skip to main content
10.1145/3341162.3343769acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Visual large-scale industrial interaction processing

Published:09 September 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this work we investigate the coordination of human-machine interactions from a bird's-eye view using a single panoramic color camera. Our approach replaces conventional physical hardware sensors, such as light barriers and switches, by location-aware virtual regions. We employ recent methods from the field of pose estimation to detect human and robot joint configurations. By fusing 2D human and robot pose information with prior scene knowledge, we can lift these perceptions to a 3D metric space. In this way, our system can initiate environmental reactions induced by geometric events among humans, robots and virtual regions. We demonstrate the diverse application possibilities and robustness of our system in three use cases.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Jawad Ahmad, Hadi Larijani, Rohinton Emmanuel, Mike Mannion, and Abbas Javed. 2018. An intelligent real-time occupancy monitoring system using single overhead camera. In Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference. Springer, 957--969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhe Cao, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Yaser Sheikh. 2017. Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. In CVPR, Vol. 1. 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonio Criminisi, Ian Reid, and Andrew Zisserman. 1999. A plane measuring device. Image and Vision Computing 17, 8 (1999), 625--634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Xiaochuan Fan, Kang Zheng, Youjie Zhou, and Song Wang. 2014. Pose locality constrained representation for 3D human pose reconstruction. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 174--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Christoph Heindl, Thomas Pönitz, Andreas Pichler, and Josef Scharinger. 2018. Large area 3D human pose detection via stereo reconstruction in panoramic cameras. In Proceedings of the OAGM Workshop 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Christoph Heindl, Sebastian Zambal, Thomas Pönitz, Andreas Pichler, and Josef Scharinger. 2019. 3D Robot pose estimation from 2D images. In International Conference on Digital Image & Signal Processing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Christoph Heindl, Sebastian Zambal, and Josef Scharinger. 2019. Learning to predict robot keypoints using artificially generated images. arXiv:arXiv:1907.01879Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Maheshkumar H Kolekar, Nishant Bharti, and Priti N Patil. 2016. Detection of fence climbing using activity recognition by support vector machine classifier. In 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON). IEEE, 398--402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Thomas Kosch, Yomna Abdelrahman, Markus Funk, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2017. One size does not fit all: challenges of providing interactive worker assistance in industrial settings. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 1006--1011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Julieta Martinez, Rayat Hossain, Javier Romero, and James J Little. 2017. A simple yet effective baseline for 3D human pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2640--2649.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Justinas Miseikis, Inka Brijacak, Saeed Yahyanejad, Kyrre Glette, Ole Jakob Elle, and Jim Torresen. 2019. Two-Stage Transfer Learning for Heterogeneous Robot Detection and 3D Joint Position Estimation in a 2D Camera Image using CNN. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.05718 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Nikolaos Nikolakis, Vasilis Maratos, and Sotiris Makris. 2019. A cyber physical system (CPS) approach for safe human-robot collaboration in a shared workplace. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 56 (2019), 233--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lauro Snidaro, Christian Micheloni, and Cristian Chiavedale. 2004. Video security for ambient intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 35, 1 (2004), 133--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Michal Tölgyessy, Martin Dekan, and Peter Hubinskỳ. 2018. Human-robot interaction using pointing gestures. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Control. ACM, 60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Denis Tome, Chris Russell, and Lourdes Agapito. 2017. Lifting from the deep: Convolutional 3D pose estimation from a single image. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2500--2509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Luyang Wang, Yan Chen, Zhenhua Guo, Keyuan Qian, Mude Lin, Hongsheng Li, and Jimmy S Ren. 2019. Generalizing monocular 3D human pose estimation in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05512 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    UbiComp/ISWC '19 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
    September 2019
    1234 pages
    ISBN:9781450368698
    DOI:10.1145/3341162

    Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 September 2019

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • demonstration

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader