Adriana Caterina Camilleri
ABSTRACT
This research explains the rationale behind the utilisation of mobile learning technologies. It involves a qualitative study among children to better understand their opinions and perceptions toward the use of educational applications (apps) that are available on their mobile devices, including smartphones and tablets. The researchers organized semi-structured, face-to-face interview sessions with primary school students who were using mobile technologies at their institution. The students reported that their engagement with the educational apps has improved their competencies. They acquired relational and communicative skills as they collaborated in teams. On the other hand, there were a few students who were not perceiving the usefulness and the ease of use of the educational apps on their mobile device. This study indicates that the research participants had different skill-sets as they exhibited different learning abilities. In conclusion, this contribution opens-up avenues for future research in this promising field of study.
- Kapp, K.M. 2012. The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ge, X. and Ifenthaler, D. 2018. Designing engaging educational games and assessing engagement in game-based learning" In Gamification in Education: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice, 1--19, IGI Global, Hershey, USA.Google Scholar
- Hwang, G.J. and Wu, P.H. 2012. Advancements and trends in digital game-based learning research: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010," Brit. J. of Educ. Tech. 43(1), E6-E10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kinzie, M.B. and Joseph, D.R. 2008. Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: implications for educational game design, Educ. Tech. Res. and Dev. 56(5-6), 643--663.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carvalho, M.B., Bellotti, F., Berta, R., De Gloria, A., Sedano, C.I., Hauge, H.B., Hu, J. and Rauterberg, M. 2015. An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design," Computers & Education. 87, 166--181. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., MacArthur, E. Hainey, T. and Boyle, J.M. 2012. A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games," Comp. & Educ. 59(2), 661--686. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Crookall, D. 2010. Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline, Sim. & Gaming. 41(6), 898--920. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandholtz, J.H. 1997. Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. Teachers College Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
- Lugmayr, A., Sutinen, E., Suhonen, J., Sedano, C.I., Hlavacs, H., and Montero, C.S. 2017. Serious storytelling--a first definition and review, Multimedia Tools and Applic.. 76(14), 15707--15733. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wouters, P. Van Nimwegen, C. Van Oostendorp, H. and Van Der Spek, E.D. 2013. A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games, J. of Educ. Psych. 105(2), 249--266.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Loh, C.S. Sheng, Y. and Ifenthaler, D. 2015. Serious games analytics: Theoretical framework, In Serious Games Analytics, Springer, Cham, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Kiili, K. 2005. Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model, The Int. and Higher Educ. 8 (1), 13--24.Google Scholar
- Ebner, M. and Holzinger, A. 2007. Successful implementation of user-centered game-based learning in higher education: An example from civil engineering, Comp. & Educ. 49(3), 873--890. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burguillo, J.C. 2010. Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance, Comp. & Educ. 55(2), 566--575. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dickey, M.D. 2011. Murder on Grimm Isle: The impact of game narrative design in an educational game-based learning environment, Brit. J. of Educ. Tech. 42(3), 456--469.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Huang, W.H., Huang, W.Y. and Tschopp, J. 2010. Sustaining iterative game playing processes in DGBL: The relationship between motivational processing and outcome processing. Comp. & Educ. 55(2), 789--97. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harris, J. Mishra, P. and Koehler, M. 2009. Teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. J. of Res. on Tech. in Educ. 41(4), 393--416, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Camilleri, M.A. and Camilleri, A.C. 2017. Digital learning resources and ubiquitous technologies in education. Tech..Knowl. and Learning, 22(1), 65--82.Google Scholar
- Ciampa, K. 2014. Learning in a mobile age: an investigation of student motivation, J. of Comp. Assisted Learning, 30(1), 82--96.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Graesser, A. Chipman, P., Leeming, F. and Biedenbach, S. 2009. Deep learning and emotion in serious games, Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects, 81--100.Google Scholar
- Wouters, P. and Van Oostendorp, H. (Eds) 2017. Instructional techniques to facilitate learning and motivation of serious games. Springer, Cham, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Winterton, J. Delamare-Le Deist, F. and Stringfellow, E. 2006. Typology of knowledge, skills and competences: clarification of the concept and prototype. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
- Plowman, L. McPake, J. and Stephen, C. 2010. The technologisation of childhood? Young children and technology in the home. Children & Society, 24(1), 63--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnson, C.I. and Mayer, R.E. 2010. Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment. Computers in Human Behavior. 26(6), 1246--1252. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erhel, S. and Jamet, E. 2013. Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156--167.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Camilleri, M.A. and Camilleri, A.C. 2017. The Technology Acceptance of Mobile Applications in Education. In Sánchez, I.A. & Isaias, P. (Eds) 13th International Conference on Mobile Learning (Budapest, April 10th). Proceedings, International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS).Google Scholar
- Nolan, J. and McBride, M. 2014. Beyond gamification: reconceptualizing game-based learning in early childhood environments. Information, Communication & Society, 17(5), 594--608.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Granic, I., Lobel, A. and Engels, R.C. 2014. The benefits of playing video games. American Psychologist, 69(1), 66--78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fleming, M.J. and Wood, D.J.R. 2001. Effects of violent versus nonviolent video games on children's arousal, aggressive mood, and positive mood. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 31(10), 2047--2071.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ventura, M. Shute, V. and Kim, Y.J. 2012. Video gameplay, personality and academic performance. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1260--1266. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shulman, L. 1987. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review. 57(1), 1--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Girard, C., Ecalle, J. and Magnan, A. 2013. Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 207--219.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vogel, J.J., Vogel, D.S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C.A. Muse, K. and Wright, M. 2006. Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229--243.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oblinger, D. 2014. The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 1, Art. 10.Google Scholar
- Adams, D.M., Mayer, R.E., MacNamara, A., Koenig, A. and Wainess, R. 2012. Narrative games for learning: Testing the discovery and narrative hypotheses. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 235--249.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ferguson, C.J. 2011. Video games and youth violence: A prospective analysis in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(4), 377--391.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Griffiths, M.D. 1991. Amusement machine playing in childhood and adolescence: A comparative analysis of video games and fruit machines. Journal of Adolescence, 14(1), 53--73.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yee, N. 2006. Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 772--775.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Juul, J. 2009. Fear of failing? the many meanings of difficulty in video games. The video game theory reader, 2, 237--252.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J.W. 2009. Research designs: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, Sage. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Rollings, A. and Adams, E. 2003. Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on game design, New Riders, San Francisco, CA, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J.J. and Paas, F.G. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251--296.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Camilleri, M.A. and Camilleri, A.C. 2017. Measuring the educators' behavioural intention, perceived use and ease of use of mobile technologies, British Academy of Management Conference (BAM2017): Reconnecting Management Research with the Disciplines. Shaping the Research with the Social Sciences, Warwick, UK.Google Scholar
- Papastergiou, M. 2009. Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation, Computers & Education, 52(1), 1--12, 200. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Mobile Learning via Educational Apps: An Interpretative Study
Recommendations
Utilitarian and intrinsic motivations to use mobile learning technologies: An extended technology acceptance model
ICSLT '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on e-Society, e-Learning and e-TechnologiesStudents are increasingly utilizing mobile learning applications (m-learning apps) in various contexts. They can access their content from anywhere, anytime. This research explores the students’ perceptions about learning technologies in a higher ...
Identifying quality educational apps: Lessons from ‘top’ mathematics apps in the Apple App store
AbstractThere are 80,000+ educational apps in the Apple App Store and math apps are the most common. We searched for ‘math’ in the education category and selected the top 10 apps for each of the 3 filters provided by Apple (Relevance, Popularity, Rating) ...
The Educational Affordances of Mobile Instant Messaging MIM: Results of Whatsapp® Used in Higher Education
The popularity of Mobile Instant Messaging MIM has prompted educators to integrate it in teaching and learning in higher education. WhatsApp® is a multi-platform instant messaging application widely used worldwide, however, there is still little applied ...
Comments