skip to main content
10.1145/3366423.3380070acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analyzing the Use of Audio Messages in WhatsApp Groups

Published:20 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

WhatsApp is a free messaging app with more than one billion active monthly users which has become one of the main communication platforms in many countries, including Saudi Arabia, Germany, and Brazil. In addition to allowing the direct exchange of messages among pairs of users, the app also enables group conversations, where multiple people can interact with one another. A number of recent studies have shown that WhatsApp groups play an important role as an information dissemination platform, especially during important social mobilization events. In this paper, we build upon those prior efforts by taking a first look into the use of audio messages in WhatsApp groups, a type of content that is becoming increasingly important in the platform. We present a methodology to analyze audio messages shared in WhatsApp groups, characterizing content properties (e.g, topics and language characteristics), their propagation dynamics and the impact of different types of audios (e.g., speech versus music) on such dynamics.

References

  1. Rubens Achilles Ana Letícia Loubak. 2019. WhatsApp admite envio ilegal de mensagens em massa nas Eleições 2018. https://www.techtudo.com.br/noticias/2019/10/whatsapp-admite-envio-ilegal-de-mensagens-nas-eleicoes-2018.ghtml. Acessed in 2019-10-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Bartsch and G. Wakefield. 2005. Audio thumbnailing of popular music using chroma-based representations. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 7, 1 (Feb 2005), 96–104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alessandro Bessi and Emilio Ferrara. 2016. Social bots distort the 2016 US Presidential election online discussion. First Monday 21, 11-7 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. R. Bhatia, S. Srivastava, V. Bhatia, and M. Singh. 2018. Analysis of Audio Features for Music Representation. In 2018 7th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO). 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO.2018.8748783Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Blei, A. Ng, and M. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research 3, Jan (2003), 993–1022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. David A Broniatowski, Amelia M Jamison, SiHua Qi, Lulwah AlKulaib, Tao Chen, Adrian Benton, Sandra C Quinn, and Mark Dredze. 2018. Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. American journal of public health 108, 10 (2018), 1378–1384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Victor S Bursztyn and Larry Birnbaum. 2019. Thousands of Small, Constant Rallies: A Large-Scale Analysis of Partisan WhatsApp Groups. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Josemar Alves Caetano, Gabriel Magno, Marcos André Gonçalves, Jussara M. Almeida, Humberto Torres Marques-Neto, and Virgílio A. F. Almeida. 2019. Characterizing Attention Cascades in WhatsApp Groups. CoRR abs/1905.00825(2019). arxiv:1905.00825http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.00825Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Carletta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Computational linguistics 22, 2 (1996), 249–254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Philipe de Freitas Melo, Carolina Coimbra Vieira, Kiran Garimella, Pedro O. S. Vaz de Melo, and Fabrício Benevenuto. 2019. Can WhatsApp Counter Misinformation by Limiting Message Forwarding?arxiv:cs.CY/1909.08740Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Doukhan, J. Carrive, F. Vallet, A. Larcher, and S. Meignier. 2018. An Open-Source Speaker Gender Detection Framework for Monitoring Gender Equality. In IEEE ICASSP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Clayton Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2016. The Rise of Social Bots. Commun. ACM 59, 7 (June 2016), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Adam Fourney, Miklos Z Racz, Gireeja Ranade, Markus Mobius, and Eric Horvitz. 2017. Geographic and temporal trends in fake news consumption during the 2016 US Presidential Election. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 2071–2074.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Iqbal. 2019. WhatsApp Revenue and Usage Statistics. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/whatsapp-statistics/. Accessed in 2019-09-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Jang, C. D. Yoo, S. Lee, S. Kim, and T. Kalker. 2009. Pairwise Boosted Audio Fingerprint. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 4, 4 (Dec 2009), 995–1004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Philipe Melo, Johnnatan Messias, Gustavo Resende, Kiran Garimella, Jussara Almeida, and Fabrício Benevenuto. 2019. WhatsApp Monitor: A Fact-Checking System for WhatsApp. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 13. 676–677.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. F. Oliveira. 2019. Facebook chega a 127 milhões de usuários mensais no Brasil. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/tec/2018/07/facebook-chega-a-127-milhoes-de-usuarios-mensais-no-brasil.shtml. Accessed in 2019-09-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Pennebaker, R. Boyd, K. Jordan, and K. Blackburn. 2015. The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Porter. 2013. Evaluating musical fingerprinting systems. Ph.D. Dissertation. McGill University Libraries.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. G. Resende, P. Melo, J. Reis, M. Vasconcelos, J. Almeida, and F. Benevenuto. 2019. Analyzing Textual (Mis)Information Shared in WhatsApp Groups. In WebSci ’19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. G. Resende, P. Melo, H. Sousa, J. Messias, M. Vasconcelos, J. Almeida, and F. Benevenuto. 2019. (Mis)Information Dissemination in WhatsApp: Gathering, Analyzing and Countermeasures. In WWW’19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Michael Seufert, Tobias Hoßfeld, Anika Schwind, Valentin Burger, and Phuoc Tran-Gia. 2016. Group-based communication in WhatsApp. In 2016 IFIP networking conference (IFIP networking) and workshops. IEEE, 536–541.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Analyzing the Use of Audio Messages in WhatsApp Groups
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            WWW '20: Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020
            April 2020
            3143 pages
            ISBN:9781450370233
            DOI:10.1145/3366423

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 April 2020

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format