skip to main content
10.1145/3110025.3110068acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

Revealing and Detecting Malicious Retweeter Groups

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 July 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Retweeting/sharing action has enabled information to be cascaded to distant nodes on social network. Unfortunately, malicious users as a group have taken advantage of the retweeting function with coordinated behavior to falsely distort the volume of specific keywords, topics or URLs for promotional purposes (e.g., spreading fake news, and increasing public visibility of products or services). Unfortunately, little is known about their retweeting behavior as a group and how to detect them based on group-based signals. To fill the gap, in this paper, we (i) propose Attractor+ algorithm to extract retweeter groups, members of each of which have similar retweeting behavior; (ii) analyze underlying characteristics of malicious and legitimate retweeter groups; (iii) propose group-based features to catch synchronized and coordinated behavior; and build a predictor to classify if a group is malicious. Experimental results show that our proposed method outperformed existing approaches.

References

  1. Z. Yang, J. Guo, K. Cai, J. Tang, J. Li, L. Zhang, and Z. Su, "Understanding retweeting behaviors in social networks," in CIKM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sysomos, "https://sysomos.com/inside-twitter/twitter-retweet-stats," in Replies and Retweets on Twitter, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. B. Liu, J. Luo, J. Cao, X. Ni, B. Liu, and X. Fu, "On crowd-retweeting spamming campaign in social networks," in ICC, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Z. Qunyan, Z. Chi, C. Peng, Q. Weining, and Z. Aoying, "Detecting spamming groups in social media based on latent graph," in ADC, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. Chavoshi, H. Hamooni, and A. Mueen, "Debot: Twitter bot detection via warped correlation," in ICDM, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Cao, J. Caverlee, K. Lee, H. Ge, and J. Chung, "Organic or organized? exploring url sharing behavior," in CIKM, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. G. Maria, C. Despoina, S. Neil, B. Alex, F. Christos, and V. Athena, "Nd-sync: Detecting synchronized fraud activities," in PAKDD, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. Lee, J. Caverlee, Z. Cheng, and D. Z. Sui, "Campaign extraction from social media," ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. K. G. Rumi, S. Tawan, "Entropy-based classification of 'retweeting'activity on twitter," arXiv:1106.0346, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Ferraz Costa, Y. Yamaguchi, A. Juci Machado Traina, C. Traina Jr, and C. Faloutsos, "Rsc: Mining and modeling temporal activity in social media," in KDD. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Boyd, Danah, S. Golder, and G. Lotan, "Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter," in HICSS, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. N. Naveed, T. Gottron, J. Kunegis, and A. C. Alhadi, "Bad news travel fast: A content-based analysis of interestingness on twitter," in WebSci, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Petrovi, "Rt to win! predicting message propagation in twitter," in ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Suh, L. Hong, P. Pirolli, and E. H. Chi, "Want to be retweeted? large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in twitter network," in SocialCom, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. Hong, O. Dan, and B. D. Davison, "Predicting popular messages in twitter," in International World Wide Web Conference, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. K. Lee, J. Mahmud, J. Chen, M. Zhou, and J. Nichols, "Who will retweet this? automatically identifying and engaging strangers on twitter to spread information," in IUI, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. H. Gao, J. Hu, C. Wilson, Z. Li, Y. Chen, and B. Y. Zhao, "Detecting and characterizing social spam campaigns," in SIGCOMM. ACM, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. E. Ferrara, O. Varol, C. Davis, F. Menczer, and A. Flammini, "The rise of social bots," arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.5225, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. V. D. Blondel, J.-L. Guillaume, R. Lambiotte, and E. Lefebvre, "Fast unfolding of communities in large networks," Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. Shao, Z. Han, Q. Yang, and T. Zhou, "Community detection based on distance dynamics," in KDD, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Fortunato, "Community detection in graphs," Physics reports, vol. 486, no. 3, pp. 75--174, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. R. Zafarani and H. Liu, "Connecting users across social media sites: a behavioral-modeling approach," in KDD, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. D. V. Huntsberger, Elements of statistical inference. Allyn & Bacon, Inc., 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data," biometrics, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. K. Lee, B. D. Eoff, and J. Caverlee, "Seven months with the devils: A long-term study of content polluters on twitter," in ICWSM, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Revealing and Detecting Malicious Retweeter Groups

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASONAM '17: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2017
        July 2017
        698 pages
        ISBN:9781450349932
        DOI:10.1145/3110025

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 July 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate116of549submissions,21%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader