skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025641acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Gestures From the Point of View of an Audience: Towards Anticipatable Interaction of Presenters With 3D Content.

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Presenting content to an audience is important in several fields, including education, marketing, and entertainment. Therefore, the main goal of the presenter is to transport messages to the audience.

The paper aims to improve the process of message transportation by providing audience-friendly and anticipatable gestures for the presenter to be used for 3D interaction with the content. For this purpose, we first gathered input from a potential audience through a Wizard of Oz experiment and implemented three coherent gesture sets using the Kinect. We conducted an online survey to evaluate the hypotheses regarding the anticipation rate and perceived user experience. In particular, two of our three gesture sets show tendencies to be intuitively predictable by an untrained, uninformed audience. As the three sets differ significantly in the anticipation level, we conclude that future improvements of such gestures would enhance the audience's ability to predict the intended actions even further.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. DesignDoll. http://terawell.net/. Accessed: 2016--21--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, T. C., Ahmed, H. S., and Anagnostopoulos, G. C. An Open Source Framework for Real-Time, Incremental, Static and Dynamic Hand Gesture Learning and Recognition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, 123--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Althoff, F., McGlaun, G., Lang, M., and Rigoll, G. Evaluating Multimodal Interaction Patterns in Various Application Scenarios. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004, 421--435.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Batrinca, L., Stratou, G., Shapiro, A., Morency, L.-P., and Scherer, S. Cicero - Towards a Multimodal Virtual Audience Platform for Public Speaking Training. In International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Humans, Lecture Notes on Computer Science (Edinburgh, UK, Aug. 2013), 116--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Carter, M., Newn, J., Velloso, E., and Vetere, F. Remote gaze and gesture tracking on the microsoft kinect: Investigating the role of feedback. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction, OzCHI '15, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 167--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cuccurullo, S., Francese, R., Murad, S., Passero, I., and Tucci, M. A gestural approach to presentation exploiting motion capture metaphors. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 148--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Curtis, K., Jones, G. J. F., and Campbell, N. Speaker impact on audience comprehension for academic presentations. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, ICMI 2016, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 129--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., and Ahrenberg, L. Wizard of oz studies: Why and how. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '93, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 1993), 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Figueiredo, L. S., Gonçalves Maciel Pinheiro, M. G., Vilar Neto, E. X., and Teichrieb, V. An open catalog of hand gestures from sci- movies. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '15, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 1319--1324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fikkert, W., van der Vet, P., van der Veer, G., and Nijholt, A. Gestures for Large Display Control. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010, 245--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gallo, L., Placitelli, A. P., and Ciampi, M. Controller-free exploration of medical image data: Experiencing the kinect. In Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 2011 24th International Symposium on (June 2011), 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Grandhi, S. A., Joue, G., and Mittelberg, I. Understanding naturalness and intuitiveness in gesture production: Insights for touchless gestural interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '11, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 821--824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Grijincu, D., Nacenta, M. A., and Kristensson, P. O. User-defined interface gestures: Dataset and analysis. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 25--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Haider, F., Cerrato, L., Campbell, N., and Luz, S. Presentation quality assessment using acoustic information and hand movements. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (March 2016), 2812--2816.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hartley, R., Elsayed, A., and Pesheva, M. Communication and design in multimodal presentations. In Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007) (July 2007), 923--924.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hespanhol, L., Tomitsch, M., Grace, K., Collins, A., and Kay, J. Investigating intuitiveness and effectiveness of gestures for free spatial interaction with large displays. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, PerDis '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 6:1--6:6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hinderks, A., Schrepp, M., Rauschenberger, M., and Thomaschewski, J. Konstruktion eines Fragebogens fr jugendliche Personen zur Messung der User Experience. Usability Professionals 2012, September 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Holman, D., Stojadinović, P., Karrer, T., and Borchers, J. Fly: An organic presentation tool. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '06, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2006), 863--868. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hsieh, W., Chen, C., Wang, S., Chen, Y., Hwang, Y., and Lai, J. Combination of the kinect with virtual reality in balance training for the elderly. Engineering, 5 (2013), 171--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Iason Oikonomidis, N. K., and Argyros, A. Efficient model-based 3d tracking of hand articulations using kinect. In Proc. BMVC (2011), 101.1--101.11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Laugwitz, B., Held, T., and Schrepp, M. Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008, 63--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Maulsby, D., Greenberg, S., and Mander, R. Prototyping an intelligent agent through wizard of oz. In Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '93, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 1993), 277--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Microsoft. Kinect hardware. https://dev.windows.com/en-us/kinect/hardware, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Microsoft. Kinect v2 plugin for unity. https://www.google.com/url'sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc= s&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved= 0ahUKEwiDjcft6szNAhXCtRQKHZobBlcQFggcMAA&url= http%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F% 3FLinkID%3D513177&usg= AFQjCNGZ4Z6Jle9X99V18nodlsmaYQTQOQ&sig2= J6RXEWs-J0bfY9bM-t5tSw&bvm=bv.125801520,d.d24& cad=rja, 22.10.2014. Accessed: 2016--21--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Nebeling, M., Huber, A., Ott, D., and Norrie, M. C. Web on the wall reloaded: Implementation, replication and refinement of user-defined interaction sets. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ITS '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 15--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nielsen, M., Strring, M., Moeslund, T. B., and Granum, E. A procedure for developing intuitive and ergonomic gesture interfaces for man-machine interaction (2003). 409--420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ren, Z., Meng, J., Yuan, J., and Zhang, Z. Robust hand gesture recognition with kinect sensor. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM '11, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2011), 759--760. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Roth, S., and Schulz, C. A pattern-based approach to presentations using slide facilities. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Program, EuroPLoP '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 15:1--15:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Rovelo Ruiz, G. A., Vanacken, D., Luyten, K., Abad, F., and Camahort, E. Multi-viewer gesture-based interaction for omni-directional video. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 4077--4086. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Salber, D., and Coutaz, J. Human-Computer Interaction: Third International Conference, EWHCI '93 Moscow, Russia, August 3--7, 1993 Selected Papers. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993, ch. Applying the Wizard of Oz technique to the study of multimodal systems, 219--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Shedroff, N., and Noessel, C. Make it so: Learning from sci-fi interfaces. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 7--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Soh, J., Choi, Y., Park, Y., and Yang, H. S. User-friendly 3d object manipulation gesture using kinect. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry, VRCAI '13, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2013), 231--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Song, P., Goh, W. B., Hutama, W., Fu, C.-W., and Liu, X. A handle bar metaphor for virtual object manipulation with mid-air interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '12, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2012), 1297--1306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Tan, K.-H., Gelb, D., Samadani, R., Robinson, I., Culbertson, B., and Apostolopoulos, J. Gaze awareness and interaction support in presentations. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM '10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 643--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tang, T. Y., Winoto, P., and Wang, R. Y. Having fun over a distance: Supporting multiplayer online ball passing using multiple sets of kinect. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '15, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 1187--1192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Tani, B. S., Maia, R. S., and Wangenheim, A. v. A gesture interface for radiological workstations. In Proceedings of the Twentieth IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, CBMS '07, IEEE Computer Society (Washington, DC, USA, 2007), 27--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Trinh, H., Yatani, K., and Edge, D. Pitchperfect: Integrated rehearsal environment for structured presentation preparation. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '14, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2014), 1571--1580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Unity. The leading global game industry software. https://unity3d.com/public-relations, 08.06.2016. Accessed: 2016--21--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Xiang Cao, Eyal Ofek, D. V. Evaluation of alternative presentation control techniques. In ACM SIG CHI 2005, ACM (January 2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Yang, Y., and Li, L. Turn a nintendo wiimote into a handheld computer mouse. IEEE Potentials Volume: 30, Issue: 1 (2011), 12--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Zobl, M., Geiger, M., Bengler, K., and Lang, M. A usability study on hand gesture controlled operation of in-car devices. In Poster Proceedings HCII 2001 (New (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Zobl, M., Nieschulz, R., Geiger, M., Lang, M., and Rigoll, G. Gesture Components for Natural Interaction with In-Car Devices. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004, 448--459.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Gestures From the Point of View of an Audience: Towards Anticipatable Interaction of Presenters With 3D Content.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader