Ben Shneiderman
- 1 Anderson, R.H., Bikson, T., Law, S.A., and Mitchell, B.M. Universal access to e-mail: Feasibility and societal implications. The Rand Corporation, 1995; Santa Monica; CA, www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR650/]] Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2 Clement, A. and Shade, L.R. The Access Rainbow: Conceptualizing universal access to the information/communications infrastructure. In Gurstein, M., Ed., Community Informatics: Enabling Communities with Information and Communications Technologies. Idea Publishing, Hershey, PA, 1999.]]Google Scholar
- 3 Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB), National Research Council. More than Screen Deep: Toward an Every-Citizen Interface to the Nation's Information Inj~astructure. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1997.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4 Kobsa, A. and Stephanidis, C. Adaptable and adaptive information access for all users, including disabled and elderly people. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia, ACM HYPERTEXT'98 (1998); wwwis.win.tue.nl/ah98/Kobsa.html]]Google Scholar
- 5 Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J. and Kiesler, S. The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services. Commun. ACM39, 12 (Dec. 1996), 55-63.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6 Laux, L.F., McNally, P.R., Paciello, M.G., Vanderheiden, G.C. Designing the World Wide Web for people with disabilities: A user centered design approach. In Proceedings of the Assets "96 Conference on Assistive Technologies, ACM, NY, (1996), 94-101.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7 National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Dept. of Commerce. Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide. Washington, DC (July 1999); www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/ digitaldivide/]]Google Scholar
- 8 Perry, J., Macken, E., Scott, N., and McKinley, J. L. Disability, inability and cyberspace. In Human Values and the Design of Technology. B. Friedman, Ed., CSLI Publications and Cambridge University Press, 1997, 65-89.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9 Shneiderman, B. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Third Edition. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1998.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 Silver, D. Margins in the wires: Looking for race, gender, and sexuality in the Blacksburg Electronic Village. In B. Kolko, L. Nakamura, and G. Rodman, Eds., Race in Cyberspace: Politics, Identity, and Cyberspace. Routledge, London, 1999.]]Google Scholar
- 11 Thomas, J.C., Basson, S., and Gardner-Bonneau, D. Universal design and assistive technology. In D. Gardner-Bonneau, Ed., Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1999.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12 van der Meij, H. and Carroll, J.M. Principles and heuristics in designing minimalist instruction. Technical Communication (Second Quarter 1995), 243-261.]]Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Universal usability
Recommendations
Non-universal usability?: a survey of how usability is understood by Chinese and Danish users
CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMost research assumes that usability is understood similarly by users in different cultures, implying that the notion of usability, its aspects, and their interrelations are constant across cultures. The present study shows that this is not the case for ...
Models for universal usability
IHM '03: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-MachineThis paper discusses how model-based approaches can support designers and developers to address a number of challenges raised by universal usability, such as the possibility of obtaining user interfaces able to adapt to any device and usability ...
Reviews
Edward Baker James
Most of us manage to use the telephone and find something to watch on television, but doing what we want with a computer seems ever more difficult. This paper promotes a concern with this fact, and suggests a research agenda aimed at improving things. There are great challenges in providing universal access, because people are so different. An easy-to-use method for one person <__?__Pub Caret>is just tedious for another. And what of disadvantaged users with no confidence in reading or pressing keys__?__ Many years ago, we provided a terminal aimed at giving every visitor to the Science Museum in London the experience of computer use. We found that young people clustered round, fiddled about, and had fun. Older people were often afraid to get close to the terminal. I have always believed that problems with computer use are an integral part of much wider problems of confidence in communicating. Whether research departments full of bright, confident users are the right places to dream up new ways of helping disadvantaged people is a moot point, but I cannot suggest anywhere better. Shneiderman has labored in these fields for many years, and we should listen to him.
Access critical reviews of Computing literature here
Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.
Comments