skip to main content
10.1145/3219819.3219920acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Where Will Dockless Shared Bikes be Stacked?: --- Parking Hotspots Detection in a New City

Published:19 July 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Dockless shared bikes, which aim at providing a more flexible and convenient solution to the first-and-last mile connection, come into China and expand to other countries at a very impressing speed. The expansion of shared bike business in new cities brings many challenges among which, the most critical one is the parking chaos caused by too many bikes yet insufficient demands. To allow possible actions to be taken in advance, this paper studies the problem of detecting parking hotspots in a new city where no dockless shared bike has been deployed. We propose to measure road hotness by bike density with the help of the Kernal Density Estimation. We extract useful features from multi-source urban data and introduce a novel domain adaption network for transferring hotspots knowledge learned from one city with shared bikes to a new city. The extensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach compared with various baselines.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

liu_dockless_shared_bikes.mp4

mp4

452 MB

References

  1. Jie Bao, Tianfu He, Sijie Ruan, Yanhua Li, and Yu Zheng . 2017. Planning Bike Lanes based on Sharing-Bikes' Trajectories. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Glen Van Brummelen . 2012. Heavenly Mathematics:The Forgotten Art of Spherical Trigonometry. Princeton University Press. 1--2 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chris Burges, Tal Shaked, Erin Renshaw, Ari Lazier, Matt Deeds, Nicole Hamilton, and Greg Hullender . 2005. Learning to rank using gradient descent. In Proceedings of the 22nd ICML. ACM, 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Christopher JC Burges . 2010. From ranknet to lambdarank to lambdamart: An overview. Learning, Vol. 11, 23--581 (2010), 81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Christopher J Burges, Robert Ragno, and Quoc V Le . 2007. Learning to rank with nonsmooth cost functions. In NIPS. 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Zhangjie Cao, Mingsheng Long, Jianmin Wang, and Michael I Jordan . 2017. Partial Transfer Learning with Selective Adversarial Networks. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ronan Collobert, Jason Weston, Léon Bottou, Michael Karlen, Koray Kavukcuoglu, and Pavel Kuksa . 2011. Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. Journal of Machine Learning Research Vol. 12, Aug (2011), 2493--2537. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Martin Ester, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Jörg Sander, Xiaowei Xu, et almbox. . 1996. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. KDD, Vol. Vol. 96. 226--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yaroslav Ganin and Victor Lempitsky . 2015. Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation. International Conference on Machine Learning. 1180--1189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Yaroslav Ganin, Evgeniya Ustinova, Hana Ajakan, Pascal Germain, Hugo Larochelle, Franccois Laviolette, Mario Marchand, and Victor Lempitsky . 2016. Domain-adversarial training of neural networks. Journal of Machine Learning Research Vol. 17, 59 (2016), 1--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nicolas Gast, Guillaume Massonnet, Daniël Reijsbergen, and Mirco Tribastone . 2015. Probabilistic forecasts of bike-sharing systems for journey planning Proceedings of the 24th CIKM. ACM, 703--712. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio . 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 2672--2680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. G. E. Hinton . 2008. Visualizing High-Dimensional Data Using t-SNE. Vigiliae Christianae, Vol. 9, 2 (2008), 2579--2605.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Minh X Hoang, Yu Zheng, and Ambuj K Singh . 2016. FCCF: forecasting citywide crowd flows based on big data Proceedings of the 24th SIGSPATIAL. ACM, 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Judy Hoffman, Sergio Guadarrama, Eric S Tzeng, Ronghang Hu, Jeff Donahue, Ross Girshick, Trevor Darrell, and Kate Saenko . 2014. LSDA: Large scale detection through adaptation. In NIPS. 3536--3544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sergey Ioffe and Christian Szegedy . 2015. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift ICML. 448--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Neal Jean, Marshall Burke, Michael Xie, W Matthew Davis, David B Lobell, and Stefano Ermon . 2016. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science, Vol. 353, 6301 (2016), 790--794.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. KhosrowDehnad . 2012. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Technometrics, Vol. 29, 4 (2012), 495--495.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba . 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Min Lin, Qiang Chen, and Shuicheng Yan . 2013. Network In Network. Computer Science (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Junming Liu, Qiao Li, Meng Qu, Weiwei Chen, Jingyuan Yang, Hui Xiong, Hao Zhong, and Yanjie Fu . 2015. Station site optimization in bike sharing systems. Data Mining (ICDM), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 883--888. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Junming Liu, Leilei Sun, Weiwei Chen, and Hui Xiong . 2016. Rebalancing Bike Sharing Systems: A Multi-source Data Smart Optimization Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD. ACM, 1005--1014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mingsheng Long, Yue Cao, Jianmin Wang, and Michael Jordan . 2015. Learning transferable features with deep adaptation networks ICML. 97--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mingsheng Long, Han Zhu, Jianmin Wang, and Michael I Jordan . 2016. Unsupervised domain adaptation with residual transfer networks NIPS. 136--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Christopher D Manning, Prabhakar Raghavan, Hinrich Schütze, et almbox. . 2008. Introduction to information retrieval. Vol. Vol. 1. Cambridge university press Cambridge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Luis M Martinez, Lu'ıs Caetano, Tomás Eiró, and Francisco Cruz . 2012. An optimisation algorithm to establish the location of stations of a mixed fleet biking system: an application to the city of Lisbon. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 54 (2012), 513--524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Sinno Jialin Pan, James T Kwok, and Qiang Yang . 2008. Transfer Learning via Dimensionality Reduction.. AAAI, Vol. Vol. 8. 677--682. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sinno Jialin Pan, Ivor W. Tsang, James T. Kwok, and Qiang Yang . 2011. Domain Adaptation via Transfer Component Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks Vol. 22, 2 (2011), 199--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang . 2010. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, Vol. 22, 10 (2010), 1345--1359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. David Sculley . 2010. Combined regression and ranking. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD. ACM, 979--988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Simon J Sheather and Michael C Jones . 1991. A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) (1991), 683--690.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Adish Singla, Marco Santoni, Gábor Bartók, Pratik Mukerji, Moritz Meenen, and Andreas Krause . 2015. Incentivizing Users for Balancing Bike Sharing Systems. AAAI. 723--729. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Alex Smola, Arthur Gretton, Le Song, and Bernhard Schölkopf . 2007. A Hilbert space embedding for distributions. In International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory. Springer, 13--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov . 2014. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research Vol. 15, 1 (2014), 1929--1958. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Michelle Toh . 2017. China's bike-sharing companies have hit a roadblock. http://money.cnn.com/2017/12/29/investing/china-bike-sharing-boom-bust/index.html?from=timeline. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Eric Tzeng, Judy Hoffman, Ning Zhang, Kate Saenko, and Trevor Darrell . 2014. Deep domain confusion: Maximizing for domain invariance. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Zidong Yang, Ji Hu, Yuanchao Shu, Peng Cheng, Jiming Chen, and Thomas Moscibroda . 2016. Mobility Modeling and Prediction in Bike-Sharing Systems Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, 165--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ming Zeng, Tong Yu, Xiao Wang, Vincent Su, Le T Nguyen, et almbox. . 2016. Improving Demand Prediction in Bike Sharing System by Learning Global Features. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Where Will Dockless Shared Bikes be Stacked?: --- Parking Hotspots Detection in a New City

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          KDD '18: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
          July 2018
          2925 pages
          ISBN:9781450355520
          DOI:10.1145/3219819

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 July 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          KDD '18 Paper Acceptance Rate107of983submissions,11%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader