skip to main content
10.1145/3017680.3017749acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"Creating Cool Stuff": Pupils' Experience of the BBC micro:bit

Published:08 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The recent introduction of computer science (CS) education into schools in many countries has led to a surge in interest in programming tools and approaches which make CS concepts and tasks engaging, motivating and accessible to all. There is renewed interest in supporting learning through physical computing, which has been shown to be motivational whilst offering opportunities for collaboration and creativity. Within this context the BBC recently led a collaborative venture in the UK to develop a portable and low-cost programmable device. The consortium funded and produced one million devices, enough for every 11-12 year-old in the UK. In this paper, we report on what we believe to be the first study to investigate the usability and affordances of the BBC micro:bit. We interviewed 15 teachers and 54 pupils in schools in England about their experiences with the device who were, in general, enthusiastic about the potential of the BBC micro:bit. We describe pupils' experiences in terms of usability, creativity, the tangibility of the device and their learning of programming, and analyse their experiences in the context of previously reported benefits of physical computing.

References

  1. BBC to give away 1m Micro:bit computers to schoolchildrentextbar Technologytextbar The Guardian.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. Ball, J. Protzenko, J. Bishop, M. Moskal, J. de Halleux, M. Braun, S. Hodges, and C. Riley. Microsoft touch develop and the bbc micro:bit. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, ICSE '16, pages 637--640, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Banzi. Getting Started with Arduino. O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, CA, 2. ed edition, 2011. OCLC: 844925524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Barba and S. Chancellor. Tangible Media Approaches to Introductory Computer Science. pages 207--212. ACM Press, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Ben-Ari. Constructivism in computer science education. pages 257--261, 274308, 1998. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Brown, S. Sentance, T. Crick, and S. Humphreys. Restart: The Resurgence of Computer Science in UK Schools. ACM Transactions of Computing Education, 14(2), June 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. H. Clements. 'Concrete' manipulatives, concrete ideas. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 1(1):45--60, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. K. DesPortes, M. Spells, and B. DiSalvo. The MoveLab: Developing Congruence Between Students' Self-Concepts and Computing. pages 267--272. ACM Press, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Hodges, J. Scott, S. Sentance, C. Miller, N. Villar, S. Schwiderski-Grosche, K. Hammil, and S. Johnston. .NET Gadgeteer: a new platform for K-12 computer science education. In Proceedings of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, pages 391--396. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. S. Horn, R. J. Crouser, and M. U. Bers. Tangible interaction and learning: the case for a hybrid approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(4):379--389, Apr. 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. U. Kuckartz. Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice and using software. Sage, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. Marshall. Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? page 163. ACM Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Mayring. Qualitative content analysis. Forum of Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Jun 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Papert and I. Harel. Situating constructionism. Constructionism, 36:1--11, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Przybylla and R. Romeike. Key Competences with Physical Computing. KEYCIT 2014: key competencies in informatics and ICT, 7:351, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Sentance and S. Schwiderski-Grosche. Challenge and creativity: using .NET gadgeteer in schools. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, pages 90--100. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G. S. Stager. Papert's prison fab lab: implications for the maker movement and education design. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, pages 487--490. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. E. Stiller. Teaching programming using bricolage. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 24(6):35--42, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. The Royal Society. Shut Down or Restart? The way forward for Computing in UK Schools. Technical report, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. "Creating Cool Stuff": Pupils' Experience of the BBC micro:bit

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
        March 2017
        838 pages
        ISBN:9781450346986
        DOI:10.1145/3017680

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 March 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGCSE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate105of348submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader