skip to main content
10.1145/3184558.3188729acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Detect Rumor and Stance Jointly by Neural Multi-task Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, an unhealthy phenomenon characterized as the massive spread of fake news or unverified information (i.e., rumors) has become increasingly a daunting issue in human society. The rumors commonly originate from social media outlets, primarily microblogging platforms, being viral afterwards by the wild, willful propagation via a large number of participants. It is observed that rumorous posts often trigger versatile, mostly controversial stances among participating users. Thus, determining the stances on the posts in question can be pertinent to the successful detection of rumors, and vice versa. Existing studies, however, mainly regard rumor detection and stance classification as separate tasks. In this paper, we argue that they should be treated as a joint, collaborative effort, considering the strong connections between the veracity of claim and the stances expressed in responsive posts. Enlightened by the multi-task learning scheme, we propose a joint framework that unifies the two highly pertinent tasks, i.e., rumor detection and stance classification. Based on deep neural networks, we train both tasks jointly using weight sharing to extract the common and task-invariant features while each task can still learn its task-specific features. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets gathered from Twitter and news portals demonstrate that our proposed framework improves both rumor detection and stance classification tasks consistently with the help of the strong inter-task connections, achieving much better performance than state-of-the-art methods.

References

  1. Rob Abbott, Marilyn Walker, Pranav Anand, Jean E Fox Tree, Robeson Bowmani, and Joseph King. 2011. How can you say such things!: Recognizing disagreement in informal political argument Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rie Kubota Ando and Tong Zhang. 2005. A framework for learning predictive structures from multiple tasks and unlabeled data. Journal of Machine Learning Research Vol. 6, Nov (2005), 1817--1853. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Isabelle Augenstein, Tim Rockt"aschel, Andreas Vlachos, and Kalina Bontcheva. 2016. Stance detection with bidirectional conditional encoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05464 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernd Bohnet and Joakim Nivre. 2012. A transition-based system for joint part-of-speech tagging and labeled non-projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1455--1465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Rich Caruana. 1998. Multitask learning. Learning to learn. Springer, 95--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza, and Barbara Poblete. 2011. Information credibility on twitter. In Proceedings of WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yi-Chin Chen, Zhao-Yang Liu, and Hung-Yu Kao. 2017. IKM at SemEval-2017 Task 8: Convolutional Neural Networks for stance detection and rumor verification. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017). 465--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kyunghyun Cho, Bart van Merriënboer, Dzmitry Bahdanau, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. On the properties of neural machine translation: Encoder-decoder approaches. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1259 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ju-han Chuang and Shukai Hsieh. 2015. Stance classification on ptt comments. In Proceedings of the 29th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ronan Collobert and Jason Weston. 2008. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning. ACM, 160--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ronan Collobert, Jason Weston, Léon Bottou, Michael Karlen, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Pavel Kuksa. 2011. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. Journal of Machine Learning Research Vol. 12, Aug (2011), 2493--2537. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nicholas DiFonzo and Prashant Bordia. 2007. Rumor, gossip and urban legends. Diogenes, Vol. 54, 1 (2007), 19--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Daxiang Dong, Hua Wu, Wei He, Dianhai Yu, and Haifeng Wang. 2015. Multi-Task Learning for Multiple Language Translation. ACL (1). 1723--1732.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pamela Donovan. 2007. How idle is idle talk One hundred years of rumor research. Diogenes, Vol. 54, 1 (2007), 59--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. John Duchi, Elad Hazan, and Yoram Singer. 2011. Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research Vol. 12, Jul (2011), 2121--2159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Orhan Firat, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2016. Multi-Way, Multilingual Neural Machine Translation with a Shared Attention Mechanism Proceedings of NAACL-HLT. 866--875.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Adrien Friggeri, Lada A Adamic, Dean Eckles, and Justin Cheng. 2014. Rumor cascades Proceedings of ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sardar Hamidian and Mona Diab. 2015. Rumor detection and classification for twitter data The Fifth International Conference on Social Media Technologies, Communication, and Informatics, SOTICS, IARIA. 71--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Aniko Hannak, Drew Margolin, Brian Keegan, and Ingmar Weber. 2014. Get Back! You Don't Know Me Like That: The Social Mediation of Fact Checking Interventions in Twitter Conversations. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jun Hatori, Takuya Matsuzaki, Yusuke Miyao, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2012. Incremental joint approach to word segmentation, POS tagging, and dependency parsing in Chinese Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers-Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguistics, 1045--1053. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, Vol. 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Elena Kochkina, Maria Liakata, and Isabelle Augenstein. 2017. Turing at SemEval-2017 Task 8: Sequential Approach to Rumour Stance Classification with Branch-LSTM. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.07221 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sejeong Kwon, Meeyoung Cha, and Kyomin Jung. 2017. Rumor Detection over Varying Time Windows. PLOS ONE, Vol. 12, 1 (2017), e0168344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Sejeong Kwon, Meeyoung Cha, Kyomin Jung, Wei Chen, and Yajun Wang. 2013. Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media Proceedings of ICDM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhenghua Li, Min Zhang, Wanxiang Che, Ting Liu, and Wenliang Chen. 2014. Joint optimization for Chinese pos tagging and dependency parsing. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, Vol. 22, 1 (2014), 274--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pengfei Liu, Xipeng Qiu, and Xuanjing Huang. 2016. Recurrent neural network for text classification with multi-task learning Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 2873--2879. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong He, Li Deng, Kevin Duh, and Ye-Yi Wang. 2015 a. Representation Learning Using Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Semantic Classification and Information Retrieval. In HLT-NAACL. 912--921.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Xiaomo Liu, Armineh Nourbakhsh, Quanzhi Li, Rui Fang, and Sameena Shah. 2015 b. Real-time Rumor Debunking on Twitter. In Proceedings of CIKM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Michal Lukasik, Trevor Cohn, and Kalina Bontcheva. 2015. Classifying tweet level judgements of rumours in social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00468 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Michal Lukasik, PK Srijith, Duy Vu, Kalina Bontcheva, Arkaitz Zubiaga, and Trevor Cohn. 2016. Hawkes processes for continuous time sequence classification: an application to rumour stance classification in twitter. Proceedings of 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 393--398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V Le, Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Lukasz Kaiser. 2015. Multi-task sequence to sequence learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06114 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jing Ma, Wei Gao, Prasenjit Mitra, Sejeong Kwon, Bernard J Jansen, Kam-Fai Wong, and Meeyoung Cha. 2016. Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks Proceedings of IJCAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Jing Ma, Wei Gao, Zhongyu Wei, Yueming Lu, and Kam-Fai Wong. 2015. Detect Rumors Using Time Series of Social Context Information on Microblogging Websites Proceedings of CIKM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Jing Ma, Wei Gao, and Kam-Fai Wong. 2017. Detect Rumors in Microblog Posts Using Propagation Structure via Kernel Learning Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Vol. Vol. 1. 708--717.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Marcelo Mendoza, Barbara Poblete, and Carlos Castillo. 2010. Twitter Under Crisis: Can we trust what we RT. In Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics. ACM, 71--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Saif Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Parinaz Sobhani, Xiao-Dan Zhu, and Colin Cherry. 2016. SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets. SemEval@ NAACL-HLT. 31--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Meredith Ringel Morris, Scott Counts, Asta Roseway, Aaron Hoff, and Julia Schwarz. 2012. Tweeting is believing: understanding microblog credibility perceptions Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 441--450. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Vahed Qazvinian, Emily Rosengren, Dragomir R Radev, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2011. Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs Proceedings of EMNLP. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Sarvesh Ranade, Rajeev Sangal, and Radhika Mamidi. 2013. Stance Classification in Online Debates by Recognizing Users' Intentions. SIGDIAL Conference. 61--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Bhavtosh Rath, Wei Gao, Jing Ma, and Jaideep Srivastava. 2015. From Retweet to Believability: Utilizing Trust to Identify Rumor Spreaders on Twitter Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on. IEEE, 179--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Sara Rosenthal and Kathy McKeown. 2015. I Couldn't Agree More: The Role of Conversational Structure in Agreement and Disagreement Detection in Online Discussions. In SIGDIAL Conference. 168--177.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Ralph L Rosnow. 1991. Inside rumor: A personal journey. American Psychologist Vol. 46, 5 (1991), 484.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Prashanth Vijayaraghavan, Ivan Sysoev, Soroush Vosoughi, and Deb Roy. 2016. Deepstance at semeval-2016 task 6: Detecting stance in tweets using character and word-level cnns. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05694 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Ke Wu, Song Yang, and Kenny Q Zhu. 2015. False rumors detection on sina weibo by propagation structures Proceedings of ICDE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Fan Yang, Yang Liu, Xiaohui Yu, and Min Yang. 2012. Automatic detection of rumor on sina weibo. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Mining Data Semantics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Li Zeng, Kate Starbird, and Emma S Spiro. 2016. # Unconfirmed: Classifying Rumor Stance in Crisis-Related Social Media Messages Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhe Zhao, Paul Resnick, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2015. Enquiring Minds: Early Detection of Rumors in Social Media from Enquiry Posts Proceedings of WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Arkaitz Zubiaga, Elena Kochkina, Maria Liakata, Rob Procter, and Michal Lukasik. 2016 a. Stance classification in rumours as a sequential task exploiting the tree structure of social media conversations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.09028 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Arkaitz Zubiaga, Maria Liakata, Rob Procter, Geraldine Wong Sak Hoi, and Peter Tolmie. 2016 b. Analysing how people orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at conversational threads. PloS one, Vol. 11, 3 (2016), e0150989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Detect Rumor and Stance Jointly by Neural Multi-task Learning

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WWW '18: Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018
          April 2018
          2023 pages
          ISBN:9781450356404

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

          Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

          Publication History

          • Published: 23 April 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format