ABSTRACT
Environmental concerns have driven an interest in sustainable smart cities, through the monitoring and optimisation of networked infrastructures. At the same time, there are concerns about who these interventions and services are for, and who benefits. HCI researchers and designers interested in civic life have started to call for the democratisation of urban space through resistance and political action to challenge state and corporate claims. This paper contributes to an emerging body of work that seeks to involve citizens in the design of sustainable smart cities, particularly in the context of marginalised and culturally diverse urban communities. We present a study involving co-designing Internet of Things with urban agricultural communities and discuss three ways in which design can participate in the right to the sustainable smart city through designing for the commons, care, and biocultural diversity.
Supplemental Material
- Samuel Alexander. 2015. Prosperous descent: Crisis as opportunity in an age of limits. Simplicity Institute.Google Scholar
- Panayotis Antoniadis, Ileana Apostol, Mark Gaved, Michael Smyth, and Andreas Unteidig. 2015. DIY networking as a facilitator for interdisciplinary research on the hybrid city. Hybrid Cities 2015 Data to People (2015), 65--72.Google Scholar
- Aline Baggio. 2005. Wireless sensor networks in precision agriculture. In ACM Workshop on RealWorld Wireless Sensor Networks (REALWSN 2005), Stockholm, Sweden, 1567--1576.Google Scholar
- Corelia Baibarac and Doina Petrescu. 2017. Codesign and urban resilience: visioning tools for commoning resilience practices. CoDesign 0882, December (2017), 1--19.Google Scholar
- Karen S Baker and Helena Karasti. 2018. Data Care and Its Politics: Designing for Local Collective Data Management As a Neglected Thing. Proc. 15th Particip. Des. Conf. Full Pap. - Vol. 1 (2018), 10:1--10:12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mara Balestrini, Yvonne Rogers, Carolyn Hassan, Javi Creus, Martha King, and Paul Marshall. 2017. A City in Common: A Framework to Orchestrate Large-scale Citizen Engagement Around Urban Issues. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 2282--2294. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeremy Brice. 2014. Killing in More-than-human Spaces?: Pasteurisation, Fungi, and the Metabolic Lives of Wine. 4, (2014), 171--194.Google Scholar
- Hronn Brynjarsdottir, Maria Håkansson, James Pierce, Eric Baumer, Carl DiSalvo, and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Sustainably unpersuaded: How Persuasion Narrows Our Vision of Sustainability. Proc. 2012 ACM Annu. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - CHI '12 (2012), 947. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Igor Calzada, Cristobal Cobo, Igor Calzada, and Cristobal Cobo. 2016. Unplugging?: Deconstructing the Smart City Unplugging?: Deconstructing the Smart City. 0732, January (2016).Google Scholar
- Kelsey Campbell-Dollaghan. 2017. Stores Are Not Town Squares. Retrieved September 17, 2017 from https://www.fastcodesign.com/90139799/storesare-not-town-squaresGoogle Scholar
- Martin Caraher, S Lloyd, and T Madelin. 2009. Cheap as chicken: fast food outlets in Tower Hamlets (report no 2).Google Scholar
- Rachel Clarke, Sara Heitlinger, Marcus Foth, Carl Disalvo, Ann Light, and Laura Forlano. 2018. Morethan-Human Urban Futures?: Speculative Participatory Design to Avoid Ecocidal Smart Cities. (2018), 18--21.Google Scholar
- Tristan Cork. 2017. Street lights on Bristol to Bath cycle path switched off so glow worms can find love. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/localnews/street-lights-bristol-bath-cycle-182389Google Scholar
- Aidan Davison. 2015. Beyond the mirrored horizon: modern ontology and amodern possibilities in the Anthropocene. Geogr. Res. 53, 3 (2015), 298--305.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carl DiSalvo. 2017. What Else Might a Smart City Be? In Connected Seeds, Sara Heitlinger (ed.). Queen Mary University of London, 24--25. Retrieved from http://www.connectedseeds.org/about/what-elsemight-a-smart-city-beGoogle Scholar
- Carl Disalvo, Kirsten Boehner, and Nicholas A Knouf. 2009. Nourishing the ground for sustainable HCI: Considerations from ecologically engaged art. Proc. 27th Int. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI '09) (2009), 385--394. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carl Disalvo and Tom Jenkins. 2017. Fruit Are Heavy?: A Prototype Public IoT System to Support Urban Foraging. (2017), 541--553. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carl Disalvo, Thomas Lodato, Jonathan Lukens, and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making Public Things?: How HCI Design Can Express Matters of Concern. (2014), 2397--2406. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carl DiSalvo and Jonathan Lukens. 2011. Nonanthropocentrism and the nonhuman in design: possibilities for designing new forms of engagement with and through technology. In From social butterfly to engaged citizen: urban informatics, social media, ubiquitous computing, and mobile technology to support citizen engagement. 440--460.Google Scholar
- Paul Dourish. 2010. HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics. Proc. 8th ACM Conf. Des. Interact. Syst.. ACM. (2010), 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laura Forlano. 2016. Decentering the Human in the Design of Collaborative Cities. 32, 3 (2016).Google Scholar
- Sheila Foster and Christian Iaione. 2017. Ostrom in the City: Design Principles for the Urban Common. (2017), 1--24. Retrieved from https://www.thenatureofcities.com/2017/08/20/ostr om-city-design-principles-urban-commons/Google Scholar
- Marcus Foth, Martin Brynskov, and Timo Ojala. 2015. Citizen's right to the digital city: urban interfaces, activism, and placemaking. Springer. Google Scholar
- David Franquesa and Leandro Navarro. 2017. Sustainability and participation in the digital commons. interactions 24, 3 (2017), 66--69. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Franquesa, Leandro Navarro, and Elinor Ostrom. Sustainability and Participation in the Digital Commons. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennifer Gabrys. 2014. Programming environments?: environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. 32, (2014), 30--48.Google Scholar
- Jennifer Gabrys, Helen Pritchard, and Benjamin Barratt. 2016. Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data Soc. 3, 2 (2016), 205395171667967.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Filippo Gandino, Bartolomeo Montrucchio, Maurizio Rebaudengo, and Erwing R Sanchez. 2009. On improving automation by integrating RFID in the traceability management of the agri-food sector. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56, 7 (2009), 2357--2365.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Antonio-Javier Garcia-Sanchez, Felipe GarciaSanchez, and Joan Garcia-Haro. 2011. Wireless sensor network deployment for integrating videosurveillance and data-monitoring in precision agriculture over distributed crops. Comput. Electron. Agric. 75, 2 (2011), 288--303. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: Cultural probes. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Franklin Ginn, Uli Beisel, and Maan Barua. 2014. Flourishing with awkward creatures: Togetherness, vulnerability, killing. Environ. Humanit. 4, 1 (2014), 113--123.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonathan Gray, Carolin Gerlitz, and Liliana Bounegru. 2018. Data infrastructure literacy. Big Data Soc. 5, 2 (2018), 205395171878631.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donna J Haraway. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Garrett Hardin. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science (80-. ). 162, 3859 (1968), 1243--1248.Google Scholar
- David Harvey. 2003. The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Reigonal Research 27, 2 ST-The right to the city.Google Scholar
- Sara Heitlinger. 2016. Talking Plants and a Bug Hotel: Participatory Design of ludic encounters with an urban farming community. Queen Mary University of London. Retrieved from https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/1Google Scholar
- Sara Heitlinger (Ed.). 2017. Connected Seeds. Queen Mary University of London. Retrieved from http://www.connectedseeds.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/02/Connected-SeedsBook_Low-res.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Sara Heitlinger and Nick Bryan-Kinns. 2013. Understanding performative behaviour within content-rich Digital Live Art. Digit. Creat. 24, 2 (June 2013), 111--118.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Rob Comber. 2018. Connected Seeds and Sensors: Codesigning Internet of Things for Sustainable Smart Cities with urban food-growing communities. In Participatory Design Conference (PDC'18). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Janis Jefferies. 2013. Sustainable HCI for grassroots urban food-growing communities. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration, 255--264. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Janis Jefferies. 2014. The talking plants: an interactive system for grassroots urban food-growing communities. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 459--462. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sara Heitlinger, Marcus Foth, Rachel Clarke, Carl DiSalvo, Ann Light, and Laura Forlano. 2018. Avoiding Ecocidal Smart Cities: Participatory Design for More-than-human Futures. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2 (PDC '18), 51:1--51:3. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donna Houston, Diana Maccallum, Wendy Steele, and Jason Byrne. 2017. Make kin, not cities?! Multispecies entanglements and becoming-world ' in planning theory. (2017).Google Scholar
- Rachel Jacobs, Steve Benford, Mark Selby, Michael Golembewski, Dominic Price, and Gabriella Giannachi. 2013. A Conversation Between Trees: What Data Feels Like in the Forest. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), 129--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yoshifuyu Karakasa, Hirohiko Suwa, and Toshimizu Ohta. 2007. Evaluating Effects of RFID Introduction Based on CO2 Reduction. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the ISSS2007, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
- Nanda Khaorapapong. 2016. Connected Seeds sensors. Retrieved September 17, 2017 from https://github.com/haddadi/cs-sensor-unitGoogle Scholar
- Bran Knowles, Lynne Blair, Mike Hazas, and Stuart Walker. 2013. Exploring Sustainability Research in Computing: Where We Are and Where We Go Next. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '13), 305--314. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henri Lefebvre. 1991. The production of space. Oxford Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Henri Lefebvre. 1996. The right to the city. Writings on cities 63181, (1996).Google Scholar
- Henri Lefebvre. 2009. State, space, world: Selected essays. U of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Ann Light, Irina Shklovski, and Alison Powell. 2017. Design for Existential Crisis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 722--734. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donna Lipowitz. 2017. Connected Seeds film. Retrieved February 5, 2018 from http://www.connectedseeds.org/connected-seedsfilmGoogle Scholar
- Jen Liu, Daragh Byrne, and Laura Devendorf. 2018. Design for Collaborative Survival?: An Inquiry into Human-Fungi Relationships. Proc. CHI (2018), 1-- 13. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Lodato and Carl DiSalvo. 2018. Institutional Constraints: The Forms and Limits of Participatory Design in the Public Realm. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '18), 5:1--5:12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C A Lowry, J H Hollis, A de Vries, B Pan, L R Brunet, J R F Hunt, J F R Paton, E van Kampen, D M Knight, A K Evans, G A W Rook, and S L Lightman. 2007. Identification of an immuneresponsive mesolimbocortical serotonergic system: Potential role in regulation of emotional behavior. Neuroscience 146, 2 (2007), 756--772.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anna Luusua and Johanna Ylipulli. 2017. Nonanthropocentric design and smart cities in the anthropocene. 59, 6 (2017), 295--304.Google Scholar
- Luisa Maffi and Ellen Woodley. 2012. Biocultural diversity conservation: a global sourcebook. Routledge.Google Scholar
- John McDonagh. 2014. Rural geography II: Discourses of food and sustainable rural futures. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 38, 6 (2014), 838--844.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anna Minton. 2012. Ground Control: Fear and happiness in the twenty-first-century city. Penguin UK.Google Scholar
- Jason W Moore. 2017. The Capitalocene, Part I: on the nature and origins of our ecological crisis. J. Peasant Stud. 44, 3 (2017), 594--630.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul D Mullins. 2017. The Ubiquitous-Eco-City of Songdo?: An Urban Systems Perspective on South Korea ' s Green City Approach. 2, 2 (2017), 4--12.Google Scholar
- Elinor Ostrom. 2015. Governing the commons. Cambridge university press.Google Scholar
- Val Plumwood. 2010. Nature in the active voice. Clim. Chang. Philos. Transform. possibilities (2010), 32--47.Google Scholar
- Maria Puig de la Bellacasa. 2011. Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Soc. Stud. Sci. 41, 1 (2011), 85--106.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maria Puig de la Bellacasa. 2015. Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Soc. Stud. Sci. 45, 5 (2015), 691--716.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Purcell. 2002. Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal 58, 2/3 (2002), 99--108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Purcell and Shannon K Tyman. 2017. Cultivating food as a right to the city. 9839, July (2017).Google Scholar
- Alexandra Regan Toland. 2016. Dust Blooms. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from https://artoland.wordpress.com/2016/06/28/dustblooms/Google Scholar
- Anna Seravalli. 2018. Infrastructuring Urban Commons over Time?: Learnings from Two Cases. (2018), 1--11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jack Shenker. 2017. Revealed: the insidious creep of pseudo-public space in London. The Guardian. Retrieved August 31, 2018 from https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jul/24/rev ealed-pseudo-public-space-pops-londoninvestigation-mapGoogle Scholar
- Nancy Smith, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2017. Designing for Cohabitation: Naturecultures, Hybrids, and Decentering the Human in Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 1714--1725. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yolande Strengers. 2014. Smart Energy in Everyday Life: Are you Designing for Resource Man? Interactions 21, 4 (2014), 24--31. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lucy Suchman. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex S Taylor. 2017. What Lines, Rats, and Sheep CanTell Us. Des. Issues 33, 111 (2017), 54--65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Annika Wolff, Daniel Gooch, Jose J Cavero Montaner, Umar Rashid, and Gerd Kortuem. 2016. Creating an Understanding of Data Literacy for a Data-driven Society Creating an Understanding of Data Literacy for a Data-driven Society. J. Community Informatics 12, 3 (2016).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Campaign for Seed-Sovereignty. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from http://www.seedsovereignty.org/EN/Google Scholar
- Connected Seeds Celebration. Retrieved February 5, 2018 from http://www.connectedseeds.org/celebration-seedslaunch-event-part-1Google Scholar
- 2013. Household income in Tower Hamlets. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from https://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/Documents/Boro ugh_statistics/Income_poverty_and_welfare/Resear ch-Briefing-2013-04-Household-Income-final.pdfGoogle Scholar
- 2016. Poverty in your area 2016. Retrieved from http://www.endchildpoverty.org.uk/poverty-inyour-area-2016/Google Scholar
- 2017. Connected Seeds Exhibition.Google Scholar
- 2017. Connected Seeds visualisation. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from http://www.connectedseeds.org/data-visualisation/Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The Right to the Sustainable Smart City
Recommendations
Connected seeds and sensors: co-designing internet of things for sustainable smart cities with urban food-growing communities
PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2We present a case study of a participatory design project in the space of sustainable smart cities and Internet of Things. We describe our design process that led to the development of an interactive seed library that tells the stories of culturally ...
Avoiding ecocidal smart cities: participatory design for more-than-human futures
PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2The turn to participation in smart cities was intended to increase the involvement of diverse, often marginalised, citizens in the design and use of networked sensing technologies. However, ideals of activism, citizen engagement and democratisation ...
Sustainable HCI for grassroots urban food-growing communities
OzCHI '13: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, CollaborationMainstream food growing practices around the world call in to question our future food security, and in particular the sustainability of food consumption in urban centres. At the same time there has been a dramatic recent increase in grassroots urban ...
Comments