skip to main content
10.1145/3242969.3243001acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using Interlocutor-Modulated Attention BLSTM to Predict Personality Traits in Small Group Interaction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Small group interaction occurs often in workplace and education settings. Its dynamic progression is an essential factor in dictating the final group performance outcomes. The personality of each individual within the group is reflected in his/her interpersonal behaviors with other members of the group as they engage in these task-oriented interactions. In this work, we propose an interlocutor-modulated attention BSLTM (IM-aBLSTM) architecture that models an individual's vocal behaviors during small group interactions in order to automatically infer his/her personality traits. The interlocutor-modulated attention mechanism jointly optimize the relevant interpersonal vocal behaviors of other members of group during interactions. In specifics, we evaluate our proposed IM-aBLSTM in one of the largest small group interaction database, the ELEA corpus. Our framework achieves a promising unweighted recall accuracy of 87.9% in ten different binary personality trait prediction tasks, which outperforms the best results previously reported on the same database by 10.4% absolute. Finally, by analyzing the interpersonal vocal behaviors in the region of high attention weights, we observe several distinct intra- and inter-personal vocal behavior patterns that vary as a function of personality traits.

References

  1. Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio . 2014. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cigdem Beyan, Francesca Capozzi, Cristina Becchio, and Vittorio Murino . 2018. Prediction of the Leadership Style of an Emergent Leader Using Audio and Visual Nonverbal Features. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia Vol. 20, 2 (2018), 441--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P Boersma and D Weenink . 2003. Praat-A system for doing phonetics by computer {Computer Software}. The Netherlands: Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jean Carletta, Simone Ashby, Sebastien Bourban, Mike Flynn, Mael Guillemot, Thomas Hain, Jaroslav Kadlec, Vasilis Karaiskos, Wessel Kraaij, Melissa Kronenthal, et almbox. . 2005. The AMI meeting corpus: A pre-announcement. In International Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction. Springer, 28--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Oya Celiktutan and Hatice Gunes . 2017. Automatic prediction of impressions in time and across varying context: Personality, attractiveness and likeability. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing Vol. 8, 1 (2017), 29--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lei Chen, R Travis Rose, Ying Qiao, Irene Kimbara, Fey Parrill, Haleema Welji, Tony Xu Han, Jilin Tu, Zhongqiang Huang, Mary Harper, et almbox. . 2005. VACE multimodal meeting corpus. In International Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction. Springer, 40--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Walter H Crockett . 1955. Emergent leadership in small, decision-making groups. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology Vol. 51, 3 (1955), 378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Michael R Cunningham . 1977. Personality and the structure of the nonverbal communication of emotion. Journal of Personality Vol. 45, 4 (1977), 564--584.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Sheng Fang, Catherine Achard, and Séverine Dubuisson . 2016. Personality classification and behaviour interpretation: An approach based on feature categories. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ACM, 225--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Howard S Friedman, M Robin DiMatteo, and Angelo Taranta . 1980. A study of the relationship between individual differences in nonverbal expressiveness and factors of personality and social interaction. Journal of Research in Personality Vol. 14, 3 (1980), 351--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Daniel Gatica-Perez, Oya Aran, and Dinesh Jayagopi . 2017. Analysis of Small Groups. Cambridge University Press, 349--367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. James Gibson, Dogan Can, Panayiotis Georgiou, David C Atkins, and Shrikanth S Narayanan . 2017. Attention networks for modeling behaviors in addiction counseling Proc. Interspeech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis R Goldberg . 1990. An alternative" description of personality": the big-five factor structure. Journal of personality and social psychology Vol. 59, 6 (1990), 1216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Alex Graves and Jürgen Schmidhuber . 2005. Framewise phoneme classification with bidirectional LSTM and other neural network architectures. Neural Networks Vol. 18, 5--6 (2005), 602--610. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J Richard Hackman and Charles G Morris . 1975. Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration1. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. Vol. 8. Elsevier, 45--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber . 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation Vol. 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Shan-Wen Hsiao, Hung-Ching Sun, Ming-Chuan Hsieh, Ming-Hsueh Tsai, Yu Tsao, and Chi-Chun Lee . 2017. Toward Automating Oral Presentation Scoring during Principal Certification Program using Audio-video Low-level Behavior Profiles. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dinesh Babu Jayagopi, Hayley Hung, Chuohao Yeo, and Daniel Gatica-Perez . 2009. Modeling dominance in group conversations using nonverbal activity cues. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing Vol. 17, 3 (2009), 501--513.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Heysem Kaya, Alexey A Karpov, and Albert Ali Salah . 2015. Fisher vectors with cascaded normalization for paralinguistic analysis Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba . 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Yun-Shao Lin and Chi-Chun Lee . 2017. Deriving Dyad-Level Interaction Representation using Interlocutors Structural and Expressive Multimodal Behavior Features. Proc. Interspeech 2017 (2017), 2366--2370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Joseph Edward McGrath . 1964. Social psychology: A brief introduction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Joseph Edward McGrath . 1984. Groups: Interaction and performance. Vol. Vol. 14. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Seyedmahdad Mirsamadi, Emad Barsoum, and Cha Zhang . 2017. Automatic speech emotion recognition using recurrent neural networks with local attention. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2017 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2227--2231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Shogo Okada, Oya Aran, and Daniel Gatica-Perez . 2015. Personality trait classification via co-occurrent multiparty multimodal event discovery. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ACM, 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Fabio Pianesi, Massimo Zancanaro, Bruno Lepri, and Alessandro Cappelletti . 2007. A multimodal annotated corpus of consensus decision making meetings. Language Resources and Evaluation Vol. 41, 3--4 (2007), 409--429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Jurgen Ruesch, Weldon Kees, Robert Goodloe Harper, Robert G Harper, Arthur N Wiens, and Joseph D Matarazzo . 1978. Nonverbal Communication: The State of the Art. Vol. Vol. 65. Univ of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jorge Sánchez, Florent Perronnin, Thomas Mensink, and Jakob Verbeek . 2013. Image classification with the fisher vector: Theory and practice. International journal of computer vision Vol. 105, 3 (2013), 222--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Dairazalia Sanchez-Cortes, Oya Aran, Marianne Schmid Mast, and Daniel Gatica-Perez . 2012. A nonverbal behavior approach to identify emergent leaders in small groups. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia Vol. 14, 3 (2012), 816--832. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Barry Schwartz, Abraham Tesser, and Evan Powell . 1982. Dominance cues in nonverbal behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly (1982), 114--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Shikhar Sharma, Ryan Kiros, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov . 2015. Action recognition using visual attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.04119 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. R Timothy Stein . 1975. Identifying emergent leaders from verbal and nonverbal communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Vol. 32, 1 (1975), 125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Alessandro Vinciarelli, Maja Pantic, and Hervé Bourlard . 2009. Social signal processing: Survey of an emerging domain. Image and vision computing Vol. 27, 12 (2009), 1743--1759. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Noreen M Webb . 1982. Student interaction and learning in small groups. Review of Educational research Vol. 52, 3 (1982), 421--445.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using Interlocutor-Modulated Attention BLSTM to Predict Personality Traits in Small Group Interaction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICMI '18: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
        October 2018
        687 pages
        ISBN:9781450356923
        DOI:10.1145/3242969

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 October 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ICMI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate63of149submissions,42%Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader