skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3026028acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of Sharing Physiological States of Players in a Collaborative Virtual Reality Gameplay

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interfaces for collaborative tasks, such as multiplayer games can enable more effective and enjoyable collaboration. However, in these systems, the emotional states of the users are often not communicated properly due to their remoteness from one another. In this paper, we investigate the effects of showing emotional states of one collaborator to the other during an immersive Virtual Reality (VR) gameplay experience. We created two collaborative immersive VR games that display the real-time heart-rate of one player to the other. The two different games elicited different emotions, one joyous and the other scary. We tested the effects of visualizing heart-rate feedback in comparison with conditions where such a feedback was absent. The games had significant main effects on the overall emotional experience.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn4712-file3.mp4

mp4

16.1 MB

pn4712p.mp4

mp4

7.1 MB

p4045-dey.mp4

mp4

219.1 MB

References

  1. A. Aron, Aron E. N., and D. Smollan. 1992. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 4 (1992), 596--612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. A. Calvo and S. D'Mello. 2010. Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 1, 1 (Jan 2010), 18--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. De la Pena, P. Weil, E. Llobera, J. ad Giannopoulos, A. PomÖs, B. Spanlang, and M. Slater. 2010. Immersive journalism: immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19, 4 (2010), 291--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jang DP, Kim IY, Nam SW, Wiederhold BK, and Wiederhold MD abd Kim SI. 2002. Analysis of physiological response to two virtual environments: driving and flying simulation. Cyberpsychol Behav. 5, 1 (2002), 11 -- 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Wood DP, Murphy JA, Center KB, Russ C, McLay RN, Reeves D, Pyne J, Shilling R, Hagan J, and Wiederhold BK. 2008. Combat related post traumatic stress disorder: a multiple case report using virtual reality graded exposure therapy with physiological monitoring. Studies in health technology and informatics 132 (2008), 556 -- 561.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marc Fabri, David Moore, and Dave Hobbs. 2004. Mediating the expression of emotion in educational collaborative virtual environments: an experimental study. Virtual Reality 7, 2 (2004), 66--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Marc Fabri, David J. Moore, and Dave J. Hobbs. 1999. The Emotional Avatar: Non-verbal Communication Between Inhabitants of Collaborative Virtual Environments. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 269--273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Anna Felnhofer, Oswald D. Kothgassner, Mareike Schmidt, Anna-Katharina Heinzle, Leon Beutl, Helmut Hlavacs, and Ilse Kryspin-Exner. 2015. Is Virtual Reality Emotionally Arousing? Investigating Five Emotion Inducing Virtual Park Scenarios. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 82, C (Oct. 2015), 48--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. O. Gillath, C. A. McCall, P. Shaver, and J Blascovich. 2008. Reactions to a needy virtual person: Using an immersive virtual environment to measure prosocial tendencies. Media Psychology 11 (2008), 259--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Tim Howe and Paul M. Sharkey. 1998. Identifying Likely Successful Users of Virtual Reality Systems. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environment 7, 3 (1998), 308--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. HTC. 2016. Vive. http://www.vive.com/anz/. (2016). Accessed: 2016-09--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Empatica Inc. 2016. E4 Wristband. https://www.empatica.com/e4-wristband. (2016). Accessed: 2016-09--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Michael Meehan, Brent Insko, Mary Whitton, and Frederick P. Brooks, Jr. 2002. Physiological Measures of Presence in Stressful Virtual Environments. ACM Trans. Graph. 21, 3 (July 2002), 645--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Chris Milk. 2015. How Virtual Reality Can Create the Ultimate Empathy Machine. http://www.ted.com/talks/chris_milk_how_virtual_ reality_can_create_the_ultimate_empathy_machine. (2015). Accessed: 2016-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Leslie Moller and C Soles. 2001. Myers Briggs type preferences in distance learning education. International Journal of Educational Technology 2, 2 (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ewald Moser, Birgit Derntl, Simon Robinson, Bernhard Fink, Ruben C. Gur, and Karl Grammer. 2007. Amygdala activation at 3T in response to human and avatar facial expressions of emotions. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 161, 1 (2007), 126 -- 133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Oculus. 2016. Rift. https://www3.oculus.com/en-us/rift/. (2016). Accessed: 2016-09--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Daniela Palomba, Alessandro Angrilli, and Alessio Mini. 1997. Visual evoked potentials, heart rate responses and memory to emotional pictorial stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology 27, 1 (1997), 55 -- 67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. H. Prendinger and M. Ishizuka. 2005. The empathic companion: A character-based interface that addresses users' affective states. Applied Artificial Intelligence 19, 3--4 (2005), 267--285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. I. Ravenscroft. 1998. What is it like to be someone else? Simulation and empathy. Ratio 11, 2 (1998), 170--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. G. Riva, F. Mantovani, C.S. Capideville, A. Preziosa, F. Morganti, D. Villani, A. Gaggioli, C. Botella, and M. Alcaniz. 2007. Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10, 1 (2007), 45--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Albert Rizzo, Jacquelyn Morie, Josh Williams, Jarrell Pair, and John Galen Buckwalter. 2005. Human Emotional State and its Relevance for Military VR Training. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Las Vegas, NV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Michael J. Roy, Michelle E. Costanzo, Tanja Jovanovic, Suzanne Leaman, Patricia Taylor, Seth D. Norrholm, and Albert A. Rizzo. 2013. Heart Rate Response to Fear Conditioning and Virtual Reality in Subthreshold PTSD. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine 191 (2013), 115--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer. 1962. Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 69, 5 (Sep 1962), 379--399. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Sensaura. 2016. . http://www.sensauratech.com/. (2016). Accessed: 2016-09--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pulse Sensor. 2016. Heartbeat Sensor. http://pulsesensor.com/. (2016). Accessed: 2016-09--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. R. P. Smith, J. Argod, J. L. Pepin, and P. A. Levy. 1999. Pulse transit time: an appraisal of potential clinical applications. Thorax 54, 5 (May 1999), 452--457. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Chiew Seng Sean Tan, Kris Luyten, Jan Van Den Bergh, Johannes Schöning, and Karin Coninx. 2014a. The Role of Physiological Cues During Remote Collaboration. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 23, 1 (Feb. 2014), 90--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Chiew Seng Sean Tan, Johannes Schöning, Kris Luyten, and Karin Coninx. 2014b. Investigating the Effects of Using Biofeedback As Visual Stress Indicator During Video-mediated Collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 71--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. C. Thomas. 1996. The long-term social implications of new information technology. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 258 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. David Watson, Lee A. Clark, and Auke Tellegen. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 6 (1988), 1063--1070. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Brenda K. Wiederhold, Dong P. Jang, Mayumi Kaneda, Irene Cabral, Yair Lurie, Todd May, In Y. Kim, Mark D. Wiederhold, and Sun I. Kim. 2001. An Investigation into Physiological Responses in Virtual Environments: An Objective Measurement of Presence. Towards CyberPsychology: Mind, Cognitions and Society in the Internet Age. IOS, Amsterdam. 175--183 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Brenda K. Wiederhold, Dong P. Jang, Sun I. Kim, and Mark D. Wiederhold. 2002. Physiological Monitoring as an Objective Tool in Virtual Reality Therapy. CyberPsychology & Behavior 5, 1 (2002), 77 -- 82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Brenda K. Wiederhold and James L. Spira Richard N. Gevirtz. 2001. Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy vs. Imagery Desensitization Therapy in the Treatment of Flying Phobia. Towards CyberPsychology: Mind, Cognitions and Society in the Internet Age. IOS, Amsterdam. 253--270 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. C. J. A. M. Willemse, D. K. J. Heylen, and J. B. F. van Erp. 2015. Warmth in affective mediated interaction: Exploring the effects of physical warmth on interpersonal warmth. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 2015 International Conference on. 28--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Effects of Sharing Physiological States of Players in a Collaborative Virtual Reality Gameplay

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2017
      7138 pages
      ISBN:9781450346559
      DOI:10.1145/3025453

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader