skip to main content
10.1145/3123266.3123282acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Protest Activity Detection and Perceived Violence Estimation from Social Media Images

Published:19 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We develop a novel visual model which can recognize protesters, describe their activities by visual attributes and estimate the level of perceived violence in an image. Studies of social media and protests use natural language processing to track how individuals use hashtags and links, often with a focus on those items' diffusion. These approaches, however, may not be effective in fully characterizing actual real-world protests (e.g., violent or peaceful) or estimating the demographics of participants (e.g., age, gender, and race) and their emotions. Our system characterizes protests along these dimensions. We have collected geotagged tweets and their images from 2013-2017 and analyzed multiple major protest events in that period. A multi-task convolutional neural network is employed in order to automatically classify the presence of protesters in an image and predict its visual attributes, perceived violence and exhibited emotions. We also release the UCLA Protest Image Dataset, our novel dataset of 40,764 images (11,659 protest images and hard negatives) with various annotations of visual attributes and sentiments. Using this dataset, we train our model and demonstrate its effectiveness. We also present experimental results from various analysis on geotagged image data in several prevalent protest events. Our dataset will be made accessible at https://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/comm/jjoo/mm-protest/.

References

  1. Brandon Amos, Bartosz Ludwiczuk, and Mahadev Satyanarayanan. 2016. Open-Face: A general-purpose face recognition library with mobile applications. Technical Report. Carnegie Mellon University-CS-16--118, Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lefteris Anastasopoulos and Jake Williams. 2016. Identifying violent protest activity with scalable machine learning *. (2016). http://scholar.harvard.edu/janastasGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pablo Barberá, Ning Wang, Richard Bonneau, John T. Jost, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua Tucker, and Sandra González-Bailón. 2015. The Critical Periphery in the Growth of Social Protests. PloS ONE 10, 11 (2015), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Marco Bastos, Raquel Recuero, and Gabriela Zago. 2014. Taking tweets to the streets: A spatial analysis of the Vinegar Protests in Brazil. First Monday 19, 3 (2014), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ralph Allan Bradley and Milton E Terry. 1952. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39, 3/4 (1952), 324--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Markus Brenner and Ebroul Izquierdo. 2012. Social event detection and retrieval in collaborative photo collections. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, 21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Liang-Hua Chen, Hsi-Wen Hsu, Li-Yun Wang, and Chih-Wen Su. 2011. Violence detection in movies. In Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization (CGIV), 2011 Eighth International Conference on. IEEE, 119--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fillipe DM De Souza, Guillermo C Chavez, Eduardo A do Valle Jr, and Arnaldo de A Araújo. 2010. Violence detection in video using spatio-temporal features. In Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI), 2010 23rd SIBGRAPI Conference on. IEEE, 224--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jesse Driscoll and Zachary C. Steinert-Threlkeld. 2017. Structure, Agency, Hege- mony, and Action: Ukrainian Nationalism in East Ukraine. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruben Enikolopov, Alexey Makarin, and Maria Petrova. 2016. Social Media and Protest Participation: Evidence from Russia. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Matthew Feinberga, Robb Willer, and Chlose Kovacheff. 2017. Extreme Protest Tactics Reduce Popular Support for Social Movements. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dana R. Fisher. 2014. Studying Large-Scale Protest: Understanding Mobilization and Participation at the People's Climate March. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Debashis Ganguly, Mohammad H Mofrad, and Adriana Kovashka. 2017. Detecting Sexually Provocative Images. In Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE, 660--668.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. CJ Hutto Eric Gilbert. 2014. VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. In Eighth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-14). Available at (20/04/16) http://comp.social.gatech.edu/papers/icwsm14.vader.hutto. pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sandra Gonzalez-Bailon, Javier Borge-Holthoefer, and Yamir Moreno. 2013. Broadcasters and Hidden Influentials in Online Protest Diffusion. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 7 (mar 2013), 943--965.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Helmut Grabner, Fabian Nater, Michel Druey, and Luc Van Gool. 2013. Visual interestingness in image sequences. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, 1017--1026. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tal Hassner, Yossi Itcher, and Orit Kliper-Gross. 2012. Violent flows: Real-time detection of violent crowd behavior. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 770--778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Phillip Isola, Jianxiong Xiao, Antonio Torralba, and Aude Oliva. 2011. What makes an image memorable?. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 145--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jungseock Joo, Weixin Li, Francis Steen, and Song-Chun Zhu. 2014. Visual Persuasion: Inferring Communicative Intents of Images. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 216--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jungseock Joo, Francis F Steen, and Song-Chun Zhu. 2015. Automated facial trait judgment and election outcome prediction: Social dimensions of face. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 3712--3720. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Adriana Kovashka, Devi Parikh, and Kristen Grauman. 2012. Whittlesearch: Image search with relative attribute feedback. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2973--2980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Timur Kuran. 1989. Sparks and Prairie Fires: A Theory of Unanticipated Political Revolution. Public Choice 61, 1 (1989), 41--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Kalev H. Leetaru, Shaowen Wang, Guofeng Cao, Anand Padmanabhan, and Eric Shook. 2013. Mapping the global Twitter heartbeat: The geography of Twitter. First Monday 18, 5--6 (2013), 1--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Andrew T. Little. 2015. Communication Technology and Protest. Journal of Politics 78, 1 (2015), 152--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Ziwei Liu, Ping Luo, Xiaogang Wang, and Xiaoou Tang. 2015. Deep learning face attributes in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 3730--3738. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Susanne Lohmann. 1994. The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989--91. World Politics 47, 1 (1994), 42--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Virginia Lopez and Jonathan Watts. 2017. Deaths and injuries reported amid "mother of all marches" in Venezuela. (apr 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Doug McAdam. 1986. Recruitment to High-Risk Activism: The Case of Freedom Summer. Amer. J. Sociology 92, 1 (1986), 64--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Jonathan Mercer. 2010. Emotional Beliefs. International Organization 64, 01 (jan 2010), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Edward N. Muller and Karl-Dieter Opp. 1986. Rational Choice and Rebellious Collective Action. The American Political Science Review 80, 2 (1986), 471--488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Enrique Bermejo Nievas, Oscar Deniz Suarez, Gloria Bueno García, and Rahul Sukthankar. 2011. Violence detection in video using computer vision techniques. In International conference on Computer analysis of images and patterns. Springer, 332--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Devi Parikh and Kristen Grauman. 2011. Relative attributes. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 503--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Wendy Pearlman. 2013. Emotions and the Microfoundations of the Arab Uprisings. Perspectives on Politics 11, 02 (may 2013), 387--409.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Georgios Petkos, Symeon Papadopoulos, and Yiannis Kompatsiaris. 2012. Social event detection using multimodal clustering and integrating supervisory signals. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. ACM, 23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Georgios Petkos, Symeon Papadopoulos, Emmanouil Schinas, and Yiannis Kompatsiaris. 2014. Graph-based multimodal clustering for social event detection in large collections of images. In International Conference on Multimedia Modeling. Springer, 146--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Shengsheng Qian, Tianzhu Zhang, Changsheng Xu, and M Shamim Hossain. 2015. Social event classification via boosted multimodal supervised latent dirichlet allocation. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM) 11, 2 (2015), 27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Miriam Redi, Neil O'Hare, Rossano Schifanella, Michele Trevisiol, and Alejandro Jaimes. 2014. 6 seconds of sound and vision: Creativity in micro-videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 4272--4279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Timo Reuter, Symeon Papadopoulos, Giorgos Petkos, Vasileios Mezaris, Yiannis Kompatsiaris, Philipp Cimiano, Christopher de Vries, and Shlomo Geva. 2013. Social event detection at mediaeval 2013: Challenges, datasets, and evaluation. In Proceedings of the MediaEval 2013 Multimedia Benchmark Workshop Barcelona, Spain, October 18-19, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Jacob N Shapiro and David A Siegel. 2015. Coordination and security: How mobile communications affect insurgency. Journal of Peace Research 52, 3 (feb 2015), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Stuart Soroka, Peter Loewen, Patrick Fournier, and Daniel Rubenson. 2016. The Impact of News Photos on Support for Military Action. Political Communication 33, 4 (2016), 563--582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Zachary C. Steinert-Threlkeld. 2017. Spontaneous Collective Action: Peripheral Mobilization During the Arab Spring. American Political Science Review 111, 02 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Zachary C. Steinert-Threlkeld, Delia Mocanu, Alessandro Vespignani, and James Fowler. 2015. Online social networks and offline protest. EPJ Data Science 4, 1 (2015), 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Zeynep Tufekci. 2014. Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representative- ness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls Pre-print. In Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Ann Arbor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Gordon Tullock. 1971. The Paradox of Revolution. Public Choice 11 (1971), 89--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Yu Wang, Yuncheng Li, and Jiebo Luo. 2016. Deciphering the 2016 US Presidential Campaign in the Twitter Sphere: A Comparison of the Trumpists and Clintonists. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Guobin Yang. 2000. Achieving Emotions in Collective Action: Emotional Processes and Movement Mobilization in the 1989 Chinese Student Movement. The Sociological Quarterly 41, 4 (sep 2000), 593--614.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Xiaoshan Yang, Tianzhu Zhang, and Changsheng Xu. 2015. Cross-domain feature learning in multimedia. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 17, 1 (2015), 64--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Quanzeng You, Liangliang Cao, Yang Cong, Xianchao Zhang, and Jiebo Luo. 2015. A multifaceted approach to social multimedia-based prediction of elections. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 17, 12 (2015), 2271--2280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Protest Activity Detection and Perceived Violence Estimation from Social Media Images

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MM '17: Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia
          October 2017
          2028 pages
          ISBN:9781450349062
          DOI:10.1145/3123266

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 October 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          MM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate189of684submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          MM '24
          MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
          October 28 - November 1, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader