skip to main content
10.1145/3340531.3412046acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

FANG: Leveraging Social Context for Fake News Detection Using Graph Representation

Published:19 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose Factual News Graph (FANG), a novel graphical social context representation and learning framework for fake news detection. Unlike previous contextual models that have targeted performance, our focus is on representation learning. Compared to transductive models, FANG is scalable in training as it does not have to maintain all nodes, and it is efficient at inference time, without the need to re-process the entire graph. Our experimental results show that FANG is better at capturing the social context into a high fidelity representation, compared to recent graphical and non-graphical models. In particular, FANG yields significant improvements for the task of fake news detection, and it is robust in the case of limited training data. We further demonstrate that the representations learned by FANG generalize to related tasks, such as predicting the factuality of reporting of a news medium.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3340531.3412046.mp4

mp4

43.7 MB

References

  1. O. Ajao, D. Bhowmik, and S. Zargari. 2019. Sentiment Aware Fake News Detection on Online Social Networks. In ICASSP. 2507--2511.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mihael Ankerst, Markus M Breunig, Hans-Peter Kriegel, and Jörg Sander. 1999. OPTICS: Ordering Points to Identify the Clustering Structure. ACM SIGMOD Record, Vol. 28, 2 (1999), 49--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ramy Baly, Georgi Karadzhov, Dimitar Alexandrov, James Glass, and Preslav Nakov. 2018. Predicting Factuality of Reporting and Bias of News Media Sources. In EMNLP. 3528--3539.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Levi Boxell, Matthew Gentzkow, and Jesse M. Shapiro. 2017. Is the Internet Causing Political Polarization? Evidence from Demographics. Technical Report NBER Working Paper No. 23258. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael M. Bronstein, Joan Bruna, Yann LeCun, Arthur Szlam, and Pierre Vandergheynst. 2017. Geometric Deep Learning: Going beyond Euclidean data. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Vol. 34, 4 (2017), 18--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Carlos Castillo, Marcelo Mendoza, and Barbara Poblete. 2011. Information Credibility on Twitter. In WWW. 675--684.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kareem Darwish, Dimitar Alexandrov, Preslav Nakov, and Yelena Mejova. 2017. Seminar Users in the Arabic Twitter Sphere. In SocInfo. 91--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Leon Derczynski, Kalina Bontcheva, Maria Liakata, Rob Procter, Geraldine Wong Sak Hoi, and Arkaitz Zubiaga. 2017. SemEval-2017 Task 8: RumourEval: Determining rumour veracity and support for rumours. In SemEval-2017. 69--76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In NAACL. 4171--4186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ming Dong, Bolong Zheng, Nguyen Quoc Viet Hung, Han Su, and Guohui Li. 2019. Multiple Rumor Source Detection with Graph Convolutional Networks. In CIKM. 569--578.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Aditya Grover and Jure Leskovec. 2016. node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks. In KDD. 855--864.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. William L. Hamilton, Zhitao Ying, and Jure Leskovec. 2017. Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphs. In NIPS. 1024--1034.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Naeemul Hassan, Gensheng Zhang, Fatma Arslan, Josue Caraballo, Damian Jimenez, Siddhant Gawsane, Shohedul Hasan, Minumol Joseph, Aaditya Kulkarni, Anil K. Nayak, Vikas Sable, Chengkai Li, and Mark Tremayne. 2017. ClaimBuster: The First-ever End-to-end Fact-checking System. VLDB, Vol. 10, 12 (2017), 1945--1948.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Xiangnan He, Ming Gao, Min-Yen Kan, Yiqun Liu, and Kazunari Sugiyama. 2014. Predicting the Popularity of Web 2.0 Items based on User Comments. In SIGIR. 233--242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, Vol. 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Zhiwei Jin, Juan Cao, Yu-Gang Jiang, and Yongdong Zhang. 2014. News Credibility Evaluation on Microblog with a Hierarchical Propagation Model. In ICDM. 230--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhiwei Jin, Juan Cao, Yongdong Zhang, and Jiebo Luo. 2016. News Verification by Exploiting Conflicting Social Viewpoints in Microblogs. In AAAI. 2972--2978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Dhruv Khattar, Jaipal Singh Goud, Manish Gupta, and Vasudeva Varma. 2019. MVAE: Multimodal Variational Autoencoder for Fake News Detection. In WWW. 2915--2921.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomas N. Kipf and Max Welling. 2017. Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks. In ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Elena Kochkina, Maria Liakata, and Arkaitz Zubiaga. 2018. PHEME dataset for Rumour Detection and Veracity Classification. (6 2018). https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/PHEME_dataset_for_Rumour_Detection_and_Veracity_Classification/6392078Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Vivek Kulkarni, Junting Ye, Steven Skiena, and William Yang Wang. 2018. Multi-view Models for Political Ideology Detection of News Articles. In EMNLP. 