René F. Kizilcec
Mar Pérez-Sanagustín
ABSTRACT
Many committed learners struggle to achieve their goal of completing a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). This work investigates self-regulated learning (SRL) in MOOCs and tests if encouraging the use of SRL strategies can improve course performance. We asked a group of 17 highly successful learners about their own strategies for how to succeed in a MOOC. Their responses were coded based on a SRL framework and synthesized into seven recommendations. In a randomized experiment, we evaluated the effect of providing those recommendations to learners in the same course (N = 653). Although most learners rated the study tips as very helpful, the intervention did not improve course persistence or achievement. Results suggest that a single SRL prompt at the beginning of the course provides insufficient support. Instead, embedding technological aids that adaptively support SRL throughout the course could better support learners in MOOCs.
- R. Azevedo, D.C. Moos, J.A. Greene, F.I. Winters, & J.G. Cromley. 2008. Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research & Development 56, 1: 45--72.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. Bannert & C. Mengelkamp. 2013. Scaffolding Hypermedia Learning Through Metacognitive Prompts. In International Handbook of Metacognition & Learning Technologies Springer International Handbooks of Education. 171--186.Google Scholar
- L. Breslow, D. Pritchard, J. DeBoer, G. Stump, A. Ho, & D. Seaton. 2013. Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX's first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment 8: 13--25.Google Scholar
- J. Broadbent & W. Poon. 2015. Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet & Higher Education 27: 1--13.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A.D. Ho, I. Chuang, J. Reich, et al. 2015. HarvardX & MITx : Two Years of Open Online Courses Fall 2012- Summer 2014. SSRN Electronic Journal, 10: 1--37.Google Scholar
- R.F. Kizilcec & S. Halawa. 2015. Attrition & Achievement Gaps in Online Learning. Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Learning@Scale, 57--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R.F. Kizilcec, C. Piech, & E. Schneider. 2013. Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses. Proceeding s of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 170--179. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R.F. Kizilcec & E. Schneider. 2015. Motivation as a Lens to Understand Online Learners: Toward Data-Driven Design with the OLEI Scale. Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions (TOCHI) 22, 2: 24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Lin & J.D. Lehman. 1999. Supporting Learning of Variable Control in a Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of Prompting College Students to Reflect on Their Own Thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36, 7: 837--858.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Littlejohn, N. Hood, C. Milligan, & P. Mustain. 2016. Learning in MOOCs: Motivations & self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet & Higher Education 29: 40--48.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P.R. Pintrich. 1999. The role of motivation in promoting & sustaining self-regulated learning. International journal of educational research 31, 6: 459--470.Google Scholar
- P.R. Pintrich. 2000. The Role of Goal Orientation in Self- Regulated Learning. In Handbook of Self-Regulation, Monique Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (eds.). Academic Press, 451--502.Google Scholar
- M. Taub, R. Azevedo, F. Bouchet, & B. Khosravifar. 2014. Can the use of cognitive & metacognitive self-regulated learning strategies be predicted by learners' levels of prior knowledge in hypermedia-learning environments? Computers in Human Behavior 39: 356--367. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Virtanen, H. Niemi, A. Nevgi, O. Raehalme, & A. Launonen. 2003. Towards strategic learning skills through self-assessment & tutoring in web-based environment. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
- S. Zheng, M.B. Rosson, P.C. Shih, & J.M. Carroll. 2015. Understanding Student Motivation, Behaviors & Perceptions in MOOCs. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15: 1882--1895. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Zhenghao, B. Alcorn, G. Christensen, N. Eriksson, D. Koller, & E. Emanuel. 2015. Who's Benefiting from MOOCs, & Why. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
- B.J. Zimmerman. 2015. Self-Regulated Learning: Theories, Measures, & Outcomes. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Recommending Self-Regulated Learning Strategies Does Not Improve Performance in a MOOC
Recommendations
Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses
Individuals with strong self-regulated learning (SRL) skills, characterized by the ability to plan, manage and control their learning process, can learn faster and outperform those with weaker SRL skills. SRL is critical in learning environments that ...
Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments
Self-regulated learning with the Internet or hypermedia requires not only cognitive learning strategies, but also specific and general meta-cognitive strategies. The purposes of the Study2000 project, carried out at the TU Dresden, were to develop and ...
Ontologies for Self-Regulated Learning
Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovations Informed by the Learning Sciences: Sharing Good Practices of Research, Experimentation and InnovationSelf-regulated learning is the key for students to be masters of their own learning processes. These self-initiated processes enable these students to become controllers of their learning experiences. The objective of this research is to maximize the ...
Comments