skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300552acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Older People Inventing their Personal Internet of Things with the IoT Un-Kit Experience

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce the IoT Un-Kit Experience, a co-design approach that engages people in exploring, designing and generating personally meaningful IoT applications and that also serves as a means to explore IoT kit design through in-home workshops. Un-Kit represents a seemingly uncompleted set of sensors, actuators and media elements that have a decontextualized appearance - unfinished state, undefined purpose and unboxed form. The approach emphasises users contemplating and experiencing the IoT elements in their familiar space through detailed and layered conversation with researchers; rather than focusing on connecting up the kit itself, thus their ideas are not constrained by the kit or their competence with it. We illustrate the approach through in-home workshops with older adults, envisioned users of IoT who have had limited voice in its conception. The Un-kit approach supported participants to lead the process and to imagine new artfully integrated designs, with personally legible interactions and aesthetic qualities that fit their desire. We offer insights for a more situated and responsive approach to design of the IoT and its constituent kits.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper322.mp4

mp4

310.7 MB

References

  1. Juan C. Aceros, Jeannette Pols, and Miquel Domènech. 2015. Where is grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 93, (2015), 102--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Aloha Hufana Ambe, Margot Brereton, Alessandro Soro, and Paul Roe. 2017. Technology Individuation: The Foibles of Augmented Everyday Objects. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2017), 6632--6644. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Luigi Atzori, Antonio Iera, and Giacomo Morabito. 2011. SIoT: Giving a Social Structure to the Internet of Things. Communications Letters, IEEE 15, 1193--1195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbara Rita Barricelli and Stefano Valtolina. 2015. Designing for enduser development in the internet of things. In International Symposium on End User Development, 9--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. E Brandt, T Binder, and L Malmborg. 2010. Communities of Everyday Practice and Situated Elderliness As an Approach to Co-design for Senior Interaction. In Proceedings of the 22Nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, 400--403. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Margot Brereton. 2009. Designing from Somewhere: A located, relational and transformative view of design. T. Bind. J. Löwgren L. Malmborg (2009), 100--119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Margot Brereton. 2013. Habituated Objects: Everyday Tangibles That Foster the Independent Living of an Elderly Woman. Interactions 20, 4 (2013), 20--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Margot Brereton, Paul Roe, Ronald Schroeter, and Anita Lee Hong. 2014. Beyond Ethnography: Engagement and Reciprocity As Foundations for Design Research Out Here. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 1183--1186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Margot Brereton, Alessandro Soro, Kate Vaisutis, and Paul Roe. 2015. The Messaging Kettle: Prototyping Connection over a Distance Between Adult Children and Older Parents. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, 713-- 716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Leah Buechley, Mike Eisenberg, Jaime Catchen, and Ali Crockett. 2008. The LilyPad Arduino. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '08, 423.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Toni Calasanti. 2016. Combating Ageism: How Successful Is Successful Aging? Gerontologist 56, 6 (2016), 1093--1101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jennie Carroll. 2004. Completing Design in Use?: Closing the Appropriation Cycle. In European Conference of Information Systems, January 2004, 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Min Zhen Chai, Alessandro Soro, Paul Roe, and Margot Brereton. 2017. Cooking Together at a Distance: Sustain Connectedness for Long Distance Families. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17), 2437-- 2444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Minjoo Cho and Daniel Saakes. 2017. Calm Automaton: A DIY Toolkit for Ambient Displays. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17), 393-- 396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Joshua Chuang, Lubaina Maimoon, Shuo Yu, Hongyi Zhu, Casper Nybroe, Owen Hsiao, Shu-hsing Li, Hsinmin Lu, and Hsinchun Chen. 2016. SilverLink: Smart Home Health Monitoring for Senior Care. In International Conference on Smart Health '15, 3--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Giuseppe Desolda, Carmelo Ardito, and Maristella Matera. 2017. Empowering end users to customize their smart environments: model, composition paradigms, and domain-specific tools. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 24, 2 (2017), 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Alan Dix. 2007. Designing for Appropriation. In Proceedings of the 21st BCS HCI Group Conference, 2--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Angelika Dohr, Robert Modre-Opsrian, Mario Drobics, Dieter Hayn, and Günter Schreier. 2010. The internet of things for ambient assisted living. In Information technology: new generations (ITNG), 2010 seventh international conference on, 804--809. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nicola Dragoni, Alberto Giaretta, and Manuel Mazzara. 2016. The internet of hackable things. In International Conference in Software Engineering for Defence Applications, 129--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeannette Durick, Toni Robertson, Margot Brereton, Frank Vetere, and Bjorn Nansen. 2013. Dispelling ageing myths in technology design. Proc. 25th Aust. Comput. Interact. Conf. Augment. Appl. Innov. Collab. - OzCHI '13 (2013), 467--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Michel Ehrenhard, Bjorn Kijl, and Lambert Nieuwenhuis. 2014. Market adoption barriers of multi-stakeholder technology: Smart homes for the aging population. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 89, (2014), 306--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Rocio Fernandez-Ballesteros. 2011. Positive ageing: Objective, subjective, and combined outcomes. E-Journal Appl. Psychol. 7, 1 (2011), 22--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Gerhard Fischer and Andreas C. Lemke. 1988. Construction Kits and Design Environments. ACM SIGCHI Bull. 20, 1 (July 1988), 81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Joel E. Fischer, Andy Crabtree, Tom Rodden, James A. Colley, Enrico Costanza, Michael O. Jewell, and Sarvapali D. Ramchurn. 2016. "Just whack it on until it gets hot" In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 5933-- 5944. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Joep Frens, Mathias Funk, Bastiaan van Hout, and Joep Le Blanc. 2018. Designing the IoT Sandbox. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18), 341--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. William Gaver, Andy Boucher, Sarah Pennington, and Brendan Walker. 2004. Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interact. - Funology 11(5), September to October (2004), 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Daniel López Gómez. 2015. Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 93, (2015), 91--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Florian Güldenpfennig. 2018. Tailor-made Accessible Computers: An Interactive Toolkit for Iterative Co-Design. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '18), 231--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Michael Heidt, Arne Berger, Kevin Lefeuvre, and Maximilian Eibl. 2015. Miteinander: Engaging Intergenerational Participation With Playful Methods & Intelligent Things.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Steven Houben, Connie Golsteijn, Sarah Gallacher, Rose Johnson, Saskia Bakker, Nicolai Marquardt, Licia Capra, and Yvonne Rogers. 2016. Physikit: Data Engagement Through Physical Ambient Visualizations in the Home. Proc. 2016 CHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI '16) (2016), 1608--1619. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bosse Westerlund, Benjamin B Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, Björn Eiderbäck, Sinna Lindquist, and Yngve Sundblad. 2003. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Yolande Strengers, Dimitrios Raptis, Larissa Nicholls, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B Skov. 2018. Exploring Hygge As a Desirable Design Vision for the Sustainable Smart Home. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18), 355--360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Marije Kanis, Saskia Robben, Judith Hagen, Anne Bimmerman, Natasja Wagelaar, and Ben Krose. 2013. Sensor Monitoring in the Home: Giving Voice to Elderly People. In Proceedings of the ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques, 97--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Kevin Lefeuvre, Soeren Totzauer, Michael Storz, Albrecht Kurze, Andreas Bischof, and Arne Berger. 2018. Bricks, Blocks, Boxes, Cubes, and Dice: On the Role of Cubic Shapes for the Design of Tangible Interactive Devices. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18), 485--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kevin Lefeuvre, Sören Totzauer, Andreas Bischof, Albrecht Kurze, Michael Storz, Lisa Ullmann, and Arne Berger. 2016. Loaded Dice: Exploring the Design Space of Connected Devices with Blind and Visually Impaired People. Proc. 9th Nord. Conf. Human-Computer Interact. - Nord. '16 (2016), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Tuck Wah Leong and Toni Robertson. 2016. Voicing Values: Laying Foundations for Ageing People to Participate in Design. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '16), 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Ann Light and Yoko Akama. 2012. The Human Touch: Participatory Practice and the Role of Facilitation in Designing with Communities. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers Volume 1 (PDC '12), 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ann Light, Tuck W Leong, and Toni Robertson. 2015. Ageing well with CSCW. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19--23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway, 295--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Ann Light, Sonja Pedell, Toni Robertson, Jenny Waycott, Jeanette Bell, Jeannette Durick, and Tuck Wah Leong. 2016. What's special about aging. Interactions 23, 2 (2016), 66--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Y Lim, D Kim, J Jo, and J Woo. 2013. Discovery-Driven Prototyping for User-Driven Creativity. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 12, 3 (July 2013), 74--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Sian Lindley and Jayne Wallace. 2015. Placing in Age?: Transitioning to a New Home in Later Life. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 22, 4 (2015), 1-- 39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Janis Lena Meissner, Angelika Strohmayer, Peter Wright, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2018. A Schnittmuster for Crafting Context-Sensitive Toolkits. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18), 151:1--151:13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. David A Mellis, Sam Jacoby, Leah Buechley, Hannah Perner-Wilson, and Jie Qi. 2013. Microcontrollers As Material: Crafting Circuits with Paper, Conductive Ink, Electronic Components, and an "Untoolkit." In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '13), 83--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Gratiane de Moustier. 2008. The Story of Odile. Gratiane de Moustier. Retrieved June 26, 2016 from http://gratianedemoustier.com/stories/thestory-of-odile/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. MJ Michael J. Muller and Sarah Kuhn. 1993. Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36, 6 (1993), 24--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Jim Rowan, Annie Jacobs, and Sarah Craighill. 2001. Digital Family Portraits: Supporting Peace of Mind for Extended Family Members. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. factors Comput. Syst. (2001), 333--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Soud Nassir, Tuck Wah Leong, and Toni Robertson. 2015. Positive Ageing?: Elements and factors for design. In OzCHI '2015, 265--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Todd D. Nelson. 2005. Ageism: Prejudice against our feared future self. J. Soc. Issues 61, 2 (2005), 207--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Louis Neven. 2010. "But obviously not for me": robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociol. Health Illn. 32, 2 (2010), 335--347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Aisling Ann O'Kane, Yvonne Rogers, and Ann Blandford. 2014. Gaining empathy for non-routine mobile device use hrough autoethnography. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. - Proc. (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Fabio Paternò and Carmen Santoro. 2017. A design space for end user development in the time of the internet of things. In New perspectives in end-user development. Springer, 43--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Hannah Perner-Wilson, Leah Buechley, and Mika Satomi. 2011. Handcrafting textile interfaces from a kit-of-no-parts. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction - TEI '11, 61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. M W Raad and L T Yang. 2009. A ubiquitous smart home for elderly. July 2008 (2009), 529--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Kai Riemer and Robert Bruce Johnstone. 2012. Place-making: A Phenomenological Theory of Technology Appropriation. In Proc. of 33rd International Conference on Information Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Yvonne Rogers. 2006. Moving on from Weiser's Vision of Calm Computing: Engaging UbiComp Experiences. In UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), 404--421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Yvonne Rogers, Jeni Paay, and Margot Brereton. 2014. Never Too Old: Engaging Retired People Inventing the Future with MaKey MaKey. Chi (2014), 3913--3922. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Jim Rowan and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2005. Digital Family Portrait Field Trial: Support for Aging in Place. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1 (March 2008), 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2014. Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign 10, 1 (2014), 5--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Alessandro Soro, Aloha Hufana Ambe, and Margot Brereton. 2017. Minding the gap: Reconciling human and technical perspectives on the IoT for healthy ageing. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2017, (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Alessandro Soro, Margot Brereton, Tshering Dema, Jessica L Oliver, Min Zhen Chai, and Aloha May Hufana Ambe. 2018. The Ambient Birdhouse: An IoT Device to Discover Birds and Engage with Nature. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18), 397:1--397:13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Alessandro Soro, Margot Brereton, and Paul Roe. 2015. The Messaging Kettle: It's IoTea Time. In Proceedings of the 5th Decennial Aarhus Conference, 57--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Alessandro Soro, Margot Brereton, and Paul Roe. 2016. Towards an Analysis Framework of Technology Habituation by Older Users. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16), 1021--1033. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Alessandro Soro, Margot Brereton, and Paul Roe. 2018. Social Internet of Things (1st ed.). Springer International Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Alessandro Soro, Margot Brereton, Jennyfer Lawrence Taylor, Anita Lee Hong, and Paul Roe. 2016. Cross-cultural dialogical probes. In Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction, 114--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Linda Tonolli, Maurizio Teli, and Vincenzo D'Andrea. 2015. A Design Anthropology Critique of Active Aging as Ageism. IxD&A 26, (2015), 95--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Kate Vaisutis, Margot Brereton, Toni Robertson, Frank Vetere, Jeannette Durick, Bjorn Nansen, and Laurie Buys. 2014. Invisible Connections: Investigating Older People's Emotions and Social Relations Around Objects. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 1937--1940. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. John Vines, Gary Pritchard, Peter Wright, Patrick Olivier, and Katie Brittain. 2015. An age-old problem: Examining the discourses of ageing in HCI and strategies for future research. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 22, 1 (2015), 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. David Wainwright. 1997. Can sociological research be qualitative, critical and valid? Qual. Rep. 3, 2 (1997), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Jenny Waycott, Sonja Pedell, Frank Vetere, Elizabeth Ozanne, Lars Kulik, Alan Gruner, and John Downs. 2012. Actively engaging older adults in the development and evaluation of tablet technology. OzCHI '12 Proc. 24th Aust. Comput. Interact. Conf. (2012), 643--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Jenny Waycott, Frank Vetere, Sonja Pedell, Amee Morgans, Elizabeth Ozanne, and Lars Kulik. 2016. Not For Me: Older Adults Choosing Not to Participate in a Social Isolation Intervention. In CHI '16, 745--757. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Susan Wyche, Phoebe Sengers, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2006. Historical analysis: Using the past to design the future. Ubicomp (2006), 35--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Junnan Yu and Ricarose Roque. 2018. A Survey of Computational Kits for Young Children. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '18), 289--299. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Zhi-Kai Zhang, Michael Cheng Yi Cho, Chia-Wei Wang, Chia-Wei Hsu, Chong-Kuan Chen, and Shiuhpyng Shieh. 2014. IoT security: ongoing challenges and research opportunities. In Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA), 2014 IEEE 7th International Conference on, 230-- 234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Older People Inventing their Personal Internet of Things with the IoT Un-Kit Experience

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2019
      9077 pages
      ISBN:9781450359702
      DOI:10.1145/3290605

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 May 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format