3518--3527.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach. arXiv:1907.11692 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang Liu and Yi-Fang Brook Wu. 2018. Early Detection of Fake News on Social Media Through Propagation Path Classification with Recurrent and Convolutional Networks. In AAAI. 354--361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Minh-Thang Luong, Hieu Pham, and Christopher D. Manning. 2015. Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation. In EMNLP. 1412--1421.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Jing Ma, Wei Gao, Prasenjit Mitra, Sejeong Kwon, Bernard J. Jansen, Kam-Fai Wong, and Meeyoung Cha. 2016. Detecting Rumors from Microblogs with Recurrent Neural Networks. In IJCAI. 3818--3824.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jing Ma, Wei Gao, Zhongyu Wei, Yueming Lu, and Kam-Fai Wong. 2015. Detect Rumors Using Time Series of Social Context Information on Microblogging Websites. In CIKM. 1751--1754.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Saif Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Parinaz Sobhani, Xiaodan Zhu, and Colin Cherry. 2016. SemEval-2016 Task 6: Detecting Stance in Tweets. In SemEval-2016. 31--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitra Mohtarami, Ramy Baly, James Glass, Preslav Nakov, Lluís Màrquez, and Alessandro Moschitti. 2018. Automatic Stance Detection Using End-to-End Memory Networks. In NAACL-HLT. 767--776.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Federico Monti, Fabrizio Frasca, Davide Eynard, Damon Mannion, and Michael M Bronstein. 2019. Fake News Detection on Social Media using Geometric Deep Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.06673 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D. Manning. 2014. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation. In EMNLP. 1532--1543.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Bryan Perozzi, Rami Al-Rfou, and Steven Skiena. 2014. DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representations. In KDD. 701--710.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Kashyap Popat, Subhabrata Mukherjee, Jannik Strötgen, and Gerhard Weikum. 2016. Credibility Assessment of Textual Claims on the Web. In CIKM. 2173--2178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Kashyap Popat, Subhabrata Mukherjee, Jannik Strötgen, and Gerhard Weikum. 2017. Where the Truth Lies: Explaining the Credibility of Emerging Claims on the Web and Social Media. In WWW. 1003--1012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kashyap Popat, Subhabrata Mukherjee, Jannik Strötgen, and Gerhard Weikum. 2018. CredEye: A Credibility Lens for Analyzing and Explaining Misinformation. In WWW. 155--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Natali Ruchansky, Sungyong Seo, and Yan Liu. 2017. CSI: A Hybrid Deep Model for Fake News Detection. In CIKM. 797--806.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Gerald Salton and Michael J. McGill. 1983. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Kai Shu, Deepak Mahudeswaran, Suhang Wang, Dongwon Lee, and Huan Liu. 2018. FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context and Dynamic Information for Studying Fake News on Social Media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.01286 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Kai Shu, Amy Sliva, Suhang Wang, Jiliang Tang, and Huan Liu. 2017. Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, Vol. 19, 1 (2017), 22--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kai Shu, Suhang Wang, and Huan Liu. 2019. Beyond News Contents: The Role of Social Context for Fake News Detection. In WSDM. 312--320.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Parinaz Sobhani, Diana Inkpen, and Xiaodan Zhu. 2017. A Dataset for Multi-Target Stance Detection. In EACL. 551--557.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Zoe Thomas. 2020. WHO says fake coronavirus claims causing `infodemic'. BBC News (13th Feb, 2020). https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-51497800Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. James Thorne and Andreas Vlachos. 2018. Automated Fact Checking: Task Formulations, Methods and Future Directions. In COLING. 3346--3359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Yaqing Wang, Fenglong Ma, Zhiwei Jin, Ye Yuan, Guangxu Xun, Kishlay Jha, Lu Su, and Jing Gao. 2018. EANN: Event Adversarial Neural Networks for Multi-Modal Fake News Detection. In KDD. 849--857.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Fan Yang, Yang Liu, Xiaohui Yu, and Min Yang. 2012. Automatic Detection of Rumor on Sina Weibo. In MDS. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Chunyuan Yuan, Qianwen Ma, Wei Zhou, Jizhong Han, and Songlin Hu. 2019. Jointly Embedding the Local and Global Relations of Heterogeneous Graph for Rumor Detection. In ICDM. 796--805.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. FANG: Leveraging Social Context for Fake News Detection Using Graph Representation

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CIKM '20: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
            October 2020
            3619 pages
            ISBN:9781450368599
            DOI:10.1145/3340531

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 19 October 2020

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

            Upcoming Conference

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader