skip to main content
10.1145/2974804.2974820acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conversational Agents and Mental Health: Theory-Informed Assessment of Language and Affect

Published:04 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

A study deployed the mental health Relational Frame Theory as grounding for an analysis of sentiment dynamics in human-language dialogs. The work takes a step towards enabling use of conversational agents in mental health settings. Sentiment tendencies and mirroring behaviors in 11k human-human dialogs were compared with behaviors when humans interacted with conversational agents in a similar-sized collection. The study finds that human sentiment-related interaction norms persist in human-agent dialogs, but that humans are twice as likely to respond negatively when faced with a negative utterance by a robot than in a comparable situation with humans. Similarly, inhibition towards use of obscenity is greatly reduced. We introduce a new Affective Neural Net implementation that specializes in analyzing sentiment in real time.

References

  1. Tim Althoff, Kevin Clark, and Jure Leskovec. 2016. Natural Language Processing for Mental Health: Large Scale Discourse Analysis of Counseling Conversations. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Timothy Bickmore, Amanda Gruber, and Rosalind Picard. 2005. Establishing the computer-patient working alliance in automated health behavior change interventions. Patient education and counseling 59, 1 (2005), 21--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Timothy W Bickmore, Daniel Schulman, and Candace Sidner. 2013. Automated interventions for multiple health behaviors using conversational agents. Patient education and counseling 92, 2 (2013), 142--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Junyoung Chung, Caglar Gulcehre, KyungHyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling. arxiv.org (12 2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3555Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Christopher Cieri and et al. 2004/2005. Fisher English Training Speech Part 1/2 Transcripts LDC2004T19. Linguistic Data Consortium. (2004/2005). https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2004T19Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Rik Crutzen, Gjalt-Jorn Y Peters, Sarah Dias Portugal, Erwin M Fisser, and Jorne J Grolleman. 2011. An artificially intelligent chat agent that answers adolescents' questions related to sex, drugs, and alcohol: an exploratory study. Journal of Adolescent Health 48, 5 (2011), 514--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Alison M Darcy, Alan K Louie, and Laura Weiss Roberts. 2016. Machine Learning and the Profession of Medicine. JAMA 315, 6 (2016), 551--552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Xiaowen Ding and Bing Liu. 2007. The Utility of Linguistic Rules in Opinion Mining. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 811--812. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. David Daniel Ebert, Anna-Carlotta Zarski, Helen Christensen, Yvonne Stikkelbroek, Pim Cuijpers, Matthias Berking, and Heleen Riper. 2015. Internet and computer-based cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression in youth: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled outcome trials. PloS one 10, 3 (2015), e0119895.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Paul Ekman. 1984. Expression and the nature of emotion. Approaches to emotion 3 (1984), 19--344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yarin Gal. 2015. A Theoretically Grounded Application of Dropout in Recurrent Neural Networks. arxiv.org (12 2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.05287Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Felix Greaves, Daniel Ramirez-Cano, Christopher Millett, Ara Darzi, and Liam Donaldson. 2013. Harnessing the cloud of patient experience: using social media to detect poor quality healthcare. BMJ quality & safety (2013), bmjqs'2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. David E Greenway, Emily K Sandoz, and David R Perkins. 2010. Potential applications of relational frame theory to natural language systems. In Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2010 Seventh International Conference on, Vol. 6. IEEE, 2955--2958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Steven C Hayes, Dermot Barnes-Holmes, and Bryan Roche. 2001. Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jing Huang, Qi Li, Yuanyuan Xue, Taoran Cheng, Shuangqing Xu, Jia Jia, and Ling Feng. 2015. Teenchat: a chatterbot system for sensing and releasing adolescents stress. In Health Information Science. Springer, 133--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Eva Hudlicka. 2003. To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction. International journal of human-computer studies 59, 1 (2003), 1--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C.J. Hutto and Eric Gilbert. 2014. VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. In Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI Publications, Ann Arbor, MI, 216--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kristin N Javaras, Nan M Laird, Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud, Cynthia M Bulik, Harrison G Pope, and James I Hudson. 2008. Familiality and heritability of binge eating disorder: results of a case-control family study and a twin study. International Journal of Eating Disorders 41, 2 (2008), 174--179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Nitin Jindal and Bing Liu. 2006. Identifying Comparative Sentences in Text Documents. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 244--251. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1148170.1148215 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. David Kessler, Glyn Lewis, Surinder Kaur, Nicola Wiles, Michael King, Scott Weich, Debbie J Sharp, Ricardo Araya, Sandra Hollinghurst, and Tim J Peters. 2009. Therapist-delivered internet psychotherapy for depression in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 374, 9690 (2009), 628--634.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Adam DI Kramer, Jamie E Guillory, and Jeffrey T Hancock. 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 24 (2014), 8788--8790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Yang Liu, Xiaohui Yu, Zhongshuai Chen, and Bing Liu. 2013. Sentiment Analysis of Sentences with Modalities. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Workshop on Mining Unstructured Big Data Using Natural Language Processing (UnstructureNLP '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39--44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2513549.2513556 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ramesh Manuvinakurike, Wayne F Velicer, and Timothy W Bickmore. 2014. Automated indexing of Internet stories for health behavior change: weight loss attitude pilot study. Journal of medical Internet research 16, 12 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Evan Mayo-Wilson and Paul Montgomery. 2013. Media-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy and behavioural therapy (self-help) for anxiety disorders in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9 (2013), CD005330.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, and K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.). Curran Associates, Inc., 3111--3119. http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4546 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Adam S Miner, Arnold Milstein, Stephen Schueller, Roshini Hegde, Christina Mangurian, and Eleni Linos. 2016. Smartphone-based conversational agents and responses to questions about mental health, interpersonal violence, and physical health. JAMA internal medicine (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. David C Mohr, Michelle Nicole Burns, Stephen M Schueller, Gregory Clarke, and Michael Klinkman. 2013. Behavioral intervention technologies: evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health. General hospital psychiatry 35, 4 (2013), 332--338.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Theresa B Moyers and William R Miller. 2013. Is low therapist empathy toxic? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 27, 3 (2013), 878.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. James W Pennebaker, Ryan L Boyd, Kayla Jordan, and Kate Blackburn. 2015. The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015. UT Faculty/Researcher Works (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. James W Pennebaker, Matthias R Mehl, and Kate G Niederhoffer. 2003. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual review of psychology 54, 1 (2003), 547--577.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Erik Rautalinko, Hans-Olof Lisper, and Bo Ekehammar. 2007. Reflective listening in counseling: effects of training time and evaluator social skills. American journal of psychotherapy 61, 2 (2007), 191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Byron Reeves and Cliff Nass. 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rainer Reisenzein, Eva Hudlicka, Mehdi Dastani, Jonathan Gratch, Koen Hindriks, Emiliano Lorini, and John-Jules Ch Meyer. 2013. Computational modeling of emotion: Toward improving the inter-and intradisciplinary exchange. Affective Computing, IEEE Transactions on 4, 3 (2013), 246--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Paul Tero, Ilia Zaitsev, and Rollo Carpenter. 2016. Cleverbot Data for Machine Learning. http://www.existor.com/en/ml-cleverbot-data-for-machine-learning.html. (January 2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Adam Waytz, John Cacioppo, and Nicholas Epley. 2010. Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5, 3 (2010), 219--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Conversational Agents and Mental Health: Theory-Informed Assessment of Language and Affect

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      HAI '16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction
      October 2016
      414 pages
      ISBN:9781450345088
      DOI:10.1145/2974804

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      HAI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate29of182submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate121of404submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader