skip to main content
10.1145/3137065.3137069acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswipsceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Development of Computational Thinking Skills through Unplugged Activities in Primary School

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computational thinking is nowadays being widely adopted and investigated. Educators and researchers are using two main approaches to teach these skills in schools: with computer programming exercises, and with unplugged activities that do not require the use of digital devices or any kind of specific hardware. While the former is the mainstream approach, the latter is especially important for schools that do not have proper technology resources, Internet connections or even electrical power. However, there is a lack of investigations that prove the effectiveness of the unplugged activities in the development of computational thinking skills, particularly for primary schools. This paper, which summarizes a quasi-experiment carried out in two primary schools in Spain, tries to shed some light on this regard. The results show that students in the experimental groups, who took part in the unplugged activities, enhanced their computational thinking skills significantly more than their peers in the control groups who did not participate during the classes, proving that the unplugged approach may be effective for the development of this ability.

References

  1. Phillip L. Ackerman and Eric L. Rolfhus. 1999. The locus of adult intelligence: Knowledge, abilities, and nonability traits. Psychology and Aging 14, 2 (1999), 314--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ashish Aggarwal, Christina Gardner-McCune, and David S. Touretzky. 2017. Evaluating the Effect of Using Physical Manipulatives to Foster Computational Thinking in Elementary School. ACM Press, 9--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Association for Computing Machinery. 2003. A Model Curriculum for K-12 Computer Science: Final Report of the ACM K-12 Task Force Curriculum Committee. ACM, New York. OCLC: 907036381. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Anja Balanskat and Katja Engelhardt. 2015. Computing our future: Computer programming and coding - Priorities, school curricula and initiatives across Europe. (Oct. 2015). http://www.eun.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=3596b121-941c-4296-a760-0f4e4795d6fa&groupId=43887Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tim Bell, Ian H. Witten, and Mike Fellows. 1998. Computer Science Unplugged... - Off-line activities and games for all ages (draft) (1 ed.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stefania Bocconi, Augusto Chioccariello, Giuliana Dettori, Anusca Ferrari, Katja Engelhardt, Panagiotis Kampylis, and Yves Punie. 2016. Developing Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education - Implications for policy and practice. Technical Report. Publications Office of the European Union.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Christian Brackmann, Dante Barone, Ana Casali, Rafael Boucinha, and Susana Munoz-Hernandez. 2016. Computational thinking: Panorama of the Americas. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Karen Brennan and Mitchel Resnick. 2012. New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Vancouver, Canada, 1--25. http://scratched.gse.harvard.edu/ct/files/AERA2012.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gleider Campos, Simone Cavalheiro, Luciana Foss, Ana Pernas, Clause Piana, Marilton Aguiar, André Du Bois, and Renata Reiser. 2014. Organização de Informações via Pensamento Computacional: Relato de Atividade Aplicada no Ensino Fundamental. 20o. Workshop de Informática na Escola (WIE 2014) (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jacob Cohen. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ (1988), 20--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Paul Curzon. 2013. cs4fn and computational thinking unplugged. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. ACM, 47--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Paul Curzon, Peter W McOwan, Nicola Plant, and Laura R Meagher. 2014. Introducing teachers to computational thinking using unplugged storytelling. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. ACM, 89--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mark Engelberg. 2015. Code Master Programming Logic Game, Thinkfun Inc. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hylke Faber, Menno Wierdsma, Richard Doornbos, Jan Salvador van der Ven, and Kevin de Vette. 2017. Teaching Computational Thinking to Primary School Students via Unplugged Programming Lessons. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network 12 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Yvon Feaster, Luke Segars, Sally K Wahba, and Jason O Hallstrom. 2011. Teaching CS unplugged in the high school (with limited success). In Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. ACM, 248--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Anna Gardeli and Spyros Vosinakis. 2017. Creating the Computer Player: An Engaging and Collaborative Approach to Introduce Computational Thinking by Combining 'Unplugged' Activities with Visual Programming. Italian Journal of Educational Technology 1 (July 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Grover and R. Pea. 2013. Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher 42, 1 (Jan. 2013), 38--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Filiz Kalelioglu, Yasemin Gülbahar, and Volkan Kukul. 2016. A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing 4, 3 (2016), 583.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lorenz Klopfenstein, Andiy Fedosyeyev, and Alessandro Bogliolo. 2017. BRINGING AN UNPLUGGED CODING CARD GAME TO AUGMENTED REALITY. 9800--9805.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lynn Lambert and Heather Guiffre. 2009. Computer science outreach in an elementary school. Journal of Computing Sciences in colleges 24, 3 (2009), 118-- 124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Linda Liukas. 2015. Hello Ruby: adventures in coding. Feiwel & Friends.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sze Yee Lye and Joyce Hwee Ling Koh. 2014. Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior 41 (2014), 51--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Scott B. Morris. 2008. Estimating Effect Sizes From Pretest-Posttest-Control Group Designs. Organizational Research Methods 11, 2 (April 2008), 364--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Scott B. Morris and Richard P. DeShon. 2002. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods 7, 1 (2002), 105--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Brandon Rodriguez, Kennicutt Stephen, Cyndi Rader, and Tracy Camp. 2017. Assessing Computational Thinking in CS Unplugged Activities. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, Seattle, Washington, USA, 501--506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Marcos Román-González, Jesús Moreno-León, and Gregorio Robles. 2017. Complementary Tools for Computational Thinking Assessment. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education (CTE 2017), S. C Kong, J Sheldon, and K. Y Li (Eds.). The Education University of Hong Kong, 154--159. http://www.eduhk.hk/cte2017/doc/CTE2017Proceedings.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Marcos Román-González. 2015. Computational Thinking Test: Design Guidelines and Content Validation. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN 2015). IATED, Barcelona, Spain, 2436--2444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Marcos Román-González. 2016. Codigoalfabetización y Pensamiento Computacional en Educación Primaria y Secundaria: Validación de un Instrumento y Evaluación de Programas. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Marcos Román-González, Juan-Carlos Pérez-González, and Carmen Jiménez-Fernández. 2017. Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior 72 (July 2017), 678--691. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Sue Sentance and Andrew Csizmadia. 2015. Teachers' perspectives on successful strategies for teaching Computing in school. Paper presented at IFIP TCS 2015 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rivka Taub, Mordechai Ben-Ari, and Michal Armoni. 2009. The effect of CS unplugged on middle-school students' views of CS. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 41, 3 (2009), 99--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Renate Thies and Jan Vahrenhold. 2013. On plugging "unplugged" into CS classes. ACM Press, 365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. R. Unnikrishnan, N. Amrita, Alexander Muir, and Bhavani Rao. 2016. Of Elephants and Nested Loops: How to Introduce Computing to Youth in Rural India. ACM Press, 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Peter Wallet. 2014. ICT in Education in Asia: A comparative analysis of ICT integration and e-readiness in schools across Asia. Technical Report. UNESCO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Peter Wallet. 2015. ICT in Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative analysis of basic e-readiness in schools. Technical Report. UNESCO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Jeannette M. Wing. 2006. Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49, 3 (March 2006), 33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. J. M Wing. 2008. Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 366, 1881 (Oct. 2008), 3717--3725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Development of Computational Thinking Skills through Unplugged Activities in Primary School

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WiPSCE '17: Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education
          November 2017
          128 pages
          ISBN:9781450354288
          DOI:10.1145/3137065

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          © 2017 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 November 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          WiPSCE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate16of37submissions,43%Overall Acceptance Rate104of279submissions,37%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader