skip to main content
10.1145/3047273.3047301acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Adoption and Diffusion of e-Government Services: the Impact of Demography and Service Quality

Published:07 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study attempts to analyze the impact of demography and service quality on the adoption and diffusion of e-government services in the context of India. The objective of this paper is to study the users' perception about e-Government services and investigate the key variables that are most salient to the Indian populace. The outcome of the study could be used by government agencies in designing, updating, and promoting e-government services to enhance public participation leading to better efficiency, convenience, engagement, and transparency. At the completion of this study, a research model that would help understand the relationship involving the demographic variables and service quality dimensions, and the willingness to adopt e-government services in India is expected to be developed.

References

  1. Ebrahim, Z., and Irani, Z. 2005. E-government adoption: architecture and barriers. Business process management journal, 11(5), 589--611.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Saxena, K. B. C. 2005. Towards excellence in e-governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(6), 498--513.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., and Rose, G. M. 2002. Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic markets, 12(3), 157--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., and Grimes, J. M. 2010. Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government information quarterly, 27(3), 264--271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhao, F., José Scavarda, A., and Waxin, M. F. 2012. Key issues and challenges in e-government development: An integrative case study of the number one eCity in the Arab world. Information Technology and People, 25(4), 395--422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Reddick, C. G. 2010. Comparative E-government (Vol. 25). Springer Science and Business Media. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kaur, R. 2016. E-governance: problems, challenges and prospects in India.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Verdegem, P., and Verleye, G. 2009. User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government information quarterly, 26(3), 487--497.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Al-Sobhi, F., Weerakkody, V., and El-Haddadeh, R. 2011. The relative importance of intermediaries in e-Government adoption: a study of Saudi Arabia. In International Conference on Electronic Government (pp. 62--74). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Weerakkody, V. 2010. Applied Technology Integration in Governmental Organizations: New E-Government Research: New E-Government Research. IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sahu, G. P. 2009. E-Government Development and Diffusion: Inhibitors and Facilitators of Digital Democracy: Inhibitors and Facilitators of Digital Democracy. IGI Global. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bwalya, K. J. 2012. Handbook of Research on E-Government in Emerging Economies: Adoption, E-Participation, and Legal Frameworks: Adoption, E-Participation, and Legal Frameworks. IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kettinger, W. J., and Lee, C. C. 1999. Replication of measures in information systems research: the case of IS SERVQUAL. Decision Sciences, 30(3), 893--899.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Liu, C., and Arnett, K. P. 2000. Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information and management, 38(1), 23--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Barnes, S., and Vidgen, R. 2000. WebQual: an exploration of website quality. ECIS 2000 Proceedings, 74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Barnes, S. J., and Vidgen, R. T. 2006. Data triangulation and web quality metrics: A case study in e-government. Information and Management, 43(6), 767--777. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Santos, J. 2003. E-service quality: a model of virtual service quality dimensions. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 13(3), 233--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., and Malhotra, A. 2002. Service quality delivery through web sites: a critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 30(4), 362--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Swartz, N. 2003. British slow to use e-government services. (Up front: news, trends and analysis). Information Management Journal, 37(2), 7--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Al Athmay, A. A. A. R. A. 2015. Demographic factors as determinants of e-governance adoption: A field study in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 9(2), 159--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Teo, T. S. 2001. Demographic and motivation variables associated with Internet usage activities. Internet Research, 11(2), 125--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T. A., and Venkatraman, S. 2014. Understanding e-Government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics. Information Systems Journal, 24(3), 249--269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Al-Somali, S. A., Gholami, R., and Clegg, B. 2009. An investigation into the acceptance of online banking in Saudi Arabia. Technovation, 29(2), 130--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., and Liu, X. 2015. A cross-cultural examination of the impact of social, organizational and individual factors on educational technology acceptance between British and Lebanese university students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 739--755.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Chan, F. T., and Chong, A. Y. L. 2013. Determinants of mobile supply chain management system: A structural equation analysis of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 51(4), 1196--1213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Neves, B. B., and Amaro, F. 2012. Too old for technology? How the elderly of Lisbon use and perceive ICT. The Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rhee, K. Y., and Kim, W. B. 2004. The adoption and use of the Internet in South Korea. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Brown, S. A., and Venkatesh, V. 2005. Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS quarterly, 399--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Choudrie, J., Ghinea, G., and Songonuga, V. N. 2013. Silver surfers, e-government and the digital divide: An exploratory study of UK local authority websites and older citizens. Interacting with Computers, IWS020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Alsmadi, I., and Abu-Shanab, E. 2016. E-government website security concerns and citizens' adoption. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 12(3), 243--255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Griffiths, J. R., and Brophy, P. 2005. Student searching behavior and the web: Use of academic resources and Google.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Carter, L., and Bélanger, F. 2005. The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Hughes, D., Crowley, C., Daniels, W., Bachiller, R., and Joosen, W. 2014. User-rank: generic query optimization for participatory social applications. 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1874--1883). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Phiri, M. A., and Mcwabe, T. 2013. Customers' expectations and perceptions of service quality: the case of pick n pay supermarket stores in Pietermaritzburg area, south africa. International Journal, 3(1), 2307--227X.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Susha, I., Grönlund, Å., and Janssen, M. 2015. Driving factors of service innovation using open government data: An exploratory study of entrepreneurs in two countries. Information Polity, 20(1), 19--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Chong, A.Y.L., Chan, F.T. and Ooi, K.B. 2012, "Predicting consumer decisions to adopt mobile commerce: cross country empirical examination between China and Malaysia", Decision Support Systems, 53 (1), 34--43 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
    March 2017
    657 pages
    ISBN:9781450348256
    DOI:10.1145/3047273

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 March 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader