skip to main content
10.1145/3341161.3342916acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

RumorSleuth: joint detection of rumor veracity and user stance

Published:15 January 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The penetration of social media has had deep and far-reaching consequences in information production and consumption. Widespread use of social media platforms has engendered malicious users and attention seekers to spread rumors and fake news. This trend is particularly evident in various microblogging platforms where news becomes viral in a matter of hours and can lead to mass panic and confusion. One intriguing fact regarding rumors and fake news is that very often rumor stories prompt users to adopt different stances about the rumor posts. Understanding user stances in rumor posts is thus very important to identify the veracity of the underlying content. While rumor veracity and stance detection have been viewed as disjoint tasks we demonstrate here how jointly learning both of them can be fruitful. In this paper, we propose RumorSleuth, a multitask deep learning model which can leverage both the textual information and user profile information to jointly identify the veracity of a rumor along with users' stances. Tests on two publicly available rumor datasets demonstrate that RumorSleuth outperforms current state-of-the-art models and achieves up to 14% performance gain in rumor veracity classification and around 6% improvement in user stance classification.

References

  1. M. Amoruso et al. Contrasting the spread of misinformation in online social networks. In AAMAS, pages 1323--1331, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. R. Bowman et al. Generating sentences from a continuous space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06349, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Budak, D. Agrawal, and A. El Abbadi. Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks. In WWW, pages 665--674, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Castillo, M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete. Information credibility on twitter. In WWW, pages 675--684, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W.-F. Chen and L.-W. Ku. UTCNN: a deep learning model of stance classification on social media text. In COLING, pages 1635--1645, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. N. Difonzo and P. Bordia. Rumors influence: Toward a dynamic social impact theory of rumor. In Science of social influence: Advances and future progress, pages 271--296, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Du, R. Xu, Y. He, and L. Gui. Stance classification with target-specific neural attention networks. In IJCAI, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. Friggeri, L. Adamic, D. Eckles, and J. Cheng. Rumor cascades. In ICWSM, pages 101--110, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. K. Gregor et al. DRAW: A recurrent neural network for image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.04623, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K. Hasan and V. Ng. Stance classification of ideological debates: Data, models, features, and constraints. In IJCNLP, pages 1348--1356, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Z. Jin et al. Multimodal fusion with recurrent neural networks for rumor detection on microblogs. In ACM MM Conf., pages 795--816, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. A. Kamins, V. S. Folkes, and L. Perner. Consumer responses to rumors: Good news, bad news. J Consum Psychol, 6(2):165--187, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. D. P. Kingma and M. Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. E. Kochkina, M. Liakata, and A. Zubiaga. All-in-one: Multi-task learning for rumour verification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03713, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Kwon, M. Cha, and K. Jung. Rumor detection over varying time windows. PloS one, 12(1):e0168344, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Q. Le and T. Mikolov. Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In ICML, pages 1188--1196, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. X. Li and J. She. Collaborative variational autoencoder for recommender systems. In KDD, pages 305--314, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. Liu, X. Qiu, and X. Huang. Recurrent neural network for text classification with multi-task learning. In IJCAI, pages 2873--2879, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. X. Liu et al. Real-time rumor debunking on twitter. In CIKM, pages 1867--1870, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Lukasik et al. Hawkes processes for continuous time sequence classification: an application to rumour stance classification in twitter. In ACL, volume 2, pages 393--398, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. Ma et al. Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks. In IJCAI, pages 3818--3824, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Ma, W. Gao, and K.-F. Wong. Detect rumor and stance jointly by neural multi-task learning. In WWW, pages 585--593, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. V. Qazvinian, E. Rosengren, D. R. Radev, and Q. Mei. Rumor has it: Identifying misinformation in microblogs. In EMNLP, pages 1589--1599, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. R. L. Rosnow. Inside rumor: A personal journey. American Psychologist, 46(5):484, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, and S. Aral. The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380):1146--1151, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. K. Wu, S. Yang, and K. Q. Zhu. False rumors detection on sina weibo by propagation structures. In ICDE, pages 651--662, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. W. Xu, H. Sun, C. Deng, and Y. Tan. Variational autoencoder for semi-supervised text classification. In AAAI, pages 3358--3364, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Z. Zhao, P. Resnick, and Q. Mei. Enquiring minds: Early detection of rumors in social media from enquiry posts. In WWW, pages 1395--1405, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. A. Zubiaga et al. Analysing how people orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at conversational threads. PloS one, 11(3), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. RumorSleuth: joint detection of rumor veracity and user stance

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ASONAM '19: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
        August 2019
        1228 pages
        ISBN:9781450368681
        DOI:10.1145/3341161

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 January 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        ASONAM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate41of286submissions,14%Overall Acceptance Rate116of549submissions,21%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader