skip to main content
10.1145/2909824.3020222acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adaptive Robot Language Tutoring Based on Bayesian Knowledge Tracing and Predictive Decision-Making

Published:06 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present an approach to adaptive language tutoring in child-robot interaction. The approach is based on a dynamic probabilistic model that represents the inter-relations between the learner's skills, her observed behaviour in tutoring interaction, and the tutoring action taken by the system. Being implemented in a robot language tutor, the model enables the robot tutor to trace the learner's knowledge and to decide which skill to teach next and how to address it in a game-like tutoring interaction. Results of an evaluation study are discussed demonstrating how participants in the adaptive tutoring condition successfully learned foreign language words.

References

  1. K. Bergmann and M. Macedonia. A Virtual Agent as Vocabulary Trainer: Iconic Gestures Help to Improve Learners' Memory Performance, pages 139--148. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. E. Berlyne. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. 1960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Cakmak and M. Lopes. Algorithmic and human teaching of sequential decision tasks. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-12), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Clement, D. Roy, P.-Y. Oudeyer, and M. Lopes. Multi-armed bandits for intelligent tutoring systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.3174, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. T. Corbett and J. R. Anderson. Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User modeling and user-adapted interaction, 4(4):253--278, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. G. Core and J. Allen. Coding dialogs with the damsl annotation scheme. In AAAI fall symposium on communicative action in humans and machines, volume 56. Boston, MA, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. Craig, A. Graesser, J. Sullins, and B. Gholson. Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with autotutor. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3):241--250, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. C. Dede. A review and synthesis of recent research in intelligent computer-assisted instruction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24(4):329--353, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Engeser and F. Rheinberg. Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3):158--172, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. Fridin. Storytelling by a kindergarten social assistive robot: A tool for constructive learning in preschool education. Comput. Educ., 70:53--64, Jan 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. G. Gordon and C. Breazeal. Bayesian active learning-based robot tutor for children's word-reading skills. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI'15, pages 1343--1349. AAAI Press, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Gottlieb, P.-Y. Oudeyer, M. Lopes, and A. Baranes. Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: computational and neural mechanisms. Trends in cognitive sciences, 17(11):585--593, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. J. Habgood and S. E. Ainsworth. Motivating children to learn effectively: Exploring the value of intrinsic integration in educational games. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2):169--206, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Han, M. Jo, S. Park, and S. Kim. The educational use of home robots for children. In ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005., pages 378--383, Aug 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E. ja Hyun, S. yeon Kim, S. Jang, and S. Park. Comparative study of effects of language instruction program using intelligence robot and multimedia on linguistic ability of young children. In RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 187--192, Aug 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. T. K\"aser, S. Klingler, A. G. Schwing, and M. Gross. Beyond Knowledge Tracing: Modeling Skill Topologies with Bayesian Networks, pages 188--198. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Kennedy, P. Baxter, and T. Belpaeme. The robot who tried too hard: Social behaviour of a robot tutor can negatively affect child learning. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI '15, pages 67--74, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Kory and C. Breazeal. Storytelling with robots: Learning companions for preschool children's language development. In The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pages 643--648, Aug 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. Kory Westlund, G. Gordon, S. Spaulding, J. Lee, L. Plummer, M. Martinez, M. Das, and C. Breazeal. Learning a second language with a socially assistive robot. In The 1st International Conference on Social Robots in Therapy and Education, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. H. Kose-Bagci, E. Ferrari, K. Dautenhahn, D. S. Syrdal, and C. L. Nehaniv. Effects of embodiment and gestures on social interaction in drumming games with a humanoid robot. Advanced Robotics, 23(14):1951--1996, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. S. Leitner. So lernt man lernen: Der weg zum erfolg {learning to learn: The road to success}. Freiburg: Herder, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D. Leyzberg, S. Spaulding, M. Toneva, and B. Scassellati. The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. In CogSci. Citeseer, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Macedonia, K. Müller, and A. D. Friederici. Neural correlates of high performance in foreign language vocabulary learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 4(3):125--134, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. R. Movellan, M. Eckhardt, M. Virnes, and A. Rodriguez. Sociable robot improves toddler vocabulary skills. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pages 307--308, March 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. N. Rafferty, E. Brunskill, T. L. Griffiths, and P. Shafto. Faster teaching via pomdp planning. Cognitive Science, 2015. \balancecolumnsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. L. Rowe, R. D. Silverman, and B. E. Mullan. The role of pictures and gestures as nonverbal aids in preschoolers' word learning in a novel language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(2):109--117, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. M. Saerbeck, T. Schut, C. Bartneck, and M. D. Janse. Expressive robots in education: Varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '10, pages 1613--1622, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. G. Skantze and S. Al Moubayed. Iristk: A statechart-based toolkit for multi-party face-to-face interaction. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, ICMI '12, pages 69--76, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. Spaulding, G. Gordon, and C. Breazeal. Affect-aware student models for robot tutors. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, AAMAS '16, pages 864--872, Richland, SC, 2016. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Adaptive Robot Language Tutoring Based on Bayesian Knowledge Tracing and Predictive Decision-Making

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            HRI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
            March 2017
            510 pages
            ISBN:9781450343367
            DOI:10.1145/2909824

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 6 March 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader