skip to main content
10.1145/3127540.3127577acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

Improving BLE Distance Estimation and Classification Using TX Power and Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis

Published:21 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Distance estimation and proximity classification techniques are essential for numerous IoT applications and in providing efficient services in smart cities. Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) is designed for IoT devices, and its received signal strength indicator (RSSI) has been used in distance and proximity estimation, though they are noisy and unreliable. In this study, we leverage the BLE TX power level in BLE models.We adopt a comparative analysis framework that utilizes our extensive data library of measurements. It considers commonly used state-of-the-art model, in addition to our data-driven proposed approach. The RSSI and TX power are integrated into several parametric models such as log shadowing and Android Beacon library models, and machine learning models such as linear regression, decision trees, random forests and neural networks. Specific mobile apps are developed for the study experiment. We have collected more than 1.8 millions of BLE records between encounters with various distances that range from 0.5 to 22 meters in an indoor environment. Interestingly, considering TX power when estimating the distance reduced the mean errors by up to 46% in parametric models and by up to 35% in machine learning models. Also, the proximity classification accuracy increased by up to 103% and 70% in parametric and machine learning models, respectively. This work is one of the first studies (if not the first) that analyze in depth the TX power variations in improving the distance estimation and classification.

References

  1. A.Kwiecien, M.Mackowski, M.Kojder, and M.Manczyk. 2015. Reliability of bluetooth smart technology for indoor localization system. In International Conference on Computer Networks. Springer, 444--454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. S. Aman, H. Jiang, C. Quint, K. Yelamarthi, and A. Abdelgawad. 2016. Reliability evaluation of iBeacon for micro-localization. In (UEMCON). IEEE, 1--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S Bertuletti, A Cereatti, U Della, M Caldara, and M Galizzi. 2016. Indoor distance estimated from Bluetooth Low Energy signal strength: Comparison of regression models.. In Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS). IEEE, 1--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. H. Cho, J. Ji, Z. Chen, H. Park, and W. Lee. 2015. Accurate Distance Estimation between Things: A Self-correcting Approach. Open Journal of Internet Of Things (OJIOT) 1, 2 (2015), 19--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bluetooth Low Energy. https://www.bluetooth.com/what-is-bluetoothtechnology/ how-it-works/low-energy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Julian J Faraway. 2002. Practical regression and ANOVA using R. (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Here's how the Internet of Things will explode by 2020. www.businessinsider.com/iot-ecosystem-internet-of-things-forecasts-and-businessopportunities- 2016--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Z. Jianyong, L. Haiyong, C. Zili, and L. Zhaohui. 2014. RSSI based Bluetooth low energy indoor positioning. In (IPIN). IEEE, 526--533. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J.Xu, W.Liu, F.Lang, Y.Zhang, C.Wang, et al. 2010. Distance measurement model based on RSSI in WSN. Wireless Sensor Network 2, 8 (2010), 606--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. K.Urano, K. Hiroi, K. Kaji, and N. Kawaguchi. 2016. A Location Estimation Method using BLE Tags Distributed Among Participants of a Large-Scale Exhibition. In MOBIQUITOUS. ACM, 124--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Andy Liaw and Matthew Wiener. 2002. Classification and regression by random- Forest. R news 2, 3 (2002), 18--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Android Beacon Library. https://altbeacon.github.io/android-beacon-library/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Al Qathrady and A.Helmy. https://www.cise.ufl.edu/~qathrady/reports/BLE.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Al Qathrady, A. Helmy, and K. Almuzaini. 2016. Infection tracing in smart hospitals. In (WiMob). IEEE, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Brian Ripley, William Venables, and Maintainer Brian Ripley. 2016. Package "nnet". R package version (2016), 3--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. R.Tabata, A.Hayashi Arisa, S.Tokunaga, S.Saiki, M.Nakamura, and S.Matsumoto. 2016. Implementation and evaluation of BLE proximity detection mechanism for Pass-by Framework.. In Computer and Information Science. IEEE/ACIS, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Terry M Therneau, Beth Atkinson, Brian Ripley, et al. 2010. rpart: Recursive partitioning. R package version. R package version 3 (2010), 1--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. www.cdc.gov/hicpac/2007IP/2007ip part1.html. CDC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Y. Zhuang, J. Yang, Y. Li, L. Qi, and N. El-Sheimy. 2016. Smartphone-based indoor localization with bluetooth low energy beacons. Sensors 16, 5 (2016), 596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Improving BLE Distance Estimation and Classification Using TX Power and Machine Learning: A Comparative Analysis

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MSWiM '17: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Modelling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems
        November 2017
        340 pages
        ISBN:9781450351621
        DOI:10.1145/3127540

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 November 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        MSWiM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate29of142submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader