skip to main content
10.1145/3144769.3144778acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

The ALPINE In Situ Infrastructure: Ascending from the Ashes of Strawman

Published:12 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces ALPINE, a flyweight in situ infrastructure. The infrastructure is designed for leading-edge supercomputers, and has support for both distributed-memory and shared-memory parallelism. It can take advantage of computing power on both conventional CPU architectures and on many-core architectures such as NVIDIA GPUs or the Intel Xeon Phi. Further, it has a flexible design that supports for integration of new visualization and analysis routines and libraries. The paper describes ALPINE's interface choices and architecture, and also reports on initial experiments performed using the infrastructure.

References

  1. 2017. MFEM: Modular finite element methods. (2017). http://mfem.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. James Ahrens, Berk Geveci, and Charles Law. 2005. Paraview: An end-user tool for large data visualization. The Visualization Handbook 717 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. James Ahrens, Sébastien Jourdain, Patrick O'Leary, John Patchett, David H. Rogers, and Mark Petersen. 2014. An Image-based Approach to Extreme Scale in Situ Visualization and Analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC '14). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 424--434. https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.2014.40 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Utkarsh Ayachit et al. 2016. The SENSEI Generic in Situ Interface. In Proceedings of the 2Nd Workshop on In Situ Infrastructures for Enabling Extreme-scale Analysis and Visualization (ISAV '16). 40--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Utkarsh Ayachit, Andrew Bauer, Berk Geveci, Patrick O'Leary, Kenneth Moreland, Nathan Fabian, and Jeffrey Mauldin. 2015. Paraview catalyst: Enabling in situ data analysis and visualization. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on In Situ Infrastructures for Enabling Extreme-Scale Analysis and Visualization. ACM, 25--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Andrew C. Bauer, Hasan Abbasi, James Ahrens, Hank Childs, Berk Geveci, Scott Klasky, Kenneth Moreland, Patrick O'Leary, Venkatram Vishwanath, Brad Whitlock, and E. Wes Bethel. 2016. In Situ Methods, Infrastructures, and Applications on High Performance Computing Platforms, a State-of-the-art (STAR) Report. Computer Graphics Forum, Proceedings of Eurovis 2016 35, 3 (June 2016). LBNL-1005709.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hank Childs et al. 2012. VisIt: An End-User Tool For Visualizing and Analyzing Very Large Data. In High Performance Visualization---Enabling Extreme-Scale Scientific Insight. CRC Press/Francis--Taylor Group, 357--372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. William Gropp, Ewing Lusk, Nathan Doss, and Anthony Skjellum. 1996. A high-performance, portable implementation of the MPI message passing interface standard. Parallel computing 22, 6 (1996), 789--828. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Harrison, P. Navràtil, M. Moussalem, M. Jiang, and H. Childs. 2012. Efficient Dynamic Derived Field Generation on Many-Core Architectures Using Python. In Proceedings of the 2012 Workshop on Python for High Performance and Scientific Computing (PyHPC 2012). 583--592. https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.Companion.2012.82Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. 2017. Conduit: Simplified Data Exchange for HPC Simulations. (2017). https://software.llnl.gov/conduit/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. 2017. Conduit: Simplified Data Exchange for HPC Simulations - Conduit Blueprint. (2017). https://software.llnl.gov/conduit/blueprint.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Matthew Larsen, Eric Brugger, Hank Childs, Jim Eliot, Kevin Griffin, and Cyrus Harrison. 2015. Strawman: A Batch In Situ Visualization and Analysis Infrastructure for Multi-Physics Simulation Codes. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on In Situ Infrastructures for Enabling Extreme-Scale Analysis and Visualization (ISAV2015). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 30--35. https://doi.org/10.1145/2828612.2828625 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jay F. Lofstead, Scott Klasky, Karsten Schwan, Norbert Podhorszki, and Chen Jin. 2008. Flexible IO and Integration for Scientific Codes Through the Adaptable IO System (ADIOS). In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Challenges of Large Applications in Distributed Environments (CLADE '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/1383529.1383533 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jeremy S. Meredith, Sean Ahern, Dave Pugmire, and Robert Sisneros. 2012. EAVL: The Extreme-scale Analysis and Visualization Library. In Eurographics Symposium on Parallel Graphics and Visualization. The Eurographics Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Paul Messina. 2017. The Exascale Computing Project. Computing in Science & Engineering 19, 3 (2017), 63--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kenneth Moreland, Christopher Sewell, William Usher, Lita Lo, Jeremy Meredith, David Pugmire, James Kress, Hendrik Schroots, Kwan-Liu Ma, Hank Childs, Matthew Larsen, Chun-Ming Chen, Robert Maynard, and Berk Geveci. 2016. VTK-m: Accelerating the Visualization Toolkit for Massively Threaded Architectures. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications (CG&A) 36, 3 (May/June 2016), 48--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Tom Peterka, Robert Ross, Attila Gyulassy, Valerio Pascucci, Wesley Kendall, Han-Wei Shen, Teng-Yok Lee, and Abon Chaudhuri. 2011. Scalable parallel building blocks for custom data analysis. In Large Data Analysis and Visualization (LDAV), 2011 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 105--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Tom Peterka, Robert Ross, Wesley Kendall, Attila Gyulassy, Valerio Pascucci, Han-Wei Shen, Teng-Yok Lee, and Abon Chaudhuri. 2011. Scalable Parallel Building Blocks for Custom Data Analysis. In Proceedings of Large Data Analysis and Visualization Symposium LDAV'11. Providence, RI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. R Core Team. 2000. R language definition. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Brad Whitlock, Jean M. Favre, and Jeremy S. Meredith. 2011. Parallel in Situ Coupling of Simulation with a Fully Featured Visualization System. In Proceedings of the 11th Eurographics Conference on Parallel Graphics and Visualization (EGPGV). 101--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The ALPINE In Situ Infrastructure: Ascending from the Ashes of Strawman

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              ISAV'17: Proceedings of the In Situ Infrastructures on Enabling Extreme-Scale Analysis and Visualization
              November 2017
              53 pages
              ISBN:9781450351393
              DOI:10.1145/3144769

              Copyright © 2017 ACM

              © 2017 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of the United States government. As such, the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 12 November 2017

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • short-paper
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              ISAV'17 Paper Acceptance Rate9of28submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate23of63submissions,37%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader