skip to main content
research-article

Mining Exploratory Behavior to Improve Mobile App Recommendations

Published:19 August 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

With the widespread usage of smart phones, more and more mobile apps are developed every day, playing an increasingly important role in changing our lifestyles and business models. In this trend, it becomes a hot research topic for developing effective mobile app recommender systems in both industry and academia. Compared with existing studies about mobile app recommendations, our research aims to improve the recommendation effectiveness based on analyzing a psychological trait of human beings, exploratory behavior, which refers to a type of variety-seeking behavior in unfamiliar domains. To this end, we propose a novel probabilistic model named Goal-oriented Exploratory Model (GEM), integrating exploratory behavior identification with personalized item recommendation. An algorithm combining collapsed Gibbs sampling and Expectation Maximization is developed for model learning and inference. Through extensive experiments conducted on a real dataset, the proposed model demonstrates superior recommendation performances and good interpretability compared with state-of-art recommendation methods. Moreover, empirical analyses on exploratory behavior find that individuals with a strong exploratory tendency exhibit behavioral patterns of variety seeking, risk taking, and higher involvement. Besides, mobile apps that are less popular or in the long tail possess greater potential of arousing exploratory behavior in individuals.

References

  1. Hans Baumgartner and Jan Benedict E. M. Steenkamp. 1996. Exploratory consumer buying behavior: Conceptualization and measurement. International Journal of Research in Marketing 13, 121--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. E. Berlyne. 1962. Motivational problems raised by exploratory and epistemic behavior. In Psychology: A Study of Science, 284--364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christopher Bishop. 2006. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Journal of Electronic Imaging 16, 140--155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Zhiyong Cheng and Jialie Shen. 2016. On effective location-aware music recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 34, 13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mark Claypool, Anuja Gokhale, Tim Miranda, Pavel Murnikov, Dmitry Netes, and Matthew Sartin. 1999. Combining content-based and collaborative filters in an online newspaper. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR Workshop on Recommender Systems, Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. A. Dempster. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 39, 1--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mukund Deshpande and George Karypis. 2004. Item-based top-n recommendation algorithms. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 22, 143--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Xiao Han and Thomas Stibor. 2010. Efficient collapsed Gibbs sampling for latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13, 63--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gregor Heinrich. 2005. Parameter estimation for text analysis. Technical Report. University of Leipzig, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Roland Helm and Sebastian Landschulze. 2008. Optimal stimulation level theory, exploratory consumer behaviour and product adoption: An analysis of underlying structures across product categories. Review of Managerial Science 3, 41--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Yifan Hu, Yehuda Koren, and Chris Volinsky. 2008. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2008 (ICDM’08). IEEE, 263--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Alexandros Karatzoglou, Linas Baltrunas, Karen Church, and Matthias Böhmer. 2012. Climbing the app wall: Enabling mobile app discovery through context-aware recommendations. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’12). ACM, New York, 2527--2530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Karplus, C. Barrett, and R. Hughey. 1998. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 14, 846--856.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Julian Kupiec. 1992. Robust part-of-speech tagging using a hidden markov model. Computer Speech 8 Language 6, 225--242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Takeshi Kurashima, Tomoharu Iwata, Takahide Hoshide, Noriko Takaya, and Ko Fujimura. 2013. Geo topic model: Joint modeling of user's activity area and interests for location recommendation. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 375--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jovian Lin, Kazunari Sugiyama, Min Yen Kan, and Tat Seng Chua. 2013. Addressing cold-start in app recommendation: Latent user models constructed from twitter followers. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, NewYork, 283--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Bin Liu, Deguang Kong, Lei Cen, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, Hongxia Jin, and Hui Xiong. 2015. Personalized mobile app recommendation: Reconciling app functionality and user privacy preference. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Web Search 8 Data Mining. ACM, New York, 315--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Bin Liu, and Hui Xiong. 2013. Point-of-interest recommendation in location-based social networks with topic and location awareness. In SDM, 396--404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Qi Liu, Enhong Chen, Hui Xiong, Yong Ge, Zhongmou Li, and Xiang Wu. 2014. A cocktail approach for travel package recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 26, 278--293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Qi Liu, Yong Ge, Zhongmou Li, Enhong Chen, and Hui Xiong. 2011. Personalized travel package recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 407--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Warren K. Garlington and Helen E. Shimota. 1964. The change seeker index: A measure of the need for variable stimulus input. Psychological Reports 14, 919--924.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. A. Mccart, B. Padmanabhan, and D. J. Berndt. 2009. Goal attainment on long tail web sites: An information foraging approach. Decision Support Systems 55, 235--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Albert Mehrabian and James A. Russell. 1973. A measure of arousal seeking tendency. Environment 8 Behavior 5, 3, 315--333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramesh M. Nallapati, Amr Ahmed, Eric P. Xing, and William W. Cohen. 2008. Joint latent topic models for text and citations. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Las Vegas, Nev., Aug.). 542--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. H. Permuter, J. Francos, and H. Jermyn. 2010. Gaussian mixture models of texture and colour for image database. Proceedings of ICASSP 3, 25--88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Peter Pirolli. 2007. Information foraging theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 8 Technology 61, 2161--2164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card. 1999. Information foraging. Psychological Review 106, 643--675.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. P. S. Raju. 1980. Optimum stimulation level: Its relationship to personality, demographics, and exploratory behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 7, 272--282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Steffen Rendle and Christoph Freudenthaler. 2014. Improving pairwise learning for item recommendation from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 273--282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2012. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 452--461. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Douglas A. Reynolds. 1995. Speaker identification and verification using gaussian mixture speaker models ☆. Speech Communication 17, 91--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Badrul Sarwar, George Karypis, Joseph Konstan, and John Riedl. 2001. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 285--295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Benjamin Schuster Böckler and Alex Bateman. 2007. An introduction to hidden markov models. IEEE ASSP Magazine Appendix 3, 4--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Kent Shi and Kamal Ali. 2012. GetJar mobile application recommendations with very sparse datasets. In ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 204--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jan Benedict E. M. Steenkamp, and Hans Baumgartner. 1992. The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 19, 434--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Jan Benedict E. M. Steenkamp and Steven M. Burgess. 2002. Optimum stimulation level and exploratory consumer behavior in an emerging consumer market. International Journal of Research in Marketing 19, 131--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Gábor Takács and Domonkos Tikk. 2012. Alternating least squares for personalized ranking. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 83--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Hans-Georg Voss and Heidi Keller. 2013. Curiosity and exploration: Theories and results. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Chong Wang and David M. Blei. 2011. Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 448--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Xiaolong Wang, Chengxiang Zhai, and Dan Roth. 2013. Understanding evolution of research themes: A probabilistic generative model for citations. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 1115--1123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Andrew D. Wilson and Aaron F. Bobick. 2010. Parametric hidden markov models for gesture recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis 8 Machine Intelligence 21, 884--900. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Hao Xu, Jingdong Wang, Xian Sheng Hua, and Shipeng Li. 2009. Tag refinement by regularized LDA. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Multimedia 2009 (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Oct. 19--24). 573--576. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Hongzhi Yin, Bin Cui, Yizhou Sun, Zhiting Hu, and Ling Chen. 2014. LCARS: A spatial item recommender system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 32, 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Peifeng Yin, Ping Luo, Wang Chien Lee, and Min Wang. 2013. App recommendation: A contest between satisfaction and temptation. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Web Search 8 Data Mining. 395--404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Quan Yuan, Gao Cong, and Chin Yew Lin. 2014. COM: A generative model for group recommendation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery 8 Data Mining. 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jing Zhang, Jie Tang, Honglei Zhuang, Wing Ki Leung, and Juanzi Li. 2014. Role-aware conformity influence modeling and analysis in social networks. In Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Hengshu Zhu, Hui Xiong, Yong Ge, and Enhong Chen. 2014. Mobile app recommendations with security and privacy awareness. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 951--960. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Marvin Zuckerman. 1979. Sensation seeking: Beyond optimal level of arousal. (Hillsdale, N.J. and New York). Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Mining Exploratory Behavior to Improve Mobile App Recommendations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
        ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 35, Issue 4
        Special issue: Search, Mining and their Applications on Mobile Devices
        October 2017
        461 pages
        ISSN:1046-8188
        EISSN:1558-2868
        DOI:10.1145/3112649
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 August 2017
        • Accepted: 1 March 2017
        • Revised: 1 January 2017
        • Received: 1 June 2016
        Published in tois Volume 35, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader