skip to main content
10.1145/3149858.3149860acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Disentangle crime hot spots and displacements in space and time: an analysis for Chicago from 2001 to 2016

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Violence and crime have been regarded as one of the notorious behaviors against humanity. With the rapid development of Information and Communications Technology (ICT), increasing amount of crime data become much more available and useful not only for police dispatch and crime prevention, but also for providing important references for the personal safety of local residents and visitors, especially in large cities. In this paper, we apply statistical approaches and graph theory to characterize the spatiotemporal properties of Chicago crime data from 2001 to 2016. First, we improved the previous Space-Time Kernel Density Estimation (STKDE) methods in computational efficiency. We proved that our improved method to compute STKDE has linear time computational complexity, which is experimentally verified to be much faster than previous methods. Second, we applied our improved STKDE method to demonstrate the intensities and hot spots of crime distribution in Chicago from 2001 to 2016. In order to reveal the displacement of crime incidents (i.e. movements of the hot spots), we detected the locations of highest crime hot spots at specified time intervals, and created hot spot displacement graphs based on whether a geographic location continues to be a crime hot spot across time intervals. Finally, the method of longest path on Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG) was applied on the hot spot displacement graph in addition to the analysis of the number of components and their sizes of the graph. The result showed spatial crime displacement and temporal crime duration patterns. The proposed method advanced our knowledge in digital humanities, which can be applied to other cities, providing useful information for public safety.

References

  1. T. Bailey and Q. Gatrell. 1995. Interactive spatial data analysis. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chris Brunsdon, Jonathan Corcoran, and Gary Higgs. 2007. Visualising space and time in crime patterns: A comparison of methods. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 31, 1 (2007), 52--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Chainey and J. Ratcliffe. 2013. GIS and crime mapping. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Chalfin. 2013. Economic Costs of Crime. The Encyclopedia of Crime & Punishment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Thomas H. Cormen, Charles E. Leiserson, Ronald L. Rivest, and Clifford Stein. 2009. Introduction to Algorithms (3 ed.). MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eric Delmelle, Coline Dony, Irene Casas, Meijuan Jia, and Wenwu Tang. 2014. Visualizing the impact of space-time uncertainties on dengue fever patterns. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 28, 5 (2014), 1107--1127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. U. Demšar and K. Virrantaus. 2010. Space-time density of trajectories: exploring spatio-temporal patterns in movement data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 24, 10 (2010), 1527--1542. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. The OpenStreetMap Foundation. 2017. The Open Street Map. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Slippy_map_tilenames. (2017). Accessed: 2017-06-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. 1979. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tomoki Nakaya and Keiji Yano. 2010. Visualising Crime Clusters in a Space-time Cube: An Exploratory Data-analysis Approach Using Space-time Kernel Density Estimation and Scan Statistics. Transactions in GIS 14, 3 (2010), 223--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. E. Poulsen and L. W. Kennedy. 2004. Using dasymetric mapping for spatially aggregated crime data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 20, 3 (2004), 243--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lawrence W. Sherman, Patrick R. Gartin, and Michael E. Buerger. 1989. Hot spots of predatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place*. Criminology 27, 1 (1989), 27--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Martin B. Short, P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Andrea L. Bertozzi, and George E. Tita. 2010. Dissipation and displacement of hotspots in reaction-diffusion models of crime. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 9 (2010), 3961--3965. arXiv:http://www.pnas.org/content/107/9/3961.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. B. W. Silverman. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GeoHumanities '17: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Geospatial Humanities
    November 2017
    60 pages
    ISBN:9781450354967
    DOI:10.1145/3149858

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 November 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate15of21submissions,71%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader