Konstantin Kuznetsov
Andreas Zeller
ABSTRACT
Does the advertised behavior of apps correlate with what a user sees on a screen? In this paper, we introduce a technique to statically extract the text from the user interface definitions of an Android app. We use this technique to compare the natural language topics of an app’s user interface against the topics from its app store description. A mismatch indicates that some feature is exposed by the user interface, but is not present in the description, or vice versa. The popular Twitter app, for instance, spots UI elements that al- low to make purchases; however, this feature is not mentioned in its description. Likewise, we identified a number of apps whose user interface asks users to access or supply sensitive data; but this “feature” is not mentioned in the description. In the long run, analyzing user interface topics and comparing them against external descriptions opens the way for checking general mismatches between requirements and implementation.
- A. A. Al-Subaihin, F. Sarro, S. Black, L. Capra, M. Harman, Y. Jia, and Y. Zhang. Clustering mobile apps based on mined textual descriptions. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), ESEM ’16, 2016. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- V. Avdiienko, K. Kuznetsov, P. Calciati, J. C. C. Román, A. Gorla, and A. Zeller. CALAPPA: a toolchain for mining android applications. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on App Market Analytics, WAMA 2016, pages –. ACM, 11 2016. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Gorla, I. Tavecchia, F. Gross, and A. Zeller. Checking app behavior against app descriptions. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2014, pages 1025–1035, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Huang, X. Zhang, L. Tan, P. Wang, and B. Liang. AsDroid: detecting stealthy behaviors in Android applications by user interface and program behavior contradiction. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2014, pages 1036–1046, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Kuznetsov, A. Gorla, I. Tavecchia, F. Gross, and A. Zeller. Mining android apps for anomalies. In The Art and Science of Analyzing Software Data, pages 257–281. Morgan Kaufmann, 4 2015.Google Scholar
- R. T.-W. Lo, B. He, and I. Ounis. Automatically building a stopword list for an information retrieval system. In Information Retrieval Workshop, page 17. Citeseer, 2005.Google Scholar
- A. K. McCallum. Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu, 2002.Google Scholar
- S. Nakatani. Language detection library for Java, 2010.Google Scholar
- R. Pandita, X. Xiao, W. Yang, W. Enck, and T. Xie. WHYPER: Towards automating risk assessment of mobile applications. In USENIX Security Symposium, pages 527–542, 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z. Qu, V. Rastogi, X. Zhang, Y. Chen, T. Zhu, and Z. Chen. AutoCog: Measuring the description-to-permission fidelity in Android applications. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Yu, X. Luo, C. Qian, and S. Wang. Revisiting the description-to-behavior fidelity in android applications. In 2016 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), volume 1, pages 415–426, March 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Checking app user interfaces against app descriptions
Recommendations
An Explorative Study of the Mobile App Ecosystem from App Developers' Perspective
WWW '17: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide WebWith the prevalence of smartphones, app markets such as Apple App Store and Google Play has become the center stage in the mobile app ecosystem, with millions of apps developed by tens of thousands of app developers in each major market. This paper ...
Same app, different app stores: a comparative study
MOBILESoft '17: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and SystemsTo attract more users, implementing the same mobile app for different platforms has become a common industry practice. App stores provide a unique channel for users to share feedback on the acquired apps through ratings and textual reviews. However, ...
Inter-app communication between Android apps developed in app-inventor and Android studio
MOBILESoft '16: Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and SystemsCommunications between mobile apps are an important aspect of mobile platforms. Android is specifically designed with inter-app communication in mind and depends on this to provide different platform specific functionalities. Android Apps can either be ...
Comments