Zachary C. Lipton
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Supervised machine-learning models boast remarkable predictive capabilities. But can you trust your model? Will it work in deployment? What else can it tell you about the world?
- Athey, S., Imbens, G. W. 2015 Machine-learning methods https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.01132v1 (see also ref. 7).Google Scholar
- Caruana, R., Kangarloo, H., Dionisio, J. D, Sinha, U., Johnson, D. 1999. Case-based explanation of non-case- based learning methods. In Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Symposium: 212-215.Google Scholar
- Caruana, R., Lou, Y., Gehrke, J., Koch, P., Sturm, M., Elhadad, N. 2015. Intelligible models for healthcare: Predicting pneumonia risk and hospital 30-day readmission. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1721-1730. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chang, J., Gerrish, S., Wang, C., Boyd-Graber, J. L., Blei, D. M. 2009. Reading tea leaves: how humans interpret topic models. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 288-296. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Doshi-Velez, F., Wallace, B., Adams, R. 2015. Graph- sparse lDA: a topic model with structured sparsity. In Proceedings of the 29th Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Conference, 2575-2581. Google ScholarDigital Library
- FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation). 2011. Introduction to model builder scorecard; http://www.fico.com/en/latest-thinking/white-papers/introduction-to-model-builder-scorecard.Google Scholar
- Goodman, B., Flaxman, S. 2016. European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation." https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08813v3.Google Scholar
- Huysmans, J., Dejaeger, K., Mues, C., Vanthienen, J., Baesens, B. 2011. An empirical evaluation of the comprehensibility of decision table, tree- and rule- based predictive models. Journal of Decision Support Systems 51(1), 141-154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, B. 2015. Interactive and interpretable machine- learning models for human-machine collaboration. Ph.D. thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Kim, B., Rudin, C., Shah, J. A. 2014. The Bayesian case model: A generative approach for case-based reasoning and prototype classification. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), volume 2, 1952-1960. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim, B., Glassman, E., Johnson, B., Shah, J. 2015. iBCM: Interactive Bayesian case model empowering humans via intuitive interaction. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Krening, S., Harrison, B., Feigh, K., Isbell, C., Riedl, M., Thomaz, A. 2017. Learning from explanations using sentiment and advice in RL. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems 9(1), 41-55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lipton, Z. C., Kale, D. C., Wetzel, R. 2016. Modeling missing data in clinical time series with RNNs. In Proceedings of Machine Learning for Healthcare.Google Scholar
- Liu, C., Rani, P., Sarkar, N. 2006. An empirical study of machine-learning techniques for affect recognition in human-robot interaction. Pattern Analysis and Applications 9(1): 58-69. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lou, Y., Caruana, R., Gehrke, J. 2012. Intelligible models for classification and regression. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 150-158. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lou, Y., Caruana, R., Gehrke, J., Hooker, G. 2013. Accurate intelligible models with pairwise interactions. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 623-631. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mahendran, A., Vedaldi, A. 2015. Understanding deep image representations by inverting them. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1-9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McAuley, J., Leskovec, J. 2013. Hidden factors and hidden topics: understanding rating dimensions with review text. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 165-172. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., Dean, J. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), volume 2, 3111?3119. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mordvintsev, A., Olah, C., Tyka, M. 2015. Inceptionism: going deeper into neural networks. Google AI Blog; https://ai.googleblog.com/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html.Google Scholar
- Mounk, Y. 2014. Is Harvard unfair to Asian-Americans? New York Times (Nov. 24); http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/25/opinion/is-harvard-unfair-to-asian-americans.html.Google Scholar
- Pearl, J. 2009. Causality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C. 2016. "Why should I trust you?": explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135-1144. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ridgeway, G., Madigan, D., Richardson, T., O'Kane, J. 1998. Interpretable boosted naïve Bayes classification. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: 101-104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., Zisserman, A. 2013. Deep inside convolutional networks: Visualising image classification models and saliency maps. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6034 (see notes to refs 1, 7).Google Scholar
- Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., Fergus, R. 2013. Intriguing properties of neural networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199 (see refs 1, 7, 25).Google Scholar
- Tibshirani, R. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 58(1), 267-288.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Van der Maaten, L., Hinton, G. 2008. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 2579-2605.Google Scholar
- Wang, H.-X., Fratiglioni, L., Frisoni, G. B., Viitanen, M., Winblad, B. 1999. Smoking and the occurrence of Alzheimer's disease: cross-sectional and longitudinal data in a population-based study. American Journal of Epidemiology 149(7), 640-644.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, Z., Freitas, N., Lanctot, M. 2016. Dueling network architectures for deep reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning 48, 1995-2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Explainable AI in Industry
KDD '19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data MiningArtificial Intelligence is increasingly playing an integral role in determining our day-to-day experiences. Moreover, with proliferation of AI based solutions in areas such as hiring, lending, criminal justice, healthcare, and education, the resulting ...
Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAdvances in artificial intelligence (AI) frame opportunities and challenges for user interface design. Principles for human-AI interaction have been discussed in the human-computer interaction community for over two decades, but more study and ...
Explainability fact sheets: a framework for systematic assessment of explainable approaches
FAT* '20: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and TransparencyExplanations in Machine Learning come in many forms, but a consensus regarding their desired properties is yet to emerge. In this paper we introduce a taxonomy and a set of descriptors that can be used to characterise and systematically assess ...
Comments