skip to main content
10.1145/3170427.3188537acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Exploring Data in Virtual Reality: Comparisons with 2D Data Visualizations

Published:20 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Virtual Reality (VR) has often been discussed as a promising medium for immersive data visualization and exploration. However, few studies have evaluated users' open-ended exploration of multi-dimensional datasets using VR and compared the results with that of traditional (2D) visualizations. Using a workload- and insight-based evaluation methodology, we conducted a user study to perform such a comparison. We find that there is no overall task-workload difference between traditional visualizations and visualizations in VR, but there are differences in the accuracy and depth of insights that users gain. Our results also suggest that users feel more satisfied and successful when using VR data exploration tools, thus demonstrating the potential of VR as an engaging medium for visual data analytics.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

lbw1278-file3.mp4

mp4

13.2 MB

References

  1. Ahlberg, C., and Shneiderman, B. Visual information seeking: Tight coupling of dynamic query filters with starfield displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '94, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 1994), 313--317. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brunhart-Lupo, N., Bush, B. W., Gruchalla, K., and Smith, S. Simulation exploration through immersive parallel planes. In Immersive Analytics (IA), 2016 Workshop on, IEEE (2016), 19--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bryson, S. Virtual reality in scientific visualization. Communications of the ACM 39, 5 (1996), 62--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chen, X., Self, J. Z., House, L., and North, C. Be the data: A new approach for lmmersive analytics. In Immersive Analytics (IA), 2016 Workshop on, IEEE (2016), 32--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hart, S. G. Nasa-task load index (nasa-tlx); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol. 50, Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2006), 904--908.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Inselberg, A. The plane with parallel coordinates. The visual computer 1, 2 (1985), 69--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jones, S. L., and Kelly, R. Finding "interesting" correlations in multi-faceted personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '16, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 3099--3106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Saraiya, P., North, C., and Duca, K. An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 11, 4 (2005), 443--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sylaiou, S., Mania, K., Karoulis, A., and White, M. Exploring the relationship between presence and enjoyment in a virtual museum. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 5 (2010), 243--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Van Dam, A., Forsberg, A. S., Laidlaw, D. H., LaViola, J. J., and Simpson, R. M. Immersive vr for scientific visualization: A progress report. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 20, 6 (2000), 26--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Data in Virtual Reality: Comparisons with 2D Data Visualizations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      3155 pages
      ISBN:9781450356213
      DOI:10.1145/3170427

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 April 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate1,208of3,955submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader