skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300517acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

The Right to the Sustainable Smart City

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Environmental concerns have driven an interest in sustainable smart cities, through the monitoring and optimisation of networked infrastructures. At the same time, there are concerns about who these interventions and services are for, and who benefits. HCI researchers and designers interested in civic life have started to call for the democratisation of urban space through resistance and political action to challenge state and corporate claims. This paper contributes to an emerging body of work that seeks to involve citizens in the design of sustainable smart cities, particularly in the context of marginalised and culturally diverse urban communities. We present a study involving co-designing Internet of Things with urban agricultural communities and discuss three ways in which design can participate in the right to the sustainable smart city through designing for the commons, care, and biocultural diversity.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper287.mp4

mp4

263.1 MB

References

  1. Samuel Alexander. 2015. Prosperous descent: Crisis as opportunity in an age of limits. Simplicity Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Panayotis Antoniadis, Ileana Apostol, Mark Gaved, Michael Smyth, and Andreas Unteidig. 2015. DIY networking as a facilitator for interdisciplinary research on the hybrid city. Hybrid Cities 2015 Data to People (2015), 65--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aline Baggio. 2005. Wireless sensor networks in precision agriculture. In ACM Workshop on RealWorld Wireless Sensor Networks (REALWSN 2005), Stockholm, Sweden, 1567--1576.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Corelia Baibarac and Doina Petrescu. 2017. Codesign and urban resilience: visioning tools for commoning resilience practices. CoDesign 0882, December (2017), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Karen S Baker and Helena Karasti. 2018. Data Care and Its Politics: Designing for Local Collective Data Management As a Neglected Thing. Proc. 15th Particip. Des. Conf. Full Pap. - Vol. 1 (2018), 10:1--10:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mara Balestrini, Yvonne Rogers, Carolyn Hassan, Javi Creus, Martha King, and Paul Marshall. 2017. A City in Common: A Framework to Orchestrate Large-scale Citizen Engagement Around Urban Issues. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 2282--2294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jeremy Brice. 2014. Killing in More-than-human Spaces?: Pasteurisation, Fungi, and the Metabolic Lives of Wine. 4, (2014), 171--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hronn Brynjarsdottir, Maria Håkansson, James Pierce, Eric Baumer, Carl DiSalvo, and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Sustainably unpersuaded: How Persuasion Narrows Our Vision of Sustainability. Proc. 2012 ACM Annu. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - CHI '12 (2012), 947. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Igor Calzada, Cristobal Cobo, Igor Calzada, and Cristobal Cobo. 2016. Unplugging?: Deconstructing the Smart City Unplugging?: Deconstructing the Smart City. 0732, January (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kelsey Campbell-Dollaghan. 2017. Stores Are Not Town Squares. Retrieved September 17, 2017 from https://www.fastcodesign.com/90139799/storesare-not-town-squaresGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin Caraher, S Lloyd, and T Madelin. 2009. Cheap as chicken: fast food outlets in Tower Hamlets (report no 2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rachel Clarke, Sara Heitlinger, Marcus Foth, Carl Disalvo, Ann Light, and Laura Forlano. 2018. Morethan-Human Urban Futures?: Speculative Participatory Design to Avoid Ecocidal Smart Cities. (2018), 18--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Tristan Cork. 2017. Street lights on Bristol to Bath cycle path switched off so glow worms can find love. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/localnews/street-lights-bristol-bath-cycle-182389Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Aidan Davison. 2015. Beyond the mirrored horizon: modern ontology and amodern possibilities in the Anthropocene. Geogr. Res. 53, 3 (2015), 298--305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Carl DiSalvo. 2017. What Else Might a Smart City Be? In Connected Seeds, Sara Heitlinger (ed.). Queen Mary University of London, 24--25. Retrieved from http://www.connectedseeds.org/about/what-elsemight-a-smart-city-beGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Carl Disalvo, Kirsten Boehner, and Nicholas A Knouf. 2009. Nourishing the ground for sustainable HCI: Considerations from ecologically engaged art. Proc. 27th Int. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI '09) (2009), 385--394. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Carl Disalvo and Tom Jenkins. 2017. Fruit Are Heavy?: A Prototype Public IoT System to Support Urban Foraging. (2017), 541--553. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Carl Disalvo, Thomas Lodato, Jonathan Lukens, and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making Public Things?: How HCI Design Can Express Matters of Concern. (2014), 2397--2406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Carl DiSalvo and Jonathan Lukens. 2011. Nonanthropocentrism and the nonhuman in design: possibilities for designing new forms of engagement with and through technology. In From social butterfly to engaged citizen: urban informatics, social media, ubiquitous computing, and mobile technology to support citizen engagement. 440--460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Paul Dourish. 2010. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. Proc. 8th ACM Conf. Des. Interact. Syst.. ACM. (2010), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Laura Forlano. 2016. Decentering the Human in the Design of Collaborative Cities. 32, 3 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sheila Foster and Christian Iaione. 2017. Ostrom in the City: Design Principles for the Urban Common. (2017), 1--24. Retrieved from https://www.thenatureofcities.com/2017/08/20/ostr om-city-design-principles-urban-commons/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Marcus Foth, Martin Brynskov, and Timo Ojala. 2015. Citizen's right to the digital city: urban interfaces, activism, and placemaking. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. David Franquesa and Leandro Navarro. 2017. Sustainability and participation in the digital commons. interactions 24, 3 (2017), 66--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. David Franquesa, Leandro Navarro, and Elinor Ostrom. Sustainability and Participation in the Digital Commons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jennifer Gabrys. 2014. Programming environments?: environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. 32, (2014), 30--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jennifer Gabrys, Helen Pritchard, and Benjamin Barratt. 2016. Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data Soc. 3, 2 (2016), 205395171667967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Filippo Gandino, Bartolomeo Montrucchio, Maurizio Rebaudengo, and Erwing R Sanchez. 2009. On improving automation by integrating RFID in the traceability management of the agri-food sector. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56, 7 (2009), 2357--2365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Antonio-Javier Garcia-Sanchez, Felipe GarciaSanchez, and Joan Garcia-Haro. 2011. Wireless sensor network deployment for integrating videosurveillance and data-monitoring in precision agriculture over distributed crops. Comput. Electron. Agric. 75, 2 (2011), 288--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: Cultural probes. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Franklin Ginn, Uli Beisel, and Maan Barua. 2014. Flourishing with awkward creatures: Togetherness, vulnerability, killing. Environ. Humanit. 4, 1 (2014), 113--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Jonathan Gray, Carolin Gerlitz, and Liliana Bounegru. 2018. Data infrastructure literacy. Big Data Soc. 5, 2 (2018), 205395171878631.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Donna J Haraway. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Garrett Hardin. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science (80-. ). 162, 3859 (1968), 1243--1248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. David Harvey. 2003. The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Reigonal Research 27, 2 ST-The right to the city.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Sara Heitlinger. 2016. Talking Plants and a Bug Hotel: Participatory Design of ludic encounters with an urban farming community. Queen Mary University of London. Retrieved from https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Sara Heitlinger (Ed.). 2017. Connected Seeds. Queen Mary University of London. Retrieved from http://www.connectedseeds.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/02/Connected-SeedsBook_Low-res.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sara Heitlinger and Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2013. Understanding performative behaviour within content-rich Digital Live Art. Digit. Creat. 24, 2 (June 2013), 111--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Rob Comber. 2018. Connected Seeds and Sensors: Codesigning Internet of Things for Sustainable Smart Cities with urban food-growing communities. In Participatory Design Conference (PDC'18). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Janis Jefferies. 2013. Sustainable HCI for grassroots urban food-growing communities. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration, 255--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Janis Jefferies. 2014. The talking plants: an interactive system for grassroots urban food-growing communities. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 459--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Sara Heitlinger, Marcus Foth, Rachel Clarke, Carl DiSalvo, Ann Light, and Laura Forlano. 2018. Avoiding Ecocidal Smart Cities: Participatory Design for More-than-human Futures. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2 (PDC '18), 51:1--51:3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Donna Houston, Diana Maccallum, Wendy Steele, and Jason Byrne. 2017. Make kin, not cities?! Multispecies entanglements and becoming-world ' in planning theory. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Rachel Jacobs, Steve Benford, Mark Selby, Michael Golembewski, Dominic Price, and Gabriella Giannachi. 2013. A Conversation Between Trees: What Data Feels Like in the Forest. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 129--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Yoshifuyu Karakasa, Hirohiko Suwa, and Toshimizu Ohta. 2007. Evaluating Effects of RFID Introduction Based on CO2 Reduction. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the ISSS2007, Tokyo, Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Nanda Khaorapapong. 2016. Connected Seeds sensors. Retrieved September 17, 2017 from https://github.com/haddadi/cs-sensor-unitGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Bran Knowles, Lynne Blair, Mike Hazas, and Stuart Walker. 2013. Exploring Sustainability Research in Computing: Where We Are and Where We Go Next. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '13), 305--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Henri Lefebvre. 1991. The production of space. Oxford Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Henri Lefebvre. 1996. The right to the city. Writings on cities 63181, (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Henri Lefebvre. 2009. State, space, world: Selected essays. U of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Ann Light, Irina Shklovski, and Alison Powell. 2017. Design for Existential Crisis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 722--734. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Donna Lipowitz. 2017. Connected Seeds film. Retrieved February 5, 2018 from http://www.connectedseeds.org/connected-seedsfilmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Jen Liu, Daragh Byrne, and Laura Devendorf. 2018. Design for Collaborative Survival?: An Inquiry into Human-Fungi Relationships. Proc. CHI (2018), 1-- 13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Thomas Lodato and Carl DiSalvo. 2018. Institutional Constraints: The Forms and Limits of Participatory Design in the Public Realm. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '18), 5:1--5:12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. C A Lowry, J H Hollis, A de Vries, B Pan, L R Brunet, J R F Hunt, J F R Paton, E van Kampen, D M Knight, A K Evans, G A W Rook, and S L Lightman. 2007. Identification of an immuneresponsive mesolimbocortical serotonergic system: Potential role in regulation of emotional behavior. Neuroscience 146, 2 (2007), 756--772.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Anna Luusua and Johanna Ylipulli. 2017. Nonanthropocentric design and smart cities in the anthropocene. 59, 6 (2017), 295--304.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Luisa Maffi and Ellen Woodley. 2012. Biocultural diversity conservation: a global sourcebook. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. John McDonagh. 2014. Rural geography II: Discourses of food and sustainable rural futures. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 38, 6 (2014), 838--844.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Anna Minton. 2012. Ground Control: Fear and happiness in the twenty-first-century city. Penguin UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Jason W Moore. 2017. The Capitalocene, Part I: on the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. J. Peasant Stud. 44, 3 (2017), 594--630.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Paul D Mullins. 2017. The Ubiquitous-Eco-City of Songdo?: An Urban Systems Perspective on South Korea ' s Green City Approach. 2, 2 (2017), 4--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Elinor Ostrom. 2015. Governing the commons. Cambridge university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Val Plumwood. 2010. Nature in the active voice. Clim. Chang. Philos. Transform. possibilities (2010), 32--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Maria Puig de la Bellacasa. 2011. Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Soc. Stud. Sci. 41, 1 (2011), 85--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Maria Puig de la Bellacasa. 2015. Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Soc. Stud. Sci. 45, 5 (2015), 691--716.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Mark Purcell. 2002. Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal 58, 2/3 (2002), 99--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Mark Purcell and Shannon K Tyman. 2017. Cultivating food as a right to the city. 9839, July (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Alexandra Regan Toland. 2016. Dust Blooms. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from https://artoland.wordpress.com/2016/06/28/dustblooms/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Anna Seravalli. 2018. Infrastructuring Urban Commons over Time?: Learnings from Two Cases. (2018), 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Jack Shenker. 2017. Revealed: the insidious creep of pseudo-public space in London. The Guardian. Retrieved August 31, 2018 from https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jul/24/rev ealed-pseudo-public-space-pops-londoninvestigation-mapGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Nancy Smith, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2017. Designing for Cohabitation: Naturecultures, Hybrids, and Decentering the Human in Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 1714--1725. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Yolande Strengers. 2014. Smart Energy in Everyday Life: Are you Designing for Resource Man? Interactions 21, 4 (2014), 24--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Lucy Suchman. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Alex S Taylor. 2017. What Lines, Rats, and Sheep CanTell Us. Des. Issues 33, 111 (2017), 54--65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Annika Wolff, Daniel Gooch, Jose J Cavero Montaner, Umar Rashid, and Gerd Kortuem. 2016. Creating an Understanding of Data Literacy for a Data-driven Society Creating an Understanding of Data Literacy for a Data-driven Society. J. Community Informatics 12, 3 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Campaign for Seed-Sovereignty. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from http://www.seedsovereignty.org/EN/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Connected Seeds Celebration. Retrieved February 5, 2018 from http://www.connectedseeds.org/celebration-seedslaunch-event-part-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. 2013. Household income in Tower Hamlets. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from https://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/Documents/Boro ugh_statistics/Income_poverty_and_welfare/Resear ch-Briefing-2013-04-Household-Income-final.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. 2016. Poverty in your area 2016. Retrieved from http://www.endchildpoverty.org.uk/poverty-inyour-area-2016/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. 2017. Connected Seeds Exhibition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. 2017. Connected Seeds visualisation. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from http://www.connectedseeds.org/data-visualisation/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Right to the Sustainable Smart City

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      9077 pages
      ISBN:9781450359702
      DOI:10.1145/3290605

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format