skip to main content
column

Mastering Situation Awareness: The Next Big Challenge?

Published:03 December 2015Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

John Boyd recognized in the 1960's the importance of situation awareness for military operations and introduced the notion of the OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, and Act). Today we realize that many applications have to deal with situation awareness: Customer Relationship Management, Human Capital Management, Supply Chain Management, patient care, power grid management, and cloud services management, as well as any IoT (Internet of Things) related application; the list seems to be endless. Situation awareness requires applications to support the management of data, knowledge, processes, and other services such as social networking in an integrated way. These applications additionally require high personalization as well as rapid and continuous evolution. They must provide a wide variety of operational and functional requirements, including real time processing.

Handcrafting these applications is an almost impossible task requiring exhaustive resources for development and maintenance. Due to the resources and time involved in their development, these applications typically fall way short of the desired functionality, operational characteristics, and ease and speed of evolution. We - the authors - have developed a model enabling the development and maintenance of situation-aware applications in a declarative and therefore economical manner; we call this model KIDS - Knowledge Intensive Data-processing System.

References

  1. Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M., Vapnik, V.N., 1992, A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Boyd, J.R., 1976. Destruction and Creation. U.S. Army Command and General Staff College.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, E.S., Behrend, A., Gawlick, D., Ghoneimy, A., Liu, Z.H., 2012, Towards a Synergistic Model for Managing Data, Knowledge, Processes, and Social Interaction, SDPS-2012, Society for Design and Process Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan E.S., Gawlick D., Ghoneimy A., and Liu Z.H., "Situation Aware Computing for Big Data," SemBIoT 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng, S., Pecht, M., 2007, Multivariate State Estimation Technique for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Electronic Products, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Crankshaw, D., Bailis, P., Gonzalez, J., Li, H., Zhang, Z., Franklin, M., Ghodsi, A., Jordan, Mi: The Missing Piece in Complex Analysis: Low Latency, Scalable Model Management and Serving with VELOX, CIDR 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dempster, A.P., 1968, A generalization of Bayesian Inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D.I. Spivak: "Category Theory for the Scientists," ISBN-13: 978-0262028134 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fletcher, R., 1970, Generalized Inverses for Nonlinear Equations and Optimization. Numerical Methods for Non-Linear Algebraic Equations. Gordon and Breach, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gawlick, D., Ghoneimy, A., Liu, Z.H., 2011, How to Build a Modern Patient Care Application. HEALTHINF.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilmour D.L, et al. 2003, Automatic Management of Terms in a User Profile in a Knowledge Management System. United States Patent 6,640,229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Guerra, D., Gawlick, U., Bizarro, P., Gawlick, D., 2011, An Integrated Data Management Approach to Manage Health Care Data. BTW 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Horvitz, E., Mitchell, T., 2010. From Data to knowledge to Action: A Global Enabler for the 21st Century. Data Analytic Series, Computing Community Consortium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Howard, R.A., Matheson, J.E., 1984, Influence Diagrams. Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, v.2. Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OODA_loopGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Situation_awarenessGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. http://mjolnir.cse.buffalo.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. https://www3.uni-bonn.de/idb/research/statesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. http://www.cs.iit.edu/~dbgroup/research/gprom.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. http://www.cs.iit.edu/~dbgroup/research/oracletprov.phpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kokar, M.M., Matheus, C.J., Baclawski, K., (2009), Ontology-based situation awareness, Journal Information Fusion, Vol 10, Issue 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Koller, D., Friedman, N., 2009, Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Liu, Z.H., Behrend, A., Chan, E., Gawlick, D., Ghoneimy A., KIDS - A Model for Developing Evolutionary Database Applications. DATA 2012: 129--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu Z.H., Gawlick, D., Management of Flexible Schema Data in RDBMSs, CIDR 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Shafer, G., 1976, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader