skip to main content
research-article

Multi-item auctions defying intuition?

Published:12 November 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The best way to sell n items to a buyer who values each of them independently and uniformly randomly in [c, c+1] is to bundle them together, as long as c is large enough. Still, for any c, the grand bundling mechanism is never optimal for large enough n, despite the sharp concentration of the buyer's total value for the items as n grows. Optimal multi-item mechanisms are rife with unintuitive properties, making multi-item generalizations of Myerson's celebrated mechanism a daunting task. We survey recent work on the structure and computational complexity of revenue-optimal multi-item mechanisms, providing structural as well as algorithmic generalizations of Myerson's result to multi-item settings.

References

  1. Alaei, S., Fu, H., Haghpanah, N., Hartline, J., and Malekian, A. 2012. Bayesian Optimal Auctions via Multi- to Single-agent Reduction. In the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alaei, S., Fu, H., Haghpanah, N., and Hartline, J. D. 2013. The Simple Economics of Approximately Optimal Auctions. In the 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Anderson, E. J. and Nash, P. 1987. Linear Programming in Infinite-Dimensional Spaces: Theory and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Babaioff, M., Immorlica, N., Lucier, B., and Weinberg, S. M. 2014. A Simple and Approximately Optimal Mechanism for an Additive Buyer. In the 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bhalgat, A., Gollapudi, S., and Munagala, K. 2013. Optimal Auctions via the Multiplicative Weight Method. In the 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Border, K. C. 1991. Implementation of Reduced Form Auctions: A Geometric Approach. Econometrica 59, 4, 1175--1187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Border, K. C. 2007. Reduced Form Auctions Revisited. Economic Theory 31, 167--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Briest, P., Chawla, S., Kleinberg, R., and Weinberg, S. M. 2010. Pricing Randomized Allocations. In the Twenty-First Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cai, Y. and Daskalakis, C. 2011. Extreme-Value Theorems for Optimal Multidimensional Pricing. In the 52nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., and Weinberg, S. M. 2012a. An Algorithmic Characterization of Multi-Dimensional Mechanisms. In the 44th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., and Weinberg, S. M. 2012b. Optimal Multi-Dimensional Mechanism Design: Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization. In the 53rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., and Weinberg, S. M. 2013a. Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization : Approximation Algorithms and other Generalizations. In the 24th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., and Weinberg, S. M. 2013b. Understanding Incentives: Mechanism Design Becomes Algorithm Design. In the 54th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., and Weinberg, S. M. 2015. Reducing Bayesian Mechanism Design to Algorithm Design. Encyclopedia of Algorithms.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cai, Y. and Huang, Z. 2013. Simple and Nearly Optimal Multi-Item Auctions. In the 24th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Chawla, S., Hartline, J. D., and Kleinberg, R. D. 2007. Algorithmic Pricing via Virtual Valuations. In the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Chawla, S., Hartline, J. D., Malec, D. L., and Sivan, B. 2010. Multi-Parameter Mechanism Design and Sequential Posted Pricing. In the 42nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Chawla, S. and Sivan, B. 2014. Bayesian Algorithmic Mechanism Design. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 13, 1, 5--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Che, Y.-K., Kim, J., and Mierendorff, K. 2011. Generalized Reduced-Form Auctions: A Network-Flow Approach. Econometrica 81, 6, 2487--2520.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, X., Diakonikolas, I., Paparas, D., Sun, X., and Yannakakis, M. 2014. The Complexity of Optimal Multidimensional Pricing. In the 25th Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Daskalakis, C. Spring 2015. Lecture 21. In Decision, Games, and Computation. EECS, MIT. https://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/6/sp15/6.891/index.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Daskalakis, C., Deckelbaum, A., and Tzamos, C. 2012. Optimal Pricing is Hard. In the 8th Workshop on Internet & Network Economics (WINE). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Daskalakis, C., Deckelbaum, A., and Tzamos, C. 2013. Mechanism Design via Optimal Transport. In the 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Daskalakis, C., Deckelbaum, A., and Tzamos, C. 2014. The Complexity of Optimal Mechanism Design. In the 25th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Daskalakis, C., Deckelbaum, A., and Tzamos, C. 2015. Strong Duality for a Multiple-Good Monopoly. In the 16th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Daskalakis, C., Devanur, N., and Weinberg, S. M. 2015. Revenue Maximization and Ex-Post Budget Constraints. In the 16th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Daskalakis, C. and Weinberg, S. M. 2015. Bayesian Truthful Mechanisms for Job Scheduling from Bi-criterion Approximation Algorithms. In the 26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Giannakopoulos, Y. and Koutsoupias, E. 2014. Duality and Optimality of Auctions for Uniform Distributions. In the 15th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Hart, S. and Nisan, N. 2012. Approximate Revenue Maximization with Multiple Items. In the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Hart, S. and Nisan, N. 2013. The Menu-Size Complexity of Auctions. In the 14th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Hart, S. and Reny, P. 2012. Maximal Revenue with Multiple Goods: Nonmonotonicity and Other Observations. Center for the Study of Rationality.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Hart, S. and Reny, P. J. 2014. Implementation of Reduced Form Mechanisms: A Simple Approach and a New Characterization. Economic Theory Bulletin 3, 1, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Hartline, J. D. 2013. Bayesian Mechanism Design. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science 8, 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Li, X. and Yao, A. C.-C. 2013. On Revenue Maximization for Selling Multiple Independently Distributed Items. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 28, 11232--11237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Luenberger, D. G. 1968. Optimization by Vector Space Methods. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Manelli, A. and Vincent, D. 2006. Bundling as an Optimal Selling Mechanism for a Multiple-Good Monopolist. Journal of Economic Theory 127, 1, 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Manelli, A. M. and Vincent, D. R. 2007. Multidimensional Mechanism Design: Revenue Maximization and the Multiple-Good Monopoly. Journal of Economic Theory 137, 1, 153--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Myerson, R. B. 1981. Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 1, 58--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Pavlov, G. 2011. Optimal Mechanism for Selling Two Goods. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 11, 1 (February), 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Riley, J. and Zeckhauser, R. 1983. Optimal Selling Strategies: When to Haggle, When to Hold Firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 267--289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Rochet, J.-C. 1987. A Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Rationalizability in a Quasi-Linear Context. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16, 2 (April), 191--200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Rochet, J.-C. and Stole, L. A. 2003. The Economics of Multidimensional Screening. Econometric Society Monographs 35, 150--197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Roughgarden, T. 2015. Approximately Optimal Mechanism Design: Motivation, Examples, and Lessons Learned. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 13, 2, 4--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Rubinstein, A. and Weinberg, S. M. 2015. Simple Mechanisms for a Subadditive Buyer and Applications to Revenue Monotonicity. In the 16th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Tzamos, C. 2015. Optimal Mechanisms for Pairs of Beta Distributions. http://christos.me/betas.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Yao, A. C. 2015. An n-to-1 Bidder Reduction for Multi-item Auctions and its Applications. In the 26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multi-item auctions defying intuition?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGecom Exchanges
      ACM SIGecom Exchanges  Volume 14, Issue 1
      June 2015
      107 pages
      EISSN:1551-9031
      DOI:10.1145/2845926
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2015 Author

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 November 2015

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader