skip to main content
10.1145/2818048.2819986acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Keeping Up with the Tweet-dashians: The Impact of 'Official' Accounts on Online Rumoring

Published:27 February 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper examines how 'official' accounts participate in the propagation and correction of online rumors in the context of crisis events. Using an emerging method for interpretive analysis of 'big' social data, we investigate the spread of online rumors through digital traces-in this case, tweets. Our study suggests that official accounts can help to slow the spread of a rumor by posting a denial, and-supported by reflections from an organization that recently dealt with a rumor-crisis-offers best practices for organizations around social media strategies and protocols. Based on tweet data and connections to existing literature, we also demonstrate and discuss how mainstream media participate in rumoring, and note the role of a new breed of online media, 'breaking news' accounts. This analysis offers a complementary perspective to existing studies that use surveys and interviews to characterize the role official accounts play in online rumoring.

References

  1. About Twitter, Inc. About. 2015. Retrieved May 20, 2015 from https://about.twitter.com/companyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. David E. Alexander. 2014. Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management. Science and Engineering Ethics 20, 3: 717–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9502-zGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Gordon W. Allport and Leo Postman. 1946. An analysis of rumor. Public Opinion Quarterly 10, 4: 501-517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kenneth M. Anderson, Ahmet Arif Aydin, Mario Barrenechea, Adam Cardenas, Mazin Hakeem, and Sahar Jambi. 2015. Design Challenges/Solutions for Environments Supporting the Analysis of Social Media Data in Crisis Informatics Research. In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 163-172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lucinda Austin, Brooke Fisher Liu, Yan Jin. 2012. How Audiences Seek Out Crisis Information: Exploring the Social-Mediated Crisis Communication Model. J of Applied Comm. Research 40, 2: 188–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.654498Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. William L. Benoit. 1997. Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review 23, 2: 177–186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S03638111(97)90023-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Deanne Bird, Megan Ling, Katherine Haynes. 2012. Flooding Facebook: The use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 27, 1: 27–33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rowena L. Briones, Beth Kuch, Brooke Fisher Liu, Yan Jin. 2011. Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review 37,1: 37-43. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Axel Bruns, Yuxian Eugene Liang. 2012. Tools and methods for capturing Twitter data during natural disasters. First Monday,17,4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i4.3937Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Theodore Caplow. 1947. Rumors in war, Social Forces, 298-302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kay L. Colley, Amy Collier. 2009. An Overlooked Social Media Tool? Making a Case for Wikis, Public Relations Strategist, 34–35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Carl von Clausewitz. 1976. On War. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Adam Crowe. 2011. The social media manifesto: A comprehensive review of the impact of social media on emergency management. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning 5, 1: 409-420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nicholas DiFonzo, Prashant Bordia. 2007. Rumor psychology: Social and organizational approaches. American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/11503-000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Samantha Finn, Panagiotis Takis Metaxas, Eni Mustafaraj, Megan O'Keefe, Lindsay Tang, Susan Tang, Laura Zeng. 2014. TRAILS: A system for monitoring the propagation of rumors on twitter. In Computation and Journalism Symposium, NYC, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Karen Freberg. 2012. Intention to comply with crisis messages communicated via social media. Public Relations Review 38, 3: 416–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Alfonso González-Herrero, Suzanne Smith. 2008. Crisis Communications Management on the Web: How Internet-Based Technologies are Changing the Way Public Relations Professionals Handle Business Crises. J. of Contingencies and Crisis Management 16, 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Starr R. Hiltz, Jane Kushma, Linda Plotnick. 2014. Use of Social Media by U.S. Public Sector Emergency Managers: Barriers and Wish Lists. In Proceedings of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM '14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J B. Houston, Joshua Hawthorne, Mildred F. Perreault, Eun H. Park, Marlo G. Hode, Michael R. Halliwell, Sarah E. Turner McGowen, Rachel Davis, Shivani Vaid, Jonathan A. McElderry, Stanford A. Griffith. 2012. Social media use during disasters: A review of the knowledge base and gaps. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Brian Houston, Joshua Hawthorne, Mildred F. Perreault, Eun Hae Park, Marlo Goldstein Hode, Michael R. Halliwell, Sarah E. Turner McGowen, Rachel Davis, Shivani Vaid, Jonathan A. McElderry, Stanford A. Griffith. 2014. Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters 39, 1: 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/disa.12092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Linlin Huang, Kate Starbird, Mania Orand, Stephanie Stanek, Heather Pedersen. 2015. Connected Through Crisis: Emotional Proximity and the Spread of Misinformation Online. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Amanda L. Hughes, Leysia Palen. 2012. The Evolving Role of the Public Information Officer: An Examination of Social Media in Emergency Management. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 9,1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/1547-7355.1976Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Yan Jin, Brooke F. Liu, Lucinda L. Austin. 2011. Examining the role of social media in effective crisis management: The effects of crisis origin, information form, and source on publics' crisis responses. Communication Research, 0093650211423918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650211423918Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Andrea L. Kavanaugh, Edward A. Fox, Steven D. Sheetz, Seungwon Ya, Lin Tzy Li, Donald J. Shoemaker, Apostol Natsev, Lexing Xie. 2012. Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical. Government Information Quarterly 29, 4: 480– 491. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Eugenia C. Kiesling. 2001. Fog on War without the Fog. Military Review 81, 5: 85-86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Brooke Fisher Liu, Julia Daisy Fraustino, Yan Jin. 2014. How Disaster Information Form, Source, Type, and Prior Disaster Exposure Affect Public Outcomes: Jumping on the Social Media Bandwagon? Journal of Applied Communication Research 43, 1: 44–65. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1080/00909882.2014.982685Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Jim Maddock, Kate Starbird, Haneen J. Al-Hassani, Daniel E. Sandoval, Mania Orand, and Robert M. Mason. 2015. Characterizing Online Rumoring Behavior Using Multi-Dimensional Signatures. In Proceedings of Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 228-241. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2675133.2675280 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Meredith R. Morris, Scott Counts, Asta Roseway, Aaron Hoff, Julia Schwarz. 2012. Tweeting is believing? Understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In Proc. of 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12), 441-450. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1145/2145204.2145274 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Nic Newman. 2011. Mainstream media and the distribution of news in the age of social discovery. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Onnok Oh, Manish Agrawal, H R. Rao. 2013. Community intelligence and social media services: a rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. Mis Quarterly 37, 2: 407-426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Onnok Oh, Kyounghee H. Kwon, H R. Rao. 2010. An Exploration of Social Media in Extreme Events: Rumor Theory and Twitter during the Haiti Earthquake 2010. In Proceeding of The International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS '10), 231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Eva-Karin Olsson. 2008. Crisis Communication in Public Organizations: Dimensions of Dimensions of Crisis Communication Revisited. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 22, 2:113–125. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12047Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ralph L. Rosnow. 1980. Psychology of rumor reconsidered. Psychological Bulletin 87, 3: 578-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.3.578Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Yee San, Su Clarence, Wardell Iii, Zoë Thorkildsen, Monica Giovachino. 2013. Social Media in the Emergency Management Field: 2012 Survey Results. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1 .1.357.3121Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Mike Schmierbach, Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch. 2012. A Little Bird Told Me, So I Didn't Believe It: Twitter, Credibility, and Issue Perceptions. Communication Quarterly 60, 3: 317–337. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1080/01463373.2012.688723Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Tamotsu Shibutani. 1966. Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor. Ardent Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Irina Shklovski, Leysia Palen, Jeannette Sutton. 2008. Finding community through information and communication technology in disaster response. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '08). 127-136. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1145/1460563.1460584 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Irina Shklovski, Moira Burke, Sara Kiesler, Robert Kraut. 2010. Technology adoption and use in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. American Behavioral Scientist 53, 8: 1228–1246. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1177/0002764209356252Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Brian G. Smith. (2010). Socially distributing public relations: Twitter, Haiti, and interactivity in social media. Public Relations Review, 36(4), 329–335. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.08.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Jeannette Sutton, Leysia Palen, Irina Shklovski. 2008. Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent uses of social media in the 2007 Southern California wildfires. In Proceedings of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM '08), 624-632. https://www.cs.colorado.edu/~palen/Papers/iscram08/B ackchannelsISCRAM08.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Mel Taylor, Garrett Wells, Gwyneth Howell, Beverley Raphael. 2012. The role of social media as psychological first aid as a support to community resilience building. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 27, 1: 20–26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Shari R. Veil, Tara Burhner, Michael J. Palenchar. 2011. A Work-In-Process Literature Review: Incorporating Social Media in Risk and Crisis Communication. Journal of contingencies and crisis management 19, 2: 110-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2011.00639.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Cécile Wendling, Jack Radisch, Stephane Jacobzone. 2013. The Use of Social Media in Risk and Crisis Communication. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3v01fskp9s-enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Robby Westbrook, Tammy Karlgaard, Connie White, Josalyn Knapic. 2012. A holistic approach to evaluating social media's successful implementation into emergency management operations: Applied research in an action research study. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management 4, 3: 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jiscrm.2012070101Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Kim Witte. 1995. Generating effective risk messages: how scary should your risk communication be. In B.R. Burleson (ed.) Communication Yearbook 18: 229–254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Zogby Interactive. 2009. Poll: Online news sources top all others. Retrieved June 20, 2009 from http://pww.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Keeping Up with the Tweet-dashians: The Impact of 'Official' Accounts on Online Rumoring

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '16: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
      February 2016
      1866 pages
      ISBN:9781450335928
      DOI:10.1145/2818048

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 February 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate142of571submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader