skip to main content
10.1145/2911451.2914683acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A Dynamic Recurrent Model for Next Basket Recommendation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Next basket recommendation becomes an increasing concern. Most conventional models explore either sequential transaction features or general interests of users. Further, some works treat users' general interests and sequential behaviors as two totally divided matters, and then combine them in some way for next basket recommendation. Moreover, the state-of-the-art models are based on the assumption of Markov Chains (MC), which only capture local sequential features between two adjacent baskets. In this work, we propose a novel model, Dynamic REcurrent bAsket Model (DREAM), based on Recurrent Neural Network (RNN). DREAM not only learns a dynamic representation of a user but also captures global sequential features among baskets. The dynamic representation of a specific user can reveal user's dynamic interests at different time, and the global sequential features reflect interactions of all baskets of the user over time. Experiment results on two public datasets indicate that DREAM is more effective than the state-of-the-art models for next basket recommendation.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. TKDE, 17(6):734--749, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Chen, J. L. Moore, D. Turnbull, and T. Joachims. Playlist prediction via metric embedding. In SIGKDD, pages 714--722, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Gatzioura and M. Sanchez-Marre. A case-based recommendation approach for market basket data. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 30(1):20--27, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Computer, (8):30--37, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Mikolov, S. Kombrink, L. Burget, J. H. Černocky, and S. Khudanpur. Extensions of recurrent neural network language model. In ICASSP, pages 5528--5531, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Bpr: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In UAI, pages 452--461, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Factorizing personalized markov chains for next-basket recommendation. In WWW, pages 811--820, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Cognitive modeling, 5:3, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Wang, J. Guo, Y. Lan, J. Xu, S. Wan, and X. Cheng. Learning hierarchical representation model for nextbasket recommendation. In SIGIR, pages 403--412, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Zhang, H. Dai, C. Xu, J. Feng, T. Wang, J. Bian, B. Wang, and T.-Y. Liu. Sequential click prediction for sponsored search with recurrent neural networks. In AAAI, pages 1369--1376, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Dynamic Recurrent Model for Next Basket Recommendation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR '16: Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
      July 2016
      1296 pages
      ISBN:9781450340694
      DOI:10.1145/2911451

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 July 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR '16 Paper Acceptance Rate62of341submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader