Katharina Geldreich
ABSTRACT
It is generally accepted that children have their own understanding of how the world works. Teachers need to take their ideas and knowledge into account in the learning process. While there exists a lot of research on children's perceptions of science concepts, little is known about their perceptions of programming. Since the topic is now becoming more and more relevant in the primary school context, our study aims to provide insights into children's ideas and knowledge about programming. For this purpose, we conducted and filmed seven group discussions with a total of 61 third- and fourth-grade students (age 8-11). The videos were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The findings show that the students associate actions as well as programmable devices with the term programming. Furthermore, we have found out that boys and girls have very similar ideas about it.
- Valarie L. Akerson, Lawrence B. Flick, and Norman G. Lederman. 2000. The Influence of Primary Children's Ideas in Science on Teaching Practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37, 4 (2000), 363--385.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Michael Allen. 2010. Misconceptions in primary science. McGraw-Hill, Berkshire and New York. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/academiccompletetitles/home.actionGoogle Scholar
- Susan A. Ambrose. 2010. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
- David P. Ausubel, Joseph D. Novak, and Helen Hanesian. 1968. Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York.Google Scholar
- Fatime Balkan Kiyici. 2018. Primary School Students' Perceptions Of Technology. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology 6, 4 (2018), 53--66.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Keith C. Barton and Linda S. Levstik. 2004. Teaching history for the common good.Google Scholar
- Nadine Bergner. 2015. Konzeption eines Informatik-Schuelerlabors und Erforschung dessen Effekte auf das Bild der Informatik bei Kindern und Jugendlichen: Dissertation. Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Aachen.Google Scholar
- Harm J. A. Biemans and P. Robert-Jan Simons. 1996. Contact-2: A computerassisted instructional strategy for promoting conceptual change. Instructional Science 24, 2 (1996), 157--176. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120487Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joan Bliss. 1993. The relevance of Piaget to research into children's conceptions. In Children's informal ideas in science, Paul Joseph Black and Arthur Maurice Lucas (Eds.). Routledge, London, 20--45.Google Scholar
- Christian Borowski, Ira Diethelm, and Henning Wilken. 2016. What children ask about computers, the Internet, robots, mobiles, games etc. In Proceedings of the 11th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, Jan Vahrenhold and Erik Barendsen (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 72--75.Google ScholarDigital Library
- John D. Bransford. 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded ed., 7. print ed.). National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- John D. Bransford and Marcia K.Johnson. 1972. Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11, 6 (1972), 717--726.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. L. Brennan and D.J. Prediger. 1981. Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement 41, 3 (1981), 687--699.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Jeremy Brosnan. 1999. A new methodology, an old story? Gender differences in the "draw-a-computer-user" test. European Journal of Psychology of Education 14, 3 (1999), 375--385. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173121Google ScholarCross Ref
- Neil C. C. Brown, Sue Sentance, Tom Crick, and Simon Humphreys. 2014. Restart: the resurgence of computer science in UK schools. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 14, 2 (2014), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602484Google ScholarDigital Library
- Linda M. Campbell and Bruce Campbell. 2008. Mindful Learning: 101 Proven Strategies for Student and Teacher Success. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
- Christine Chin. 2001. Eliciting Students' Ideas and Understanding In Science: Diagnostic Assessment Strategies for Teachers. Teaching and Learning 21, 2 (2001), 72--85.Google Scholar
- Brent Davis. 1997. Listening for Differences: An Evolving Conception of Mathematics Teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28, 3 (1997).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pearl Denham. 1993. Nine- to fourteen-year-old children's conception of computers using drawings. Behaviour & Information Technology 12, 6 (1993), 346--358.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Filip Jozef Reginald Cornelius Dochy. 1992. Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning: The use of prior knowledge state tests and knowledge profiles. Centre for Educational Technology and Innovation, Open University.Google Scholar
- Filip J. R. C. Dochy and Patricia A. Alexander. 1995. Mapping prior knowledge: A framework for discussion among researchers. European Journal of Psychology of Education 10, 3 (1995), 225--242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172918Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rosalind Driver. 1989. Students' conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education 11, 5 (1989), 481--490.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rosalind Driver. 2014. Making Sense of Secondary Science. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Rosalind Driver and Gaalen Erickson. 1983. Theories-in-Action: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Study of Students' Conceptual Frameworks in Science. Studies in Science Education 10, 1 (1983), 37--60.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniela Efler-Mikat. 2009. Synopse der Lehrpläne der deutschen Bundesländer für das Fach Sachunterricht in der Grundschule. Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften, Kiel.Google Scholar
- Katrina Falkner, Rebecca Vivian, and Nickolas Falkner. 2014. The Australian Digital Technologies Curriculum: Challenge and Opportunity. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference - Volume 148 (ACE '14). Australian Computer Society, Darlinghurst, Australia, 3--12.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katharina Geldreich, Alexandra Funke, and Peter Hubwieser. 2016. A Programming Circus for Primary Schools. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives. 46--47.Google Scholar
- Katharina Geldreich, Alexandra Simon, and Peter Hubwieser. 2019. A Design-Based Research Approach for introducing Algorithmics and Programming to Bavarian Primary Schools. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung 33, Medienpädagogik und Didaktik der Informatik (2019), 53--75.Google Scholar
- Mary L. Gick and Keith J. Holyoak. 1980. Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology 12, 3 (1980), 306--355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aytac Gogus. 2012. Constructivist Learning. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, Norbert M. Seel (Ed.). Springer, New York, 783--786.Google Scholar
- Richard F. Gunstone and Richard T. White. 1981. Understanding of gravity. Science Education 65, 3 (1981), 291--299. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730650308Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexandria K. Hansen, Hilary A. Dwyer, Ashley Iveland, Mia Talesfore, Lacy Wright, Danielle B. Harlow, and Diana Franklin. 2017. Assessing Children's Understanding of the Work of Computer Scientists. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Michael E. Caspersen (Ed.). ACM, 279--284.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philip Johnson and Richard Gott. 1996. Constructivism and evidence from children's ideas. Science Education 80, 5 (1996), 561--577.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Slava Kalyuga. 2012. Role of Prior Knowledge in Learning Processes. Springer US, Boston, MA, 2886--2888. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_214Google Scholar
- Maria Kambouri. 2016. Investigating early years teachers' understanding and response to children's preconceptions. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 24, 6 (2016), 907--927.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sei Kwon and Katri Schroderus. 2017. Coding in Schools: Comparing Integration of Programming into Basic Education Curricula of Finland and South Korea. Finnish Society on Media Education, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
- John Leach, Rosalind Driver, Philip Scott, and Colin Wood-Robinson. 1995. Children's ideas about ecology 1: Theoretical background, design and methodology. International Journal of Science Education 17, 6 (1995), 721--732.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barbara B. Levin and Sean M. Barry. 1997. Children's views of technology: The role of age, gender, and school setting. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education 8, 4 (1997), 267--290.Google Scholar
- Robert J. Marzano. 1998. A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Mid-Continental Regional Educational Laboratory, Aurora, CO.Google Scholar
- Philipp Mayring. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173Google Scholar
- Kathrin Müller and Carsten Schulte. 2018. Are children perceiving robots as supporting or replacing humans?. In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education on - WiPSCE '18, Andreas Mühling and Quintin Cutts (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--4.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. J. Osborne and J. K. Gilbert. 1980. A Method for Investigating Concept Understanding in Science. European Journal of Science Education 2, 3 (1980), 311--321.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David N. Perkins. 1994. The intelligent eye: Learning to think by looking at art. Getty Education Inst. for the Arts, Los Angeles, Calif. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0635/94000030-d.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Michael Pressley, Eileen Wood, Vera E. Woloshyn, Vicki Martin, Alison King, and Deborah Menke. 1992. Encouraging Mindful Use of Prior Knowledge: Attempting to Construct Explanatory Answers Facilitates Learning. Educational Psychologist 27, 1 (1992), 91--109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701{_}7Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael T. Rücker and Niels Pinkwart. 2016. Review and Discussion of Children's Conceptions of Computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25, 2 (2016), 274--283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9592-2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sandra Schön, Martin Ebner, and Swapna Kumar. 2014. The Maker Movement. Implications of new digital gadgets, fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching. Educational Technology 39 (2014), 14--25.Google Scholar
- Amy M. Shapiro. 2016. How Including Prior Knowledge As a Subject Variable May Change Outcomes of Learning Research. American Educational Research Journal 41, 1 (2016), 159--189. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041001159Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert Sheehan. 2003. Children's perception of computer programming as an aid to designing programming environments. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Interaction design and children, Stuart MacFarlane (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kathleen C. Stevens. 1980. The effect of background knowledge on the reading comprehension of ninth graders. Journal of Reading Behavior 12, 2 (1980), 151--154.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicole Strangman, Tracey Hall, and Anne Meyer. 2004. Background Knowledge Instruction and the Implications for UDL Implementation. http://aem.cast.org/about/publications/2004/ncac-background-knowledge-udl.htmlGoogle Scholar
- F.E Weinert and A. Helmke. 1998. The neglected role of individual differences in theoretical models of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction 8, 4 (1998), 309--323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00024-8Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard White and Richard Gunstone. 1992. Probing Understanding. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203761342Google Scholar
- Karen Worth. 1999. The Power of Children's Thinking. In Inquiry: Thoughts, Views, and Strategies for the K-5 classroom, National Research Council (Ed.). National Science Foundation, 25--31.Google Scholar
- Xiaoyan Zhao, Marja van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, and Michiel Veldhuis. 2016. Teachers' use of classroom assessment techniques in primary mathematics education---an explorative study with six Chinese teachers. International Journal of STEM Education 3, 1 (2016), 153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0051-2Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Which Perceptions Do Primary School Children Have about Programming?
Recommendations
Students perceptions of programming in primary school
WiPSCE '19: Proceedings of the 14th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing EducationSince autumn 2018, teachers throughout Sweden are obliged to relate to programming in one way or another in the teaching, especially in the subject of mathematics and technology education. Although teachers should formally work with programming teaching ...
Gender Differences in Scratch Programs of Primary School Children
WiPSCE '17: Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing EducationIt is commonly believed that the attitudes towards programming are strongly dependent on gender among adolescents or adults. Regarding younger children, these differences in the attitudes might be less relevant. To investigate this, we have analyzed the ...
Investigation of the informatics-based self-concept of primary school children
WiPSCE '20: Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing EducationEducation should ensure that all children can move safely in the digital world, understand the phenomena and be able to play an active and self-determined role in shaping the future. A positive informatics-based self-concept (i.e. a self-concept ...
Comments