roles of Digital Libraries in Teaching and Learning. Communications of the ACM (CACM) 38, 4, 67--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lesk, M. 1997. Practical Digital Libraries. Books, Bytes & Bucks. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, California, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Borgman, C.L. 1999. What are Digital Libraries? Competing Visions. Information Processing & Management 35, 3, 227--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Borgman, C. L. 2003. From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure: Access to Information in the Networked World (Digital Libraries and Electronic Publishing). The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA), USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lesk, M. 2005. Understanding Digital Libraries. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (CA), USA, 2nd edition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Witten, I. H., Bainbridge, D., and Nichols, D. M. 2009. How to Build a Digital Library. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (CA), USA, 2nd edition. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fox, E. A., Gonçalves, M. A., and Shen, R. 2012. Theoretical Foundations for Digital Libraries: The 5S (Societies, Scenarios, Spaces, Structures, Streams) Approach. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gonçalves, M. A., Fox, E. A., Watson, L. T., and Kipp, N. A. (2004). Streams, Structures, Spaces, Scenarios, Societies (5S): A Formal Model for Digital Libraries. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 22, 2, 270--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Candela, L., Castelli, D., Ferro, N., Koutrika, G., Meghini, C., Pagano, P., Ross, S., Soergel, D., Agosti, M., Dobreva, M., Katifori, V., and Schuldt, H. 2007a. The DELOS Digital Library Reference Model. Foundations for Digital Libraries (Version 0.96). ISTI-CNR at Gruppo ALI, Pisa, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferro, N. and Silvello, G. 2013b. NESTOR: A Formal Model for Digital Archives. Information Processing & Management 49, 6, 1206--1240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Doerr, M., Gradmann, S., Hennicke, S., Isaac, A., Meghini, C., and Van de Sompel, H. 2010. The Europeana Data Model (EDM). In IFLA 2011: World Library and Information Congress, 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, Gothenburg, Sweden. http://kennison.name/files/zopestore/uploads/metadata/europeana/presentation.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Heath, T. and Bizer, C. 2011. Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lagoze, C., Van De Sompel, H., Johnston, P., Nelson, M., Sanderson, R., and Warner, S. 2008. ORE Specification -- Abstract Data Model -- Version 1.00. http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/datamodel.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferro, N. and Silvello, G. 2013a. Modeling Archives by means of OAI-ORE. In M. Agosti, F. Esposito, S. Ferilli, and N. Ferro, Eds. Digital Libraries and Archives - Proc. 8th Italian Research Conference (IRCDL 2012), 216--227. Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS) 354, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Candela, L., Ioannidis, I., Koutrika, G., Ross, S., Schek, H. J., and Schuldt, H. 2007b. Setting the Foundations of Digital Libraries. D-Lib Magazine 13, 3/4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ioannidis, Y. E. 2005. Digital Libraries at a Crossroads. International Journal on Digital Libraries 5, 4, 255--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Silvello, G. 2011. A Set-Based Approach to Deal with Hierarchical Structures. PhD thesis, School of Information Engineering, Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Klyne, G. and Carroll, J. J. 2004. Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. Technical report, W3C.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. W3C 2014a. RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation, 25 February 2014. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. W3C 2014b. RDF 1.1: On Semantics of RDF Datasets, W3C Working Group Note. http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-rdf11-datasets-20140225/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Silvello, G. 2015. A Methodology for Citing Linked Open Data Subsets. D-Lib Magazine 21, 1/2. Available from January 15th, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Europeana. 2011. Europeana Data Model Primer. http://pro.europeana.eu/documents/900548/770bdb58-c60e-4beb-a687-874639312ba5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Europeana. 2012. Definition of the Europeana Data Model elements -- Version 5.2.3, 24 February 2012. http://pro.europeana.eu/documents/900548/bb6b51df-ad11-4a78-8d8a-44cc41810f22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Charles, V., Freire, N., and Isaac, A. 2014. Links, languages and semantics: linked data approaches in The European Library and Europeana. In 80th IFLA General Conference and Assembly 2014, Satellite Meeting Linked Data in Libraries: Let's make it happen! http://ifla2014-satdata.bnf.fr/pdf/iflalld2014_submission_Charles_Freire_Isaac.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoch, S. and Hayes, J. J. 2010. Geolinguistics: The Incorporation of Geographic Information Systems and Science. The Geographical Bulletin 51, 1, 23--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Di Buccio, E., Di Nunzio, G. M., and Silvello, G. 2014. A linked open data approach for geolinguistics applications. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies (IJMSO) 9, 1, 29--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Di Buccio, E., Di Nunzio, G. M., and Silvello, G. 2013. A Curated and Evolving Linguistic Linked Dataset. Semantic Web Journal 4, 3, 265--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Kaplan, D., Sauer, A., and Wilczek, E. 2011. Archival Description in OAI-ORE. Journal of Digital Information 12, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Light, M. and Hyry, T. 2002. Colophons and Annotations: New Directions for the Finding Aids. The American Archivists 65, 216--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Borgman, C. L. 2012. Why are the attribution and citation of scientific data important? In P. Uhlir, D. and Cohen, Eds. An International Symposium and Workshop. National Academy of Sciences' Board on Research Data and Information. National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Carroll, J. J., Bizer, C., Hayes, P., and Stickler, P. 2005. Named Graphs, Provenance and Trust. In A. Ellis, and T. Hagino, Eds. Proc. 14th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2005), 613--622. ACM Press, New York, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Comparing Methodologies: Linked Open Data and Digital Libraries

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AIUCD '14: Proceedings of the Third AIUCD Annual Conference on Humanities and Their Methods in the Digital Ecosystem
        September 2014
        119 pages
        ISBN:9781450332958
        DOI:10.1145/2802612

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 September 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader