skip to main content
10.1145/3208833.3208852acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicsrtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analysis of wake vortex spacing reduction technology

Authors Info & Claims
Published:16 March 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

There are two main purposes for our research on wake vortex: one is to improve operation safety, the other is to reduce the wake spacing and ensure the runway capacity and operation efficiency under the premise of ensuring safety. By comparing and analyzing the technology of wake spacing reduction, we have studied aerial classification technology, synchronous offset approach technology, high glide slope approach technology, wake vortex warning system, aircraft wake vortex interval system and so on. Research shows that by proposing advanced concepts or improving the ATM program, namely the wake interval reduction technology, we can avoid the influence of the wake generated by the front aircraft, ensure the operation safety and increase the airport capacity by 3.7%-25%. The key technology of the wake interval reduction technology is the wake vortex prediction model and the safety analysis of the wake encounter. However, the higher the accuracy of the model is, the more complex the computation is. The research on wake detection technology will be the future development direction.

References

  1. Holzäpfel F., Tchipev N., Stephan A.2015. Wind Impact on Single Vortices and Counterrotating Vortex Pairs in Ground Proximity{J}.Flow Turbulence & Combustion, 2015:1--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bricteux F., Duponcheel M., Visscher ID. 2016. Winckelmans G. LES investigation of the transport and decay of various-strengths wake vortices in ground effect and subjected to a turbulent crosswind {J}. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28 (6): 107--138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hinton D A,Charnock H K,Bagwell D R.Design of an aircraft vortex spacing system for airport capacity improvement{R}.AIAA-2000-0622, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Holzpfel F,Frech M,Gerz T,etal. 2009. Aircraft wake vortex scenarios simulation package-wake scense {J}.Aerospace Science & Technology, 2009,13(1):1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Holzäpfel F., Steen M.: Aircraft wake-vortex evolution in ground proximity: Analysis and parameterization, 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, 9-12 Jan 2006, AIAA 2006--1077.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hefusheng. 2005. Wingtip vortex on the back of aircraft flight safety and safety measures {J}. Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2005,16(1):14--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Panweijun, lijiayu. 2007. Flight separation research based on aircraft wake.{J}. Applied Mechanics and Materials.2012.12,2201--2207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yanyu, Zhudaiwu, Zhangqing.2016. Study on wake interval of cross runway.{J}.China Science And Technology Information, 2016, (7):43--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhao Hong-sheng, Xu Xiao-hao. 2008. Improved Algorithm of Dynamic Prediction of Wake Vortex Dissipation{J}. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China,2008, 26(1):4--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. ICAO, Air regulations and air traffic services; Air Traffic Management Bureau of CAAC;2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Federal Aviation Administration. SAFO12007.Re-categorization (RECAT) of FAA Wake Turbulence Separation Categories At Specific Airports {S}.Washington,DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Colin Cutler. FAA Allows Jets To Fly Closer Together With New' RECAT' Rules {EB /OL}. https: / /www.boldmethod.com /blog /article /2015 /01 /faa- new- wake- turbulence- recategorization-rules /.01 /15 /2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. FAA. Aeronautical Information Manual: Offcial guide to basic fight information and ATC procedures {R}.Washington DC,USA: Federal Aviation dministration,2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Huhnold M, kulikow A, Haugg E,etal. 2006. Realtime simulation studies concerning the operational aspects of two landing thresholds on one runway at Frankfurt {C}. Proceedings of the25th International Congress on the Aeronautical Sciences, Hamburg, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Konopka J., Fischer H. 2005. The wake vortex warning system at Frankfurt airport {C}. Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gurke T, Lafferton H. 1997. The development of the wake vortex warning system for Frankfurt airport:theory and implementation {J}. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 1997,5(1):3--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hinton D A, Charnock J K, Bagwell D R, etal.1999. NASA aircraft vortex spacing system development status {R}.AIAA-1999-753, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Roux L C, Corjon A.1997. Wake vortex advisory system implementation at Orly airport for departing aircraft {J}.Air Traffic Control Quarterly,1997,5(1):31--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Koepp F.. Doppler lidar investigation of wake vortex transport between closely spaced parallel runways {J}.Aiaa Journal, 2015, 32 (4): 805--810.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Greene G C.An approximate model of vortex decay{J}.Journal of Aircraft,1986,23(7):566--573.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Visscher I D, Lonfils T, Winckelmans G. 2013. Fast-Time Modeling of Ground Effects on Wake Vortex Transport and Decay{J}. Journal of Aircraft,2013,50(5):1514--1525.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Luckner R. Höhne G, Fuhrmann M. 2004. Hazard criteria for wake vortex encounters during approach{J}. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2004,8(8):673--687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Höhne G, Fuhrmann M, Luckner R.Critical wake vortex encounter scenarios {J}. Aerospace Science & Technology, 2004, 8(8):689--701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Rafi M, Steck JE. 2013. Response and Recovery of an MRAC Advanced Flight Control System to Wake Vortex Encounters{J}. AIAA Infotech, 2013,4(7):266--273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Analysis of wake vortex spacing reduction technology

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICSRT '18: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Service Robotics Technologies
      March 2018
      98 pages
      ISBN:9781450364348
      DOI:10.1145/3208833

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 March 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader