skip to main content
10.1145/3308558.3313688acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

(Mis)Information Dissemination in WhatsApp: Gathering, Analyzing and Countermeasures

Published:13 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

WhatsApp has revolutionized the way people communicate and interact. It is not only cheaper than the traditional Short Message Service (SMS) communication but it also brings a new form of mobile communication: the group chats. Such groups are great forums for collective discussions on a variety of topics. In particular, in events of great social mobilization, such as strikes and electoral campaigns, WhatsApp group chats are very attractive as they facilitate information exchange among interested people. Yet, recent events have raised concerns about the spreading of misinformation in WhatsApp. In this work, we analyze information dissemination within WhatsApp, focusing on publicly accessible political-oriented groups, collecting all shared messages during major social events in Brazil: a national truck drivers' strike and the Brazilian presidential campaign. We analyze the types of content shared within such groups as well as the network structures that emerge from user interactions within and cross-groups. We then deepen our analysis by identifying the presence of misinformation among the shared images using labels provided by journalists and by a proposed automatic procedure based on Google searches. We identify the most important sources of the fake images and analyze how they propagate across WhatsApp groups and from/to other Web platforms.

References

  1. Alessandro Bessi and Emilio Ferrara. 2016. Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion. First Monday 21, 11 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Josh Constine. 2018. WhatsApp hits 1.5 billion monthly users. $19B? Not so bad.https://techcrunch.com/2018/01/31/whatsapp-hits-1-5-billion-monthly-users-19b-not-so-bad/”{Online; posted on 31-Jan-2018}”.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Shasta Darlington. 2018. As 'Lula' Sits in Brazil Jail, Party Nominates Him for President. N. Y. Times (Aug 2018). https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/05/world/americas/lula-brazil-election-luiz-inacio-lula-da-silva.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Emilio Ferrara. 2017. Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election. First Monday 22, 8 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Clayton Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2016. The Rise of Social Bots. Commun. ACM 59, 7 (June 2016), 96-104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Joseph L. Fleiss, Bruce Levin, and Myunghee Cho Paik. 2013. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Adam Fourney, Miklos Z. Racz, Gireeja Ranade, Markus Mobius, and Eric Horvitz. 2017. Geographic and Temporal Trends in Fake News Consumption During the 2016 US Presidential Election. In Proc. of the CIKM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kiran Garimella and Gareth Tyson. 2018. WhatsApp, Doc? A First Look at WhatsApp Public Group Data. In Proc. of the ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Vindu Goel, Suhasini Raj, and Priyadarshini Ravichandran. 2018. How WhatsApp Leads Mobs to Murder in India. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/07/18/technology/whatsapp-india-killings.html”{Online; posted on 18-Jul-2018}”.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Juliana Gragnani. 2018. Pesquisa ine´dita identifica grupos de família como principal vetor de notícias falsas no WhatsApp. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-43797257{Online; posted on 20-April-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank J. Massey Jr.1951. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American statistical Association 46, 253(1951), 68-78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Young Mie Kim, J. Hsu, D. Neiman, C. Kou, L. Bankston, S. Kim, R. Heinrich, R. Baragwanath, and G. Raskutti. 2018. The Stealth Media? Groups and Targets behind Divisive Issue Campaigns on Facebook. Political Communication 0, 0 (2018), 1-27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mallory Locklear. 2018. Researchers say Facebook's anti-fake news efforts might be working. https://www.engadget.com/2018/09/14/facebook-fake-news-efforts-working/{Online; posted on 14-Sep-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Tessa Lyons. 2018. Hard Questions: How Is Facebook's Fact-Checking Program Working?https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/06/hard-questions-fact-checking. ”{Online; posted on 14-Jun-2018}”.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Matheus Magenta, Juliana Gragnani, and Felipe Souza. 2018. How WhatsApp is being abused in Brazil's elections. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-45956557”{Online; posted on 24-Oct-2018}”.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnnatan Messias, Lucas Schmidt, Ricardo Rabelo, and Fabrício Benevenuto. 2013. You followed my bot! Transforming robots into influential users in Twitter. First Monday 18, 7 (July 2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Vishal Monga and Brian L. Evans. 2006. Perceptual image hashing via feature points: performance evaluation and tradeoffs. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15, 11 (2006), 3452-3465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dom Phillips. 2018. Jair Bolsonaro: Brazil presidential frontrunner stabbed at campaign rally. the Guardian (Sep 2018). https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/06/brazil-jair-bolsonaro-far-right-presidential-candidate-stabbedGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Julio C. S. Reis, Andre´ Correia, Fabrício Murai, Adriano Veloso, and Fabrício Benevenuto. 2019. Supervised Learning for Fake News Detection. IEEE Intelligent Systems 34, 2 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Gustavo Resende, Johnnatan Messias, Márcio Silva, Jussara Almeida, Marisa Vasconcelos, and Fabrício Benevenuto. 2018. A System for Monitoring Public Political Groups in WhatsApp. In Proceedings of the 24th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web(WebMedia '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 387-390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Filipe N. Ribeiro, Koustuv Saha, Mahmoudreza Babaei, Lucas Henrique, Johnnatan Messias, Fabrício Benevenuto, Oana Goga, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Elissa M. Redmiles. 2019. On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency(FAT*'19). Atlanta, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Simon Romero. 2016. Dilma Rousseff Is Ousted as Brazil's President in Impeachment Vote. N. Y. Times (Aug 2016). https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/01/world/americas/brazil-dilma-rousseff-impeached-removed-president.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tactical Tech. 2018. WhatsApp: The Widespread Use of WhatsApp in Political Campaigning in the Global South. https://ourdataourselves.tacticaltech.org/posts/whatsapp/”{Online; posted on 03-Jul-2018}”.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. David Treece. 2018. Brazil's ex-president Lula imprisoned to keep him out of the election. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/08/brazils-ex-president-lula-imprisoned-to-keep-him-out-of-the-election-lettersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1146-1151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '19: The World Wide Web Conference
    May 2019
    3620 pages
    ISBN:9781450366748
    DOI:10.1145/3308558

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 May 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format