skip to main content
10.1145/3303772.3303814acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Goal-based Course Recommendation

Published:04 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

With cross-disciplinary academic interests increasing and academic advising resources over capacity, the importance of exploring data-assisted methods to support student decision making has never been higher. We build on the findings and methodologies of a quickly developing literature around prediction and recommendation in higher education and develop a novel recurrent neural network-based recommendation system for suggesting courses to help students prepare for target courses of interest, personalized to their estimated prior knowledge background and zone of proximal development. We validate the model using tests of grade prediction and the ability to recover prerequisite relationships articulated by the university. In the third validation, we run the fully personalized recommendation for students the semester before taking a historically difficult course and observe differential overlap with our would-be suggestions. While not proof of causal effectiveness, these three evaluation perspectives on the performance of the goal-based model build confidence and bring us one step closer to deployment of this personalized course preparation affordance in the wild.

References

  1. Lalitha Agnihotri, Alfred Essa, and Ryan Baker. 2017. Impact of Student Choice of Content Adoption Delay on Course Outcomes. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK '17). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bita Akram, Bradford Mott, Wookhee Min, Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, Eric Wiebe, and James Lester. 2018. Improving Stealth Assessment in Game-based Learning with LSTM-based Analytics. In Proceedings of the 11th International Educational Data Mining Conference. Pp. 208--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Juan Miguel L. Andres, Ryan S. Baker, Dragan Gašević, George Siemens, Scott A. Crossley, and Srećko Joksimović. 2018. Studying MOOC Completion at Scale Using the MOOC Replication Framework. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '18). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Michael Backenköhler, Felix Scherzinger, Adish Singla, and Verena Wolf. 2018. Data-Driven Approach Towards a Personalized Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 11th EDM Conference.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Yoshua Bengio, Réjean Ducharme, Pascal Vincent, and Christian Jauvin. 2003. A neural probabilistic language model. Journal of machine learning research 3, Feb (2003), 1137--1155. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael Geoffrey Brown, R. Matthew DeMonbrun, and Stephanie D. Teasley. 2018. Conceptualizing Co-enrollment: Accounting for Student Experiences Across the Curriculum. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '18). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Seth Chaiklin. 2003. The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context 1 (2003), 39--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sorathan Chaturapruek, Thomas Dee, Ramesh Johari, René Kizilcec, and Mitchell Stevens. 2018. How a data-driven course planning tool affects college students' GPA: evidence from two field experiments. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning @ Scale. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Weiyu Chen, Andrew S Lan, Da Cao, Christopher Brinton, and Mung Chiang. 2018. Behavioral Analysis at Scale: Learning Course Prerequisite Structures from Learner Clickstreams. In Proceedings of the 11th EDM Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Aurora Esteban, Amelia Zafra, and Cristóbal Romero. 2018. A Hybrid Multi-Criteria approach using a Genetic Algorithm for Recommending Courses to University Students. In Proceedings of the 11th EDM Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Josh Gardner and Christopher Brooks. 2018. Coenrollment Networks and Their Relationship to Grades in Undergraduate Education. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK '18). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Josh Gardner and Christopher Brooks. 2018. Evaluating Predictive Models of Student Success: Closing the Methodological Gap. Journal of learning Analytics 5, 2 (2018), 105--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Josh Gardner and Christopher Brooks. 2018. Student success prediction in MOOCs. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 28, 2 (2018), 127--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Felix A Gers, Jürgen Schmidhuber, and Fred Cummins. 1999. Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM. (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Balázs Hidasi, Alexandros Karatzoglou, Linas Baltrunas, and Domonkos Tikk. 2016. Session-based recommendations with recurrent neural networks. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Balázs Hidasi, Massimo Quadrana, Alexandros Karatzoglou, and Domonkos Tikk. 2016. Parallel recurrent neural network architectures for feature-rich session-based recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 241--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Martin Hlosta, Zdenek Zdrahal, and Jaroslav Zendulka. {n. d.}. Ouroboros: Early Identification of At-risk Students Without Models Based on Legacy Data. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sandeep M Jayaprakash, Erik W Moody, Eitel JM Lauría, James R Regan, and Joshua D Baron. 2014. Early alert of academically at-risk students: An open source analytics initiative. Journal of Learning Analytics 1, 1 (2014), 6--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Christopher V Le, Zachary A Pardos, Samuel D Meyer, and Rachel Thorp. 2018. Communication at Scale in a MOOC Using Predictive Engagement Analytics. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer, 239--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Yuetian Luo and Zachary A. Pardos. 2018. Diagnosing University Student Subject Proficiency and Predicting Degree Completion in Vector Space.. In Proceedings of the Eighth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI). AAAI Press, Pp. 7920--7927.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ivana Ognjanovic, Dragan Gasevic, and Shane Dawson. 2016. Using institutional data to predict student course selections in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 29 (2016), 49--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Zachary A Pardos, Zihao Fan, and Weijie Jiang. In press. Connectionist Recommendation in the Wild: On the utility and scrutability of neural networks for personalized course guidance. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (In press). https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09535Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zachary A Pardos, Steven Tang, Daniel Davis, and Christopher Vu Le. 2017. Enabling real-time adaptivity in MOOCs with a personalized next-step recommendation framework. In Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. ACM, 23--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Chris Piech, Jonathan Bassen, Jonathan Huang, Surya Ganguli, Mehran Sahami, Leonidas J. Guibas, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein. 2015. Deep knowledge tracing. neural information processing systems (2015), 505--513. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Agoritsa Polyzou and George Karypis. 2018. Feature extraction for classifying students based on their academic performance. In Proceedings of the 11th EDM Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Li Zhang and Huzefa Rangwala. 2018. Early Identification of At-Risk Students Using Iterative Logistic Regression. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. 613--626.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    LAK19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge
    March 2019
    565 pages
    ISBN:9781450362566
    DOI:10.1145/3303772

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 March 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader