skip to main content
10.1145/2838944.2838953acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrehabConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Proposed Design Approach for an Interactive Feedback Technology Support in Rehabilitation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 October 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite the anticipated benefits associated with the use of interactive feedback tools, the adoption of these technologies into clinical practice has not yet been widespread. Initial usability studies and anecdotal evidence suggests that interactive technology supports are effective in rehabilitation, yet they don't seem to satisfy the needs or the expectations of clinicians and patients. This paper outlines a proposed approach to the design, development and selection of interactive technology supports for use in rehabilitation. The proposed process comprises seven stages; 1) understanding the clinical challenge, 2) identify the benefits that a technology support may offer, 3) devise a modified care pathway, 4) outline the design specification for an interactive technology support, 5) ascertain whether other solutions exist, 6) develop interactive platform, 7) and finally evaluate. In this paper we outline this approach using orthopaedic rehabilitation as a specific example, however the same basic principles can be applied to many different rehabilitation groups.

References

  1. van den Heuvel, M.R.C, Kwakkel, G., Beek, P.J., Berendse, H.W., Daffertshofer, A., and van Wegen, E.E.H. 2014. Effects of augmented visual feedback during balance training in Parkinson's disease: A pilot randomized clinical trial. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders. 12:1352--1358. DOI= http://10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.09.022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Lange, B., Chang, C.Y., Suma, E., Newman, B., Rizzo, A.S., and Bolas, M. 2011. Development and evaluation of low cost game-based balance rehabilitation tool using the Microsoft Kinect sensor. 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC. Boston, MA, USA. DOI= http://10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090521Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Brichetto, G., Spallarossa, P., de Carvalho, M.L., and Battaglia, M.A. 2013. The effect of Nintendo® Wii® on balance in people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized control study. Multiple Sclerosis. 19(9):1219--1221. DOI= http://10.1177/1352458512472747.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. WHO. Chronic Rheumatic Conditions. Fact Sheet. Geneva: 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennell, K.L., and Hinman, R.S. 2011. A review of the clinical evidence for exercise in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Journal of science and medicine in sport / Sports Medicine Australia. 14(1):4--9. DOI= http://10.1016/j.jsams.2010.08.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Roddy, E., Zhang, W., and Doherty, M. 2005. Aerobic walking or strengthening exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee: A systematic review. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 64(4):544--548.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fransen, M., McConnell, S., and Bell, M. 2002. Therapeutic exercise for people with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. A systematic review. The Journal of Rheumatology. 29(8):1737--1745.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartels, E.M., Lund, H., Hagen, K.B., Dagfinrud, H., Christensen, R., Danneskiold-Samsoe, B. 2007. Aquatic exercise for the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedrich, M., Cermak, T., and Maderbacher, P. 1996. The effect of brochure use versus therapist teaching on patients performing therapeutic exercise and on changes in impairment status. Physical Therapy. 76(10):1082--1088.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Martin-Moreno, J., Ruiz-Fernandez, D., Soriano-Paya, A., and Berenguer-Miralles, V.J. 2008. Monitoring 3D movements for the rehabilitation of joints in physiotherapy. 2008 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. DOI= http://10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bassett, S.F. 2003. The assessment of patient adherence to physiotherapy rehabilitation. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy. 31(2):60--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cameirao, M.D.S., Badia, S.B.I., Duarte, E., and Verschure, P.F.M.J. 2011. Virtual reality based rehabilitation speeds up functional recovery of the upper extremities after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study in the acute phase of stroke using the Rehabilitation Gaming System. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 29(5):287--298. DOI= http://10.3233/RNN-2011-0599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Henderson, A., Korner-Bitensky, N., and Levin, M. 2007. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recover. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 14(2):52--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Linde, S.M., Reiss, A., Buchanan, S., Sahu, K., Rosenfeldt, A.B., Clark, C., Wolf, S.L., and Alberts, J.L. 2013. Incorporating robotic-assisted telerehabilitation in a home program to improve arm function following stroke. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy. 37 (3):125--132. DOI= http://10.1097/NPT.0b013e31829fa808.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Russell, T., Buttrum, P., Wootton, R., and Jull, G. 2011. Internet based outpatient telerehbailitation for patients following total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 93(2):113--120. DOI= http://10.2106/JBJS.I.01375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Tousignant, M., Moffet, H., Boissy, P., Corriveau, H., Cabana, F., and Marquis, F. 2011. A randomized controlled trial of home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 17:195--198. DOI= http://10.1258/jtt.2010.100602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Tousignant, M., Moffet, H., Nadeau, S., Merette, C., Boissy, P., Corriveau, H., Marquis, F., Cabana, F., Ranger, P., Belzile, É.L., and Dimentberg, R. 2015. Cost Analysis of In-Home Telerehabilitation for Post-Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Medical Internet Research.17(3):e83. DOI= http://10.2196/jmir.3844.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Fung, V., Ho, A., Shaffer, J., Chung, E., and Gomez, M. 2012. Use of Nintendo Wii Fit™ in the rehabilitation of outpatients following total knee replacement: a preliminary randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 98(3):183--188. DOI= http://10.1016/j.physio.2012.04.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Negus, J.J., Cawthorne, D.P., Chen, J., Scholes, C.J., Parker, D.A., and March, L.M. 2015. Patient outcomes using Wii-enhanced rehabilitation after total knee replacement - the TKR-POWER study. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 40:47--53. DOI= http://10.1016/j.cct.2014.11.007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Brutovsky, J., and Novák, D. 2006. Low-cost motivated rehabilitation system for post-operation exercises. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC. New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tseng, Y.C., Wu, C.H., Wu, F.J., Huang, C.F., King, C.T., Lin, C.Y., Sheu, J.P., Chen, C.Y., Lo, C.Y., Yang, C.W., and Deng, C.W. 2009. A wireless human motion capturing system for home rehabilitation. The International Conference of Mobile Data Management. Taipei, Taiwan. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Milenkovic, M., Jovanov, E., Chapman, J., Raskovic, D., and Price, J. 2002. An accelerometer-based physical rehabilitation system. The Thirty-Fourth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory. Huntsville, Alabama, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen, K., Chen, P., Liu, K., and Chan, C. 2015. Wearable Sensor-Based Rehabilitation Exercise Assessment for Knee Osteoarthritis. Sensors (Basel). 15(2):4193--4211. DOI= http://10.3390/s150204193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Taylor, P.E., Almeida, G.J.M., Hodgins, J.K., and Kanade, T. 2012. Multi-label classification for the analysis of human motion quality. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC. San Diego, Calafornia, USA. DOI= http://10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Piqueras, M., Marc, E., Coll, M., Escalada, F., Ballester, A., Cinca, C., Belmonte, R., and Muniesa, J.M. 2013. Effectiveness of an interactive virtual telerehabilitation system in patients after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2013;45:392--396. DOI= http://10.2340/16501977-1119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ayoade, M., and Baillie, L. 2014. A novel knee rehabilitation system for the home. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. Toronto, ON, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Giggins, O.M., Sweeney, K.T., and Caulfield, B. 2014. Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation.11:158. DOI= http://0.1186/1743-0003-11-158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Proposed Design Approach for an Interactive Feedback Technology Support in Rehabilitation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      REHAB '15: Proceedings of the 3rd 2015 Workshop on ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques
      October 2015
      176 pages
      ISBN:9781450338981
      DOI:10.1145/2838944

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 October 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader