skip to main content
research-article

A Double-Layer Neural Network Framework for High-Frequency Forecasting

Published:12 January 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Nowadays, machine trading contributes significantly to activities in the equity market, and forecasting market movement under high-frequency scenario has become an important topic in finance. A key challenge in high-frequency market forecasting is modeling the dependency structure among stocks and business sectors, with their high dimensionality and the requirement of computational efficiency. As a group of powerful models, neural networks (NNs) have been used to capture the complex structure in many studies. However, most existing applications of NNs only focus on forecasting with daily or monthly data, not with minute-level data that usually contains more noises. In this article, we propose a novel double-layer neural (DNN) network for high-frequency forecasting, with links specially designed to capture dependence structures among stock returns within different business sectors. Various important technical indicators are also included at different layers of the DNN framework. Our model framework allows update over time to achieve the best goodness-of-fit with the most recent data. The model performance is tested based on 100 stocks with the largest capitals from the S8P 500. The results show that the proposed framework outperforms benchmark methods in terms of the prediction accuracy and returns. Our method will help in financial analysis and trading strategy designs.

References

  1. Torben G. Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, and Francis X. Diebold. 2007. Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility. Rev. Econom. Stat. 89, 4, 701--720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Torben G. Andersen, Tim Bollerslev, Francis X. Diebold, and Heiko Ebens. 2001. The distribution of realized stock return volatility. J. Finan. Econ. 61, 1, 43--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Andrés Arévalo, Jaime Niño, German Hernández, and Javier Sandoval. 2016. High-frequency trading strategy based on deep neural networks. In Intelligent Computing Methodologies. Springer International Publishing, 424--436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Senthil Arasu Balasubramanian, Jeevananthan Manickavasagam, Thamaraiselvan Natarajan, and Janarthanan Balakrishnan. 2015. An experimental analysis of forecasting the high frequency data of matured and emerging economies stock index using data mining techniques. Int. J. Operat. Res. 23, 4, 406--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. W. Brown and M. T. Cliff. 2004. Investor sentiment and the near-term stock market. J. Empir. Finance. 11, 1, 1--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Pei-Chann Chang, Di-di Wang, and Chang-le Zhou. 2012. A novel model by evolving partially connected neural network for stock price trend forecasting. Expert Syst. Applic. 39, 1, 611--620. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gong-meng Chen, Michael Firth, and Oliver M. Rui. 2001. The dynamic relation between stock returns, trading volume, and volatility. Finan. Rev. 36, 3, 153--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Tai-Liang Chen, Ching-Hsue Cheng, and Hia Jong Teoh. 2007. Fuzzy time-series based on Fibonacci sequence for stock price forecasting. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Applic. 380, 377--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Thomas C. Chiang, Hai-Chin Yu, and Ming-Chya Wu. 2009. Statistical properties, dynamic conditional correlation, scaling analysis of high-frequency intraday stock returns: Evidence from dow-jones and nasdaq indices. Phys. A. 388, 8, 1555--1570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Taufiq Choudhry, Frank McGroarty, Ke Peng, and Shiyun Wang. 2012. High-frequency exchange-rate prediction with an artificial neural network. Intell. Syst. Account., Finan. Manage. 19, 3, 170--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wensheng Dai, Jui-Yu Wu, and Chi-Jie Lu. 2012. Combining nonlinear independent component analysis and neural network for the prediction of Asian stock market indexes. Expert Syst. Applic. 39, 4, 4444--4452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Philip Hans Franses and Dick Van Dijk. 1996. Forecasting stock market volatility using (nonlinear) GARCH models. J. Forecast. 229--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. Ghiassi, J. Skinner, and D. Zimbra. 2013. Twitter brand sentiment analysis: A hybrid system using n-gram analysis and dynamic artificial neural network. Expert Syst. Applic.: An Int. J. 40, 16, 6266--6282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rosella Giacometti, Marida Bertocchi, Svetlozar T. Rachev, and Frank J. Fabozzi. 2012. A comparison of the Lee-Carter model and AR-ARCH model for forecasting mortality rates. Insurance: Math. Econom. 50, 1, 85--93 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. D. Rafiul Hassan, Baikunth Nath, and Michael Kirley. 2007. A fusion model of HMM, ANN and GA for stock market forecasting. Expert Syst. Applic. 33, 1, 171--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. C. C. Holt. 2004. Author's retrospective on ‘forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages. Int. J. Forecast. 20, 1, 11--13. DOI:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2003.09.017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Sheng-Hsun Hsu, J. J. Po-An Hsieh, Ting-Chih Chih, and Kuei-Chu Hsu. 2009. A two-stage architecture for stock price forecasting by integrating self-organizing map and support vector regression. Expert Syst. Applic. 36, 4, 7947--7951. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Roger D. Huang and Hans R. Stoll. 1994. Market microstructure and stock return predictions. Rev. Finan Stud. 7, 1, 179--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Yakup Kara, Melek Acar Boyacioglu, and Ömer Kaan Baykan. 2011. Predicting direction of stock price index movement using artificial neural networks and support vector machines: The sample of the istanbul stock exchange. Expert Syst. Applic. 38, 5, 5311--5319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jonathan M. Karpoff. 1987. The relation between price changes and trading volume: A survey. J. Finan. and Quantitat. Anal. 22, 01, 109--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Bryan Kelly and Seth Pruitt. 2015. The three-pass regression filter: A new approach to forecasting using many predictors. J. Econometrics. 186, 2, 294--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Christopher G. Lamoureux and William D. Lastrapes. 1990. Heteroskedasticity in stock return data: volume versus GARCH effects. J. Finance 45, 1, 221--229. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Fajiang Liu and Jun Wang. 2012. Fluctuation prediction of stock market index by Legendre neural network with random time strength function. Neurocomputing 83, 12--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ping-Feng Pai and Chih-Sheng Lin. 2005. A hybrid ARIMA and support vector machines model in stock price forecasting. Omega 33, 6. 497--505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jigar Patel, Sahil Shah, Priyank Thakkar, and K. Kotecha. 2015. Predicting stock and stock price index movement using trend deterministic data preparation and machine learning techniques. Expert Syst. Applicat. 42, 1, 259--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Alexis Akira Toda. 2012. The double power law in income distribution: Explanations and evidence. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84, 1, 364--381. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Alexis Akira Toda and Kieran James Walsh. 2014. The double power law in consumption and implications for testing euler equations. Available at SSRN 2319454.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Chih-Fong Tsai and Yu-Chieh Hsiao. 2010. Combining multiple feature selection methods for stock prediction: Union, intersection, and multi-intersection approaches. Decis. Supp. Syst. 50, 1, 258--269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Johannes Voit. 2013. The Statistical Mechanics of Financial Markets: Springer Science 8 Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin L. Weitzman. 2007. Subjective expectations and asset-return puzzles. Amer. Econom. Rev.:1102--1130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. J. Zakon and J. C. Pennypacker. 1968. An analysis of the advance-decline line as a stock market indicator. J. Finan. Quant. Anals. 3, 3, 299--314 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Double-Layer Neural Network Framework for High-Frequency Forecasting

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
        ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 7, Issue 4
        January 2017
        74 pages
        ISSN:2158-656X
        EISSN:2158-6578
        DOI:10.1145/3026477
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 January 2017
        • Accepted: 1 November 2016
        • Revised: 1 August 2016
        • Received: 1 March 2016
        Published in tmis Volume 7, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader