skip to main content
10.1145/2974804.2974808acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Do Synchronized Multiple Robots Exert Peer Pressure?

Published:04 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In human-human interaction, peer pressure is a major social influence on people's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. The larger the group of people, the more social influence it exerts. In this paper, we investigate whether multiple robots and their synchronized behaviors exert peer pressure on people, as in human groups. We developed a multiple robot controller system that enables robots to perform precise synchronization. In the experiment, we prepared a setting that resembled previous experiments that investigated peer pressure between people and robots. The participants answered questions after hearing the robots' answers, only some of which were incorrect. Our experiment results showed that the influence of the synchronized multiple robots increased the error rates of the participants, but we found no significant effects toward conformity.

References

  1. M. Sherif, "A study of some social factors in perception," Archives of Psychology (Columbia University), 1935.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. E. Asch, "Opinions and social pressure," Readings about the social animal, vol. 193, pp. 17--26, 1955.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. E. Asch, "Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments," Groups, leadership, and men. S, pp. 222--236, 1951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. W. Spencer, and J. H. Huston, "Rational forecasts: On confirming ambiguity as the mother of conformity," Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 697--709, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. V. Griskevicius, N. J. Goldstein, C. R. Mortensen, R. B. Cialdini, and D. T. Kenrick, "Going along versus going alone: when fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non) conformity," Journal of personality and social psychology, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 281, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. C. Midden, J. Ham, and J. Baten, "Conforming to an Artificial Majority: Persuasive Effects of a Group of Artificial Agents," Persuasive Technology: 10th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2015, Chicago, IL, USA, June 3--5, 2015, Proceedings, T. MacTavish and S. Basapur, eds., pp. 229--240, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P. H. Kahn Jr, T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, N. G. Freier, R. L. Severson, B. T. Gill, J. H. Ruckert, and S. Shen, ""Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": Children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot," Developmental psychology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 303, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. Hayashi, M. Shiomi, T. Kanda, and N. Hagita, "Are Robots Appropriate for Troublesome and Communicative Tasks in a City Environment?," IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 150--160, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Shiomi, K. Nakagawa, K. Shinozawa, R. Matsumura, H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita, "Does A Robot's Touch Encourage Human Effort?," International Journal of Social Robotics, pp. 1--11, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K. Nakagawa, M. Shiomi, K. Shinozawa, R. Matsumura, H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita, "Effect of Robot's Whispering Behavior on People's Motivation," International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 5--16, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. B. Reeves, and C. Nass, How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places: CSLI Publications and Cambridge university press, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B. J. Fogg, "Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do," Ubiquity, vol. 2002, no. December, pp. 5, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Woods, K. Dautenhahn, and C. Kaouri, "Is someone watching me?-consideration of social facilitation effects in human-robot interaction experiments," in Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, 2005. CIRA 2005. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 53--60, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. N. Riether, F. Hegel, B. Wrede, and G. Horstmann, "Social facilitation with social robots'," in HumanRobot Interaction (HRI), 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pp. 41--47, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Shinozawa, F. Naya, J. Yamato, and K. Kogure, "Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 267--279, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. H.-M. Gross, H.-J. Böhme, C. Schröter, S. Mueller, A. König, C. Martin, M. Merten, and A. Bley, "Shopbot: Progress in developing an interactive mobile shopping assistant for everyday use," in Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2008. SMC 2008. IEEE International Conference on, pp. 3471--3478, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Shiomi, D. Sakamoto, T. Kanda, C. T. Ishi, H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita, "Field Trial of a Networked Robot at a Train Station," International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27--40, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. D. Sakamoto, K. Hayashi, T. Kanda, M. Shiomi, S. Koizumi, H. Ishiguro, T. Ogasawara, and N. Hagita, "Humanoid Robots as a Broadcasting Communication Medium in Open Public Spaces," International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 157--169, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. J. Kory, and C. Breazeal, "Storytelling with robots: Learning companions for preschool children's language development," in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2014 RO-MAN: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 643--648, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. I. Leite, M. McCoy, M. Lohani, D. Ullman, N. Salomons, C. K. Stokes, S. Rivers, and B. Scassellati, "Emotional Storytelling in the Classroom: Individual versus Group Interaction between Children and Robots," in HRI, pp. 75--82, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Brandstetter, P. Racz, C. Beckner, E. B. Sandoval, J. Hay, and C. Bartneck, "A peer pressure experiment: Recreation of the Asch conformity experiment with robots," in Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2014), 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pp. 1335--1340, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D. Forsyth, Group dynamics: Cengage Learning, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. H. Kawai, T. Toda, J. Ni, M. Tsuzaki, and K. Tokuda, "XIMERA: A new TTS from ATR based on corpusbased technologies," in Fifth ISCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, pp., 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. E. Asch, "Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. D. Y. Geiskkovitch, D. Cormier, S. H. Seo, and J. E. Young, "Please Continue, We Need More Data: An Exploration of Obedience to Robots," Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 82--99, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Do Synchronized Multiple Robots Exert Peer Pressure?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      HAI '16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction
      October 2016
      414 pages
      ISBN:9781450345088
      DOI:10.1145/2974804

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      HAI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate29of182submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate121of404submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader