skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173705acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Pentelligence: Combining Pen Tip Motion and Writing Sounds for Handwritten Digit Recognition

Published:19 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital pens emit ink on paper and digitize handwriting. The range of the pen is typically limited to a special writing surface on which the pen's tip is tracked. We present Pentelligence, a pen for handwritten digit recognition that operates on regular paper and does not require a separate tracking device. It senses the pen tip's motions and sound emissions when stroking. Pen motions and writing sounds exhibit complementary properties. Combining both types of sensor data substantially improves the recognition rate. Hilbert envelopes of the writing sounds and mean-filtered motion data are fed to neural networks for majority voting. The results on a dataset of 9408 handwritten digits taken from 26 individuals show that motion+sound outperforms single-sensor approaches at an accuracy of 78.4% for 10 test users. Retraining the networks for a single writer on a dataset of 2120 samples increased the precision to 100% for single handwritten digits at an overall accuracy of 98.3%.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1870-file5.mp4

mp4

12.2 MB

pn1870.mp4

mp4

168.4 MB

References

  1. Anoto AB. 2016. Anoto. Digital pen and paper technology. (2016). http://www.anoto.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. E. Alpaydin. 1992. Multiple neural networks and weighted voting. In Proceedings., 11th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Vol.II. Conference B: Pattern Recognition Methodology and Systems. 29--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Toshifumi Arai, Dietmar Aust, and Scott E. Hudson. 1997. PaperLink: A Technique for Hyperlinking from Real Paper to Electronic Content. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '97). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 327--334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hiroki Asai and Hayato Yamana. 2013. Detecting Student Frustration Based on Handwriting Behavior. In Proceedings of the Adjunct Publication of the 26th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '13 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 77--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Won-Chul Bang, Wook Chang, Kyeong-Ho Kang, Eun-Seok Choi, Alexey Potanin, and Dong-Yoon Kim. 2003. Self-contained Spatial Input Device for Wearable Computers. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC '03). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 26--. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=946249.946869 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Muzaffar Bashir and Jürgen Kempf. 2008. Reduced Dynamic Time Warping for Handwriting Recognition Based on Multi dimensional Time Series of a Novel Pen Device. 3 (01 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Peter Brandl, Clifton Forlines, Daniel Wigdor, Michael Haller, and Chia Shen. 2008. Combining and Measuring the Benefits of Bimanual Pen and Direct-touch Interaction on Horizontal Interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 154--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Bunke, T. Von Siebenthal, T. Yamasaki, and M. Schenkel. 1999. Online handwriting data acquisition using a video camera. In Document Analysis and Recognition, 1999. ICDAR '99. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on. 573--576. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. François Chollet and others. 2015. Keras. https://github.com/fchollet/keras. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wacom Company. 2011. Wacom Inkling. (2011). http://inkling.wacom.eu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. d. Choi, A. S. Lee, and S. y. Lee. 2006. On-Line Handwritten Character Recognition with 3D Accelerometer. In 2006 IEEE International Conference on Information Acquisition. 845--850.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Chris Harrison and Scott E. Hudson. 2008. Scratch Input: Creating Large, Inexpensive, Unpowered and Mobile Finger Input Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 205--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sungjae Hwang, Andrea Bianchi, and Kwangyun Wohn. 2012. MicPen: Pressure-sensitive Pen Interaction Using Microphone with Standard Touchscreen. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1847--1852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Koichi Kise, Megumi Chikano, Kazumasa Iwata, Masakazu Iwamura, Seiichi Uchida, and Shinichiro Omachi. 2010. Expansion of Queries and Databases for Improving the Retrieval Accuracy of Document Portions: An Application to a Camera-pen System. In Proceedings of the 9th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 309--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Narayanan C. Krishnan, Colin Juillard, Dirk Colbry, and Sethuraman Panchanathan. 2009. Recognition of Hand Movements Using Wearable Accelerometers. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 1, 2 (April 2009), 143--155. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1735835.1735841 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. F. F. Li. 2004. Handwriting authentication by envelopes of sound signature. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004., Vol. 1. 401--404 Vol.1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wenzhe Li and Tracy Anne Hammond. 2011. Recognizing Text Through Sound Alone. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2011, San Francisco, California, USA, August 7--11, 2011. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ AAAI/AAAI11/paper/view/3791 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Cheng-Lin Liu, Kazuki Nakashima, Hiroshi Sako, and Hiromichi Fujisawa. 2003. Handwritten digit recognition: Benchmarking of state-of-the-art techniques. 36 (10 2003), 2271--2285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. Miura, S. Kunifuji, and Y. Sakamoto. 2007. AirTransNote: An Instant Note Sharing and Reproducing System to Support Students Learning. In Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007). 175--179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Tohru MIYAGAWA, Yoshimichi YONEZAWA, Kazunori Itoh, and Masami Hashimoto. 2002. Handwritten Pattern Reproduction Using 3D Inertial Measurement of Handwriting Movement. 38 (01 2002), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mario E. Munich and Pietro Perona. 2002. Visual Input for Pen-Based Computers. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 3 (March 2002), 313--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Shinji Nabeshima, Shinichirou Yamamoto, Kiyoshi Agusa, and Toshio Taguchi. 1995. MEMO-PEN: A New Input Device. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '95). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 256--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Osborne. 1980. An Introduction to Microcomputers: Basic concepts. Osborne/McGraw-Hill. https://books.google.de/books?id=ScAjAAAAMAAJ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Stan Salvador and Philip Chan. 2007. Toward Accurate Dynamic Time Warping in Linear Time and Space. Intell. Data Anal. 11, 5 (Oct. 2007), 561--580. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1367985.1367993 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Andrew Seniuk and Dorothea Blostein. 2009. Pen Acoustic Emissions for Text and Gesture Recognition. In Proceedings of the 2009 10th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR '09). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 872--876. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15 (2014), 1929--1958. http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/srivastava14a.html Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Jürgen Steimle, Iryna Gurevych, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2007. Notetaking in University Courses and its Implications for eLearning Systems. In DeLFI 2007: 5. e-Learning Fachtagung Informatik, Christian Eibl, Johannes Magenheim, Sigrid Schubert, and Martin Wessner (Eds.). Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn, 45--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jelena Ljucović Adis Balota Zoran ?evarac Tijana Vujičić, Tripo Matijević. 2016. Comparative Analysis of Methods for Determining Number of Hidden Neurons in Artificial Neural Network. Proceeding of the Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems 27 (2016), 219--223. http://archive.ceciis.foi.hr/app/index.php/ceciis/ index/pages/view/ProceedingsArchive2016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Jeen-Shing Wang and Fang-Chen Chuang. 2012. An Accelerometer-Based Digital Pen With a Trajectory Recognition Algorithm for Handwritten Digit and Gesture Recognition. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics 59, 7 (2012), 2998--3007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Daniel Wigdor, Clifton Forlines, Patrick Baudisch, John Barnwell, and Chia Shen. 2007. Lucid Touch: A See-through Mobile Device. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 269--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Myrna S. Zamarripa, Victor M. Gonzalez, and Jesus Favela. 2007. The Augmented Patient Chart: Seamless Integration of Physical and Digital Artifacts for Hospital Work. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-computer Interaction: Applications and Services (UAHCI'07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1006--1015. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1757148.1757261 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Bin Zhang, Sargur N. Srihari, and Sangjik Lee. 2003. Individuality of Handwritten Characters. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition - Volume 2 (ICDAR '03). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1086--. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=938980.939484 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Pentelligence: Combining Pen Tip Motion and Writing Sounds for Handwritten Digit Recognition

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader