Fatima Kaloti-Hallak
Mordechai (Moti) Ben-Ari
ABSTRACT
This work investigates students' attitudes towards and motivation for learning robotics and STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). The population consisted of middle-school students (ages 13-15 years) who participated in the FIRST® LEGO® League competition. The methodology used both qualitative and quantitative instruments: questionnaires, observations and interviews during the school year 2012--2013. Research continued with one group during 2013--2014. Four categories were investigated: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, self-determination and self-efficacy, as well as other environmental factors (gender, peers, parents and teachers). The results showed no significant difference between the beginning and end of the activities on all the categories. We consider this as a positive indicator, since most of the students demonstrated high and positive attitudes toward and motivation for learning robotics at the beginning of the activities and maintained the results after the activities. The environmental factors played an important role in positively influencing students' attitudes and motivation. In particular, females showed more positive attitudes and motivation at the end of the activities.
- Anderson, M., McKenzie, A., Wellman, B., Brown, M., & Vrbsky, S. 2011. Affecting Attitudes in First-year Computer Science using Syntax-free Robotics Programming. ACM Indroads, 2(3), 51--57. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Apiola, M., Lattu, M. & Pasanen, T. 2010. Creativity and Intrinsic Motivation in Computer Science Education: Experimenting with Robots. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE'10). 199--203. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Avsec, S., Rihtarsic, D. & Kocijancic, S. 2014. A Predictive Study of Learner Attitudes Toward Open Learning in Roboitcs Class. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 23. Springer, New York 692--704.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. 1982. Self-efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist 37, 122--147Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
- Chi, M. 1997. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271--315.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fortus, D. 2014. Attending to Affect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 821--835.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. 2011. Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with Science Majors and Nonscience Majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1--18.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lauwers, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Hamner, I. 2009. CSbots: Design and Deployment of a Robot Designed for the CS1 Classroom. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 428--432. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McGill, M. M. 2012. Learning to Program with Personal Robots: Influences on Student Motivation. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 12(1). 1--32 Google ScholarDigital Library
- McWhorter, W., & O'Connor, B., 2009. Do LEGO Mindstorms motivate students in CS1?. ACM SIGCSE'09 Bulletin 41(1). 438--442. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Melchior, A., Cohen, F., Cutter, T., & Leavitt, T. 2005. More than Robots: An Evaluation of the FIRST Robotics Competition Participant and Institutional Impacts: Center for Youth and Communities, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
- Miller, D. P., & Stein, C. 2000. (So That's Pi is For!) and Other Educational Epiphanies from Hands-on Robotics: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
- Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. 2003. Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049--1079.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pintrich, R. R., & DeGroot, E. V. 1990. Motivational and Self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33--40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68--78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. 2011. Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 199--216.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Verner, I. M., & Ahlgren, D. J. 2004. Robot Contest as a Laboratory for Experiential Engineering Education. ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 4(2), 1--15. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Students' Attitudes and Motivation During Robotics Activities
Recommendations
The effect of robotics activities on students' learning and attitudes
ICER '14: Proceedings of the tenth annual conference on International computing education researchMy research investigates students' learning of and attitudes toward STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) in general and Computer Science (CS) in particular during their participation in robotics activities. The research population ...
Attitudes of individuals with visual impairments towards distance education
The aims of this work were to examine the attitudes of individuals with visual impairments towards distance education (DE) and the relationships between attitudes and participants' personal characteristics. Forty-one adults with visual impairments, who ...
Comments