skip to main content
10.1145/2910896.2910916acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Extracting Academic Genealogy Trees from the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations

Published:19 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Along the history, many researchers provided remarkable contributions to science, not only advancing knowledge but also in terms of mentoring new scientists. Currently, identifying and studying the formation of researchers over the years is a challenging task as current repositories of theses and dissertations are cataloged in a decentralized way through many local digital libraries. In this paper, we give a first step towards building a large repository that records the academic genealogy of researchers across fields and countries. We crawled data from the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD) and develop a framework to extract academic genealogy trees from this data and provide a series of analyses that describe the main properties of the academic genealogy trees. Our effort identified interesting findings related to the structure of academic formation, which highlight the importance of cataloging academic genealogy trees. We hope our initial framework will be the basis of a much larger crowdsourcing system.

References

  1. B. L. Alves, F. Benevenuto, and A. H. F. Laender. The Role of Research Leaders on the Evolution of Scientific Communities. In Proc. of WWW (Companion Volume), pages 649--656, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A.-L. Barabâsi, H. Jeong, Z. Néda, E. Ravasz, A. Schubert, and T. Vicsek. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3):590--614, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. F. Benevenuto, A. H. F. Laender, and B. L. Alves. The h-index paradox: your coauthors have a higher h-index than you do. Scientometrics, 106(1):469--474, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. W. A. Burchard and R. M. Keller. Some approaches to best-match file searching. CACM, 16(4):230--236, 1973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Calado, M. A. Gonçalves, E. A. Fox, B. A. Ribeiro-Neto, A. H. F. Laender, A. S. da Silva, D. de Castro Reis, P. A. Roberto, M. V. Vieira, and J. P. Lage. The Web-DL Environment for Building Digital Libraries from the Web. In Proc. of JCDL, pages 346--357, Houston, USA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Chang. Academic genealogy of american physicists. AAPPS Bulletin, 13(6):6--41, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. V. David and B. Y. Hayden. Neurotree: A collaborative, graphical database of the academic genealogy of neuroscience. PLoS ONE, 7(10):e46608, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. E. A. Fox, M. A. Gonçalves, G. McMillan, J. L. Eaton, A. Atkins, and N. A. Kipp. The networked digital library of theses and dissertations: Changes in the university community. J. Comp. in H. Educ., 13(2):102--124, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. W. Gl\"anzel. National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1):69--115, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. C. Griffiths. Counting genealogical trees. J. of Math. Biol., 25(4):423--431, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. E. Hirsch. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. PNAS, 102(46):16569--16572, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Jackson. A labor of love: the mathematics genealogy project. Notices of the AMS, 54(8):1002--1003, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. X. Liu, J. Bollen, M. L. Nelson, and H. Van de Sompel. Coauthorship networks in the digital library research community. IPM, 41(6):1462--1480, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. D. Malmgren, J. M. Ottino, and L. A. N. Amaral. The role of mentorship in protégé performance. Nature, 465(7298):622--626, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. G. V. Menezes, N. Ziviani, A. H. F. Laender, and V. A. F. Almeida. A Geographical Analysis of Knowledge Production in Computer Science. In Proc. of WWW, pages 1041--1050, Madrid, Spain, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. E. Newman. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. PNAS, 98(2):404--409, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. E. Newman. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. PNAS, 101(s. 1):5200--5205, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. L. Rossi and J. P. Mena-Chalco. Caracterizaçao de árvores de genealogia acadêmica por meio de métricas em grafos. Anais do XXXIV CSBC, pages 21--32, 2014 (in Portuguese).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. E. Tuesta, K. Delgado, R. Mugnaini, L. Digiampietri, J. Mena-Chalco, and J. Pérez-Alcázar. Analysis of an Advisor-Advisee Relationship: An Exploratory Study of the Area of Exact and Earth Sciences in Brazil. PloS One, 10(5):e0129065--e0129065, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Extracting Academic Genealogy Trees from the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      JCDL '16: Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
      June 2016
      316 pages
      ISBN:9781450342292
      DOI:10.1145/2910896

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 June 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      JCDL '16 Paper Acceptance Rate15of52submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader