skip to main content
10.1145/3298689.3347041acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Performance comparison of neural and non-neural approaches to session-based recommendation

Published:10 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The benefits of neural approaches are undisputed in many application areas. However, today's research practice in applied machine learning---where researchers often use a variety of baselines, datasets, and evaluation procedures---can make it difficult to understand how much progress is actually achieved through novel technical approaches. In this work, we focus on the fast-developing area of session-based recommendation and aim to contribute to a better understanding of what represents the state-of-the-art.

To that purpose, we have conducted an extensive set of experiments, using a variety of datasets, in which we benchmarked four neural approaches that were published in the last three years against each other and against a set of simpler baseline techniques, e.g., based on nearest neighbors. The evaluation of the algorithms under the exact same conditions revealed that the benefits of applying today's neural approaches to session-based recommendations are still limited. In the majority of the cases, and in particular when precision and recall are used, it turned out that simple techniques in most cases outperform recent neural approaches. Our findings therefore point to certain major limitations of today's research practice. By sharing our evaluation framework publicly, we hope that some of these limitations can be overcome in the future.

References

  1. Timothy G. Armstrong, Alistair Moffat, William Webber, and Justin Zobel. 2009. Improvements That Don't Add Up: Ad-hoc Retrieval Results Since 1998. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '09). 601--610. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gabriel de Souza Pereira Moreira, Felipe Ferreira, and Adilson Marques da Cunha. 2018. News Session-Based Recommendations using Deep Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Deep Learning for Recommender Systems (DLRS) '18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Hailin Fu, Jianguo Li, Jiemin Chen, Yong Tang, and Jia Zhu. 2018. Sequence-Based Recommendation with Bidirectional LSTM Network. In Advances in Multimedia Information Processing (PCM '18). 428--438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Balázs Hidasi and Alexandros Karatzoglou. 2018. Recurrent Neural Networks with Top-k Gains for Session-based Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '18). 843--852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Balázs Hidasi, Alexandros Karatzoglou, Linas Baltrunas, and Domonkos Tikk. 2016. Session-based Recommendations with Recurrent Neural Networks. In Proceedings International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR '16).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jin Huang, Wayne Xin Zhao, Hongjian Dou, Ji-Rong Wen, and Edward Y. Chang. 2018. Improving Sequential Recommendation with Knowledge-Enhanced Memory Networks. In Proceedings of the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '18). 505--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dietmar Jannach and Malte Ludewig. 2017. When Recurrent Neural Networks Meet the Neighborhood for Session-Based Recommendation. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '17). 306--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jing Li, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Zhaochun Ren, Tao Lian, and Jun Ma. 2017. Neural Attentive Session-based Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '17). 1419--1428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Zhi Li, Hongke Zhao, Qi Liu, Zhenya Huang, Tao Mei, and Enhong Chen. 2018. Learning from History and Present: Next-item Recommendation via Discriminatively Exploiting User Behaviors. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD '18). 1734--1743. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jimmy Lin. 2019. The Neural Hype and Comparisons Against Weak Baselines. SIGIR Forum 52, 2 (Jan. 2019), 40--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Xiang Lin, Shuzi Niu, Yiqiao Wang, and Yucheng Li. 2018. K-plet Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequential Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '18). 1057--1060. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zachary C. Lipton and Jacob Steinhardt. 2018. Troubling Trends in Machine Learning Scholarship. arXiv:1807.03341 Presented at ICML '18: The Debates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Qiao Liu, Yifu Zeng, Refuoe Mokhosi, and Haibin Zhang. 2018. STAMP: Short-Term Attention/Memory Priority Model for Session-based Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD '18). 1831--1839. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pablo Loyola, Chen Liu, and Yu Hirate. 2017. Modeling User Session and Intent with an Attention-based Encoder-Decoder Architecture. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '17). 147--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Malte Ludewig and Dietmar Jannach. 2018. Evaluation of Session-based Recommendation Algorithms. User-Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 28, 4--5 (2018), 331--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dietmar Jannach Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema, Paolo Cremonesi. 2019. Are We Really Making Much Progress? A Worrying Analysis of Recent Neural Recommendation Approaches. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '19). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Fei Mi and Boi Faltings. 2018. Context Tree for Adaptive Session-based Recommendation. CoRR (2018). arXiv:1806.03733Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Bamshad Mobasher, Honghua Dai, Tao Luo, and Miki Nakagawa. 2002. Using Sequential and Non-Sequential Patterns in Predictive Web Usage Mining Tasks. In Proceedings International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM '02). 669--672. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Massimo Quadrana, Paolo Cremonesi, and Dietmar Jannach. 2018. Sequence-Aware Recommender Systems. Comput. Surveys 51 (2018), 1--36. Issue 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jiaxi Tang and Ke Wang. 2018. Personalized Top-N Sequential Recommendation via Convolutional Sequence Embedding. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '18). 565--573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Fajie Yuan, Alexandros Karatzoglou, Ioannis Arapakis, Joemon M. Jose, and Xiangnan He. 2019. A Simple Convolutional Generative Network for Next Item Recommendation. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '19). 582--590. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Performance comparison of neural and non-neural approaches to session-based recommendation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      RecSys '19: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
      September 2019
      635 pages
      ISBN:9781450362436
      DOI:10.1145/3298689

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 September 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      RecSys '19 Paper Acceptance Rate36of189submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